Abstract
Many forms of social interaction require that behaviour be coordinated in the here and now. Much research has been conducted on how people coordinate their actions in real time to achieve a joint goal, showing that people use both synchronised (i.e. symmetric) and complementary (i.e. asymmetric) strategies. These two mechanisms have been mostly studied independently, the former in the context of rhythmic tasks, and the latter in non-rhythmic tasks. However, people often balance these two strategies in real-life social interactions, in order to achieve a joint goal more effectively. Here, our aim was to investigate how people may implicitly balance synchronisation and complementarity in a continuous joint aiming task. We asked dyads to synchronise the timing of their clicks between targets, while changing task constraints for one member of the dyad (i.e. different task difficulties) to asymmetrically perturb the continuous interaction. This allowed us to investigate how individuals implicitly negotiate complementary leader–follower dynamics to achieve synchronisation. We found that dyads flexibly switch from mutual to asymmetric adaptation given variations in task constraints. Specifically, our results show that both members adapt equally up to a certain level of difficulty; after this point, the partner with the difficult task becomes less adaptive, and hence more of a leader, while the adaptability of the member with the easier task remains unchanged. This proves to be an effective strategy in this asymmetric task, as people synchronise better with an irregular, but adaptive partner, than with a completely predictable, but non-responsive metronome. These results show that given asymmetric task constraints, adaptability, rather than predictability, facilitates coordination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boker SM, Xu M, Rotondo JL, King K (2002) Windowed cross-correlation and peak picking for the analysis of variability in the association between behavioral time series. Psychol Methods 7(3):338–355
Brennan SE, Hanna JE (2009) Partner-specific adaptation in dialoge. Top Cogn Sci 1(2):274–291. doi:10.1111/J.1756-8765.2009.01019.X
Decety J, Jeannerod M (1995) Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts’s law hold in motor imagery? Behav Brain Res 72(1–2):127–134
Fairhurst MT, Janata P, Keller PE (2013) Leading the follower: an fMRI investigation of dynamic cooperativity and leader-follower strategies in synchronization with an adaptive virtual partner. Neuroimage 84C:688–697. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.027
Fine JM, Amazeen EL (2011) Interpersonal Fitts’ law: when two perform as one. Exp Brain Res 211(3–4):459–469. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2707-y
Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47(6):381–391
Gambi C, Pickering MJ (2011) A cognitive architecture for the coordination of utterances. Front Psychol 2:275. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00275
Grosjean M, Shiffrar M, Knoblich G (2007) Fitts’s law holds for action perception. Psychol Sci 18(2):95–99. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01854.x
Hari R, Kujala MV (2009) Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. Physiol Rev 89(2):453–479. doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2007
Keller PE, Knoblich G, Repp BH (2007) Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: on the possible role of action simulation in synchronization. Conscious Cogn 16(1):102–111. doi:10.1016/J.Concog.12.004
Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979) On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science 203(4384):1029–1031
Knoblich G, Butterfill S, Sebanz N (2011) Psychological research on joint action: theory and data. In: Ross B (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol 54. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 59–101
Konvalinka I, Vuust P, Roepstorff A, Frith CD (2009) A coupled oscillator model of interactive tapping. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM), Jyvaskyla, Finland
Konvalinka I, Vuust P, Roepstorff A, Frith CD (2010) Follow you, follow me: continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Q J Exp Psychol (Colchester) 63(11):2220–2230. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.497843
Konvalinka I, Bauer M, Stahlhut C, Hansen LK, Roepstorff A, Frith CD (2014) Frontal alpha oscillations distinguish leaders from followers: multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains. Neuroimage 94:79–88. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.003
Loehr JD, Palmer C (2011) Temporal coordination between performing musicians. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 64(11):2153–2167. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.603427
MacKenzie IS (1992) Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum Comp Interact 7:91–139
Mardia KV, Jupp PE (2000) Directional statistics. Wiley, Chichester
Masumoto J, Inui N (2013) Two heads are better than one: both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint action. J Neurophysiol 109(5):1307–1314. doi:10.1152/jn.00776.2012
Masumoto J, Inui N (2014) Effects of speech on both complementary and synchronous strategies in joint action. Exp Brain Res 232(7):2421–2429. doi:10.1007/s00221-014-3941-x
Moelants D (2002) Preferred tempo reconsidered. In: Stevens C, Burnham D, McPherson G, Schubert E, Renwick J (eds) 7th International conference on music perception and cognition. Causal Productions, Sydney, pp 580–583
Mottet D, Guiard Y, Ferrand T, Bootsma RJ (2001) Two-handed performance of a rhythmical Fitts task by individuals and dyads. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 27(6):1275–1286
Newman-Norlund RD, van Schie HT, van Zuijlen AM, Bekkering H (2007) The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nat Neurosci 10(7):817–818. doi:10.1038/nn1911
Nowicki L, Prinz W, Grosjean M, Repp BH, Keller PE (2013) Mutual adaptive timing in interpersonal action coordination. Psychomusicol Music Mind Brain 23(1):6–20
Noy L, Dekel E, Alon U (2011) The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(52):20947–20952. doi:10.1073/pnas.1108155108
Ocampo B, Kritikos A, Cunnington R (2011) How frontoparietal brain regions mediate imitative and complementary actions: an FMRI study. PLoS ONE 6(10):e26945. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026945PONE-D-11-09925
Oullier O, De Guzman GC, Jantzen KJ, Lagarde J, Kelso JAS (2008) Social coordination dynamics: measuring human bonding. Soc Neurosci 3(2):178–192. doi:10.1080/17470910701563392
Pecenka N, Keller PE (2011) The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization. Exp Brain Res 211(3–4):505–515. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2616-0
Pezzulo G, Dindo H (2011) What should I do next? Using shared representations to solve interaction problems. Exp Brain Res 211(3–4):613–630. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2712-1
Pezzulo G, Donnarumma F, Dindo H (2013) Human sensorimotor communication: a theory of signaling in online social interactions. PLoS ONE 8(11):e79876. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079876PONE-D-13-14097
Repp BH, Keller PE (2008) Sensorimotor synchronization with adaptively timed sequences. Hum Mov Sci 27(3):423–456. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.016
Repp BH, Su YH (2013) Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychon Bull Rev 20(3):403–452. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2
Richardson MJ, Marsh KL, Isenhower RW, Goodman JR, Schmidt RC (2007) Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Hum Mov Sci 26(6):867–891. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002
Sacheli LM, Tidoni E, Pavone EF, Aglioti SM, Candidi M (2013) Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions. Exp Brain Res. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3459-7
Sallnäs EL, Zhai S (2003) Collaboration meets Fitts’s law: Passing virtual objects with and without haptic force feedback. In: Proceedings of INTERACT 2003: IFIP conference on human–computer interaction
Sartori L, Cavallo A, Bucchioni G, Castiello U (2012) From simulation to reciprocity: the case of complementary actions. Soc Neurosci 7(2):146–158. doi:10.1080/17470919.2011.586579
Schmidt RC, O’Brien B (1997) Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecol Psychol 9(3):189–206
Schmidt RC, Richardson MJ (2008) Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In: Fuchs A, Jirsa VK (eds) Coordination: neural, behavioral and social dynamics. Springer, Berlin, pp 281–308
Schmidt RC, Bienvenu M, Fitzpatrick PA, Amazeen PG (1998) A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 24(3):884–900
Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G (2006) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci 10(2):70–76. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009
van der Steen MC, Keller PE (2013) The ADaptation and Anticipation Model (ADAM) of sensorimotor synchronization. Front Hum Neurosci 7:253. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00253
van Ulzen NR, Lamoth CJ, Daffertshofer A, Semin GR, Beek PJ (2008) Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side. Neurosci Lett 432(2):88–93. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.070
Vesper C, Richardson MJ (2014) Strategic communication and behavioral coupling in asymmetric joint action. Exp Brain Res. doi:10.1007/s00221-014-3982-1
Vesper C, van der Wel RP, Knoblich G, Sebanz N (2011) Making oneself predictable: reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination. Exp Brain Res 211(3–4):517–530. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2706-z
Vesper C, van der Wel RP, Knoblich G, Sebanz N (2013) Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 39(1):48–61. doi:10.1037/a00280662012-12093-001
Zhai S, Kong J, Xiangshi R (2004) Speed-accuracy tradeoff in Fitts’ law tasks: on the equivalency of actual and nominal pointing precision. Int J Hum Comp Stud 61:823–856
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by MINDlab, part of the Danish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Higher Education’s Investment Capital for University Research initiative, and by the Danish Council for Independent Research, Technology and Production Sciences. We thank Guenther Knoblich for helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skewes, J.C., Skewes, L., Michael, J. et al. Synchronised and complementary coordination mechanisms in an asymmetric joint aiming task. Exp Brain Res 233, 551–565 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4135-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4135-2