Abstract
Delayed action research has suggested that perceptual information about a visual stimulus decays over several seconds. With event-related potential (ERP) methodology, one should be able to track the time course of the electrophysiological processes associated with this decay. Recently, Cruikshank et al. (J Vis 12:29, 2012) found that the N170 ERP component reflected ventral stream processes linked to motor planning and perception for action. Specifically, the N170 was larger for actions that relied on perceptual-based information. However, the delay interval was very short (tens of ms). Behavioral and neuroimaging studies suggest that when longer delays are employed, reactivation of ventral areas is necessary in order to access a stored representation of the target’s characteristics. Therefore, the N170 may reflect not only the perception-for-action processes, but also the accuracy of the representation. In order to test this, we traced the time course of the N170 in memory-guided reaching when 1-, 2-, and 3-s delays separated target occlusion and response initiation. During reach initiation, the N170 was more negative and peaked earlier for the 1 s than the 2- and 3-s delays and correlated significantly with performance at the longest delay. These results suggest that the neural mechanisms involved in movement planning change for delays beyond 1 s. The smaller N170 may reflect an impoverished visual perceptual representation in the ventral stream. To our knowledge, these are the first electrophysiological results to suggest that there is decay of visual perceptual information that occurs with increasing time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong GA, Singhal A (2011) Neural markers of automatic and controlled attention during immediate and delayed action. Exp Brain Res 213:35–48. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2774-0
Banko EM, Gal V, Vidnyanszky Z (2009) Flawless visual short-term memory for facial emotional expressions. J Vis 9(1):1–13. doi:10.1167/9.1.12
Batty M, Taylor MJ (2006) The development of emotional face processing during childhood. Dev Sci 9:207–220. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00480.x
Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G (1996) Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 8:551–565. doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
Buneo CA, Jarvis MR, Batista AP, Andersen RA (2002) Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature 416:632–636. doi:10.1038/416632a
Carpenter RH (2004) Contrast, probability, and saccadic latency; evidence for independence of detection and decision. Curr Biol 14:1576–1580. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.058
Cohen NR, Cross ES, Tunik E, Grafton ST, Culham JC (2009) Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach. Neuropsychologia 47:1553–1562. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.034
Cruikshank LC, Caplan JB, Singhal A (2012) Human electrophysiological reflections of the recruitment of perceptual processing during actions that engage memory. J Vis 12(29):1–13. doi:10.1167/12.6.29
Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134:9–21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
Eimer M (2011) The face-sensitivity of the n170 component. Front Hum Neurosci 5:119. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00119
Eimer M, Holmes A (2002) An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing. NeuroReport 13:427–431
Elliott D, Allard F (1985) The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements. Q J Exp Psychol A 37:407–425
Elliott D, Madalena J (1987) The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Q J Exp Psychol A 39:541–559
Elliott D, Calvert R, Jaeger M, Jones R (1990) A visual representation and the control of manual aiming movements. J Mot Behav 22:327–346
Elliott D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2001) A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychol Bull 127:342–357
Fiehler K, Bannert MM, Bischoff M, Blecker C, Stark R, Vaitl D, Franz VH, Rosler F (2011) Working memory maintenance of grasp-target information in the human posterior parietal cortex. Neuroimage 54:2401–2411. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.080
Franz VH, Hesse C, Kollath S (2009) Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control. Neuropsychologia 47:1518–1531. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.029
Ganel T, Tanzer M, Goodale MA (2008) A double dissociation between action and perception in the context of visual illusions: opposite effects of real and illusory size. Psychol Sci 19:221–225. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02071.x
Glover S (2004) Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci 27:3–24; discussion 24–78
Goodale MA (1998) Vision for perception and vision for action in the primate brain. Novartis Found Symp 218:21–34; discussion 34–9
Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20–25
Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Keillor JM (1994) Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 32:1159–1178
Gottsdanker R (1979) A psychological refractory period or an unprepared period? J Exp Psychol S2:208–215
Heath M (2005) Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. Mot Control 9:281–311
Heath M, Binsted G (2007) Visuomotor memory for target location in near and far reaching spaces. J Mot Behav 39:169–177. doi:10.3200/JMBR.39.3.169-178
Heath M, Westwood DA (2003) Can a visual representation support the online control of memory-dependent reaching? Evident from a variable spatial mapping paradigm. Mot Control 7:346–361
Heath M, Westwood DA, Binsted G (2004) The control of memory-guided reaching movements in peripersonal space. Mot Control 8:76–106
Heath M, Rival C, Neely K (2006) Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Muller-Lyer figures. Exp Brain Res 168:348–356. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0095-x
Heath M, Neely KA, Yakimishyn J, Binsted G (2008) Visuomotor memory is independent of conscious awareness of target features. Exp Brain Res 188:517–527. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1385-x
Heath M, Neely KA, Krigolson O, Binsted G (2010) Memory-guided reaching: what the visuomotor system knows and how long it knows it. In: Elliott D, Khan M (eds) Vision and goal directed movement: neurobehavioral perspectives, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp 79–95
Hesse C, Franz VH (2009) Memory mechanisms in grasping. Neuropsychologia 47:1532–1545. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.012
Himmelbach M, Nau M, Zundorf I, Erb M, Perenin MT, Karnath HO (2009) Brain activation during immediate and delayed reaching in optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia 47:1508–1517. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.033
Hu Y, Goodale MA (2000) Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. J Cogn Neurosci 12:856–868
Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199–208
Klatzky RL, Pellegrino J, McCloskey BP, Lederman SJ (1993) Cognitive representations of functional interactions with objects. Mem Cognit 21:294–303
Milner AD, Dijkerman HC, McIntosh RD, Rossetti Y, Pisella L (2003) Delayed reaching and grasping in patients with optic ataxia. Prog Brain Res 142:225–242. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(03)42016-5
Morgan HM, Klein C, Boehm SG, Shapiro KL, Linden DE (2008) Working memory load for faces modulates P300, N170, and N250r. J Cogn Neurosci 20:989–1002. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20072
Murata A, Gallese V, Kaseda M, Sakata H (1996) Parietal neurons related to memory-guided hand manipulation. J Neurophysiol 75:2180–2186
Nyberg L, Habib R, McIntosh AR, Tulving E (2000) Reactivation of encoding-related brain activity during memory retrieval. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11120–11124
Rossion B, Joyce CA, Cottrell GW, Tarr MJ (2003) Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. Neuroimage 20:1609–1624
Schenk T, McIntosh RD (2010) Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action? Cogn Neurosci 1:52–62. doi:10.1080/17588920903388950
Singhal A, Kaufman L, Valyear K, Culham J (2006) fMRI reactivation of the human lateral occipital complex during delayed actions to remembered targets. Vis Cogn 14(1):125–128
Singhal A, Culham JC, Chinellato E, Goodale MA (2007) Dual-task interference is greater in delayed grasping than in visually guided grasping. J Vis 7(5):1–12. doi:10.1167/7.5.5
Singhal A, Monaco S, Kaufman LD, Culham JC (2013) Human FMRI reveals that delayed action re-recruits visual perception. PLoS ONE 8:e73629. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073629
Sreenivasan KK, Katz J, Jha AP (2007) Temporal characteristics of top-down modulations during working memory maintenance: an event-related potential study of the N170 component. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1836–1844. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1836
Westwood DA, Goodale MA (2003) Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spat Vis 16:243–254
Westwood DA, Dubrowski A, Carnahan H, Roy EA (2000) The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects. Exp Brain Res 135:535–543
Westwood DA, Heath M, Roy EA (2001a) The accuracy of reaching movements in brief delay conditions. Can J Exp Psychol 55:304–310
Westwood DA, McEachern T, Roy EA (2001b) Delayed grasping of a Muller-Lyer figure. Exp Brain Res 141:166–173. doi:10.1007/s002210100865
Westwood DA, Heath M, Roy EA (2003) No evidence for accurate visuomotor memory: systematic and variable error in memory-guided reaching. J Mot Behav 35:127–133. doi:10.1080/00222890309602128
Wheeler ME, Petersen SE, Buckner RL (2000) Memory’s echo: vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11125–11129
Wronka E, Walentowska W (2011) Attention modulates emotional expression processing. Psychophysiology 48:1047–1056. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01180.x
Xu Y, Chun MM (2006) Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature 440:91–95. doi:10.1038/nature04262
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cruikshank, L.C., Caplan, J.B. & Singhal, A. A perception-based ERP reveals that the magnitude of delay matters for memory-guided reaching. Exp Brain Res 232, 2087–2094 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3897-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3897-x