Abstract
Everyday actions can be characterized by whether they are freely chosen or commanded by external stimuli, and whether they produce pleasant or unpleasant outcomes. To assess how these aspects of actions affect the sense of agency, we asked participants to perform freely selected or instructed key presses which could produce pleasant or unpleasant chords. We obtained estimates of the key press–chord intervals and ratings of the feeling of control (FoC) over the outcomes. Interval estimates were used to assess intentional binding—the perceived temporal attraction between actions and their outcomes. Results showed stronger binding and higher FoC ratings in the free compared to instructed condition. Additionally, FoC was stronger for pleasant compared to unpleasant outcomes, and for pleasant outcomes that were produced by freely selected compared to instructed actions. These results highlight the importance of free choice and outcome valence on the SoA. They also reveal how freedom of action selection and pleasantness of action-outcomes can interact to affect the FoC.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Although the number of trials for each condition is rather low (12), we also analyzed the influence of valence on the interval estimations by factoring in the chord type (perfect fifth, perfect fourth, minor second, major second) and yet did not find any significant effects.
References
Barlas Z, Obhi SS (2013) Freedom, choice, and the sense of agency. Front Hum Neurosci 7:514. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00514
Barlas Z, Obhi SS (2014) Cultural background influences implicit but not explicit sense of agency for the production of musical tones. Conscious Cogn 28:94–103. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.013
Barlas Z, Hockley WE, Obhi SS (2017) The effects of freedom of choice in action selection on perceived mental effort and the sense of agency. Acta Psychol (Amst) 180:122–129. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.09.004
Bettman JR, Johnson EJ, Payne JW (1990) A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 45:111–139. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90007-V
Bidelman GM, Krishnan A (2009) Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem. J Neurosci 29:13165–13171. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3900-09.2009
Blakemore SJ, Frith CD, Wolpert DM (2001) The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action. NeuroReport 12:1879–1884
Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM, Frith CD (2002) Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends Cogn Sci 6:237–242
Caspar EA, Christensen JF, Cleeremans A, Haggard P (2016) Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain. Curr Biol 26:585–592. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067
Cavazzana A, Penolazzi B, Begliomini C, Bisiacchi PS (2015) Neural underpinnings of the “agent brain”: new evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation. Eur J Neurosci. doi:10.1111/ejn.12937
Chambon V, Haggard P (2012) Sense of control depends on fluency of action selection, not motor performance. Cognition 125:441–451. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.011
Chambon V, Wenke D, Fleming SM et al (2013) An online neural substrate for sense of agency. Cereb Cortex 23:1031–1037. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs059
Christensen JF, Yoshie M, Di Costa S, Haggard P (2016) Emotional valence, sense of agency and responsibility: a study using intentional binding. Conscious Cogn 43:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.016
Cunnington R, Windischberger C, Deecke L, Moser E (2002) The preparation and execution of self-initiated and externally-triggered movement: a study of event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 15:373–385. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0976
Dewey JA, Knoblich G (2014) Do implicit and explicit measures of the sense of agency measure the same thing? PLoS One 9:e110118. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110118
Duval TS, Silvia PJ (2002) Self-awareness, prob- ability of improvement, and the self-serving bias. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:49–61
Ebert JP, Wegner DM (2010) Time warp: authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Conscious Cogn 19:481–489. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.002
Ebert JP, Wegner DM (2011) Mistaking randomness for free will. Conscious Cogn. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.12.012
Elsner B, Hommel B (2001) Effect anticipation and action control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:229–240. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229
Filevich E, Vanneste P, Brass M et al (2013) Brain correlates of subjective freedom of choice. Conscious Cogn 22:1271–1284. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.08.011
Forstmann BU, Brass M, Koch I, Von Cramon DY (2006) Voluntary selection of task sets revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Cogn Neurosci 18:388–398
Frith CD (2005) The self in action: lessons from delusions of control. Conscious Cogn 14:752–770. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.002
Frith CD, Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM (2000) Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philos Trans R Soc London Biol Sci 355:1771–1788. doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0734
Gallagher S (2000) Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn Sci 4:14–21
Haggard P (2005) Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 9:290–295. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.012
Haggard P (2008) Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:934–946. doi:10.1038/nrn2497
Haggard P, Tsakiris M (2009) The experience of agency: feelings, judgments, and responsibility. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18:242–246. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01644.x
Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J (2002) Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat Neurosci 5:382–385. doi:10.1038/nn827
Helmholtz H (1877) On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music. Dover Publications, New York
Khalighinejad N, Di Costa S, Haggard P (2016) Endogenous action selection processes in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex contribute to sense of agency: a meta-analysis of tDCS studies of “Intentional binding”. Brain Stimul 9:372–379. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.01.005
Kühn S, Brass M, Haggard P (2012) Feeling in control: neural correlates of experience of agency. Cortex 49:1935–1942. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.09.002
Miller DT, Ross M (1975) Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: fact or fiction? Psychol Bull 82:213–225. doi:10.1037/h0076486
Moore JW, Fletcher PC (2012) Sense of agency in health and disease: a review of cue integration approaches. Conscious Cogn 21:59–68. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.010
Moore JW, Haggard P (2008) Awareness of action: inference and prediction. Conscious Cogn 17:136–144. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2006.12.004
Moore JW, Haggard P (2010) Intentional binding and higher order agency experience. Conscious Cogn 19:490–491. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.11.007
Moore JW, Obhi SS (2012) Intentional binding and the sense of agency: a review. Conscious Cogn 21:546–561. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002
Moore JW, Lagnado D, Deal DC, Haggard P (2009a) Feelings of control: contingency determines experience of action. Cognition 110:279–283. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.006
Moore JW, Wegner DM, Haggard P (2009b) Modulating the sense of agency with external cues. Conscious Cogn 18:1056–1064. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.05.004
Moore JW, Ruge D, Wenke D et al (2010) Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency. Proc Biol Sci. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0404
Moreton J, Callan MJ, Hughes G (2017) How much does emotional valence of action outcomes affect temporal binding ? Conscious Cogn 49:25–34. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.12.008
Moretto G, Walsh E, Haggard P (2011) Experience of agency and sense of responsibility. Conscious Cogn 20:1847–1854. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.014
Obhi SS, Swiderski KM, Farquhar R (2013) Activating memories of depression alters the experience of voluntary action. Exp Brain Res 229:497–506. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3372-5
Plantinga J, Trehub SE (2013) Revisiting the innate preference for consonance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. doi:10.1037/a0033471
Prinz W, Dennett D, Sebanz N (2006) Toward a science of volition. In: Sebanz N, Prinz W (eds) Disorders of volition. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–16
Sebanz N, Lackner U (2007) Who’s calling the shots? Intentional content and feelings of control. Conscious Cogn 16:859–876. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2006.08.002
Sidarus N, Haggard P (2016) Difficult action decisions reduce the sense of agency: a study using the Eriksen flanker task. Acta Psychol (Amst) 166:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.003
Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Newen A (2008) Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Conscious Cogn 17:219–239. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010
Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Lindner A (2009) Me or not me–an optimal integration of agency cues? Conscious Cogn 18:1065–1068. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.07.007
Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Voss M (2013) The experience of agency: an interplay between prediction and postdiction. Front Psychol 4:127. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00127
Takahata K, Takahashi H, Maeda T et al (2012) It’s not my fault: postdictive modulation of intentional binding by monetary gains and losses. PLoS One 7:e53421. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053421
Taylor SE, Brown JD (1994) Positive illusions and well-being revisited: separating fact from fiction. Psychol Bull 116:21–27 (discussion 28)
Tramo MJ, Cariani PA, Delgutte B, Braida LD (2001) Neurobiological foundations for the theory of harmony in western tonal music. Ann N Y Acad Sci 930:92–116
Waszak F, Wascher E, Keller P et al (2005) Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection. Exp Brain Res 162:346–356. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2183-8
Wegner DM (2004) Précis of the illusion of conscious will. Behav Brain Sci 27:649–692
Wegner DM, Sparrow B (2004) Authorship processing. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neurosciences III. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1201–1209
Wegner DM, Wheatley T (1999) Apparent mental causation: sources of the experience of will. Am Psychol 54:480–492
Wenke D, Haggard P (2009) How voluntary actions modulate time perception. Exp brain Res 196:311–318. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1848-8
Wenke D, Waszak F, Haggard P (2009) Action selection and action awareness. Psychol Res 73:602–612. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0240-4
Wenke D, Fleming SM, Haggard P (2010) Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action. Cognition 115:26–38. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.016
Wolpert DM (1997) Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn Sci 1:209–216. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01070-X
Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882. doi:10.1126/science.7569931
Yoshie M, Haggard P (2013) Negative emotional outcomes attenuate sense of agency over voluntary actions. Curr Biol. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.034
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a NSERC Discovery grant held by SSO (RGPIN5484-16) and a Trillium scholarship held by ZB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barlas, Z., Hockley, W.E. & Obhi, S.S. Effects of free choice and outcome valence on the sense of agency: evidence from measures of intentional binding and feelings of control. Exp Brain Res 236, 129–139 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5112-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5112-3