Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of mechanical load on sequential effects

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Almost two decades ago, sequential effects of human grasping behaviour were described for the first time: In a sequential task, participants persisted in using the previous grasp type. According to the plan-modification hypothesis, such sequential effects reduce the movement planning costs and occur within a limited range of indifference. In the current study, we asked whether the anticipated mechanical costs of a movement would compete with the movement planning costs and, thus, reduce the magnitude of the sequential effect. To this end, participants were tested in a sequential, perceptual-motor task (opening a column of drawers), which offered a continuous range of posture solutions for each trial. In a pre-/post-test design, the magnitude of the sequential effect was measured before and after a manipulation phase with increased mechanical costs. Participants displayed a sequential effect for the majority of drawers in the pre-test, which was significantly reduced in the post-test. This finding indicates that each executed movement is a weighted function of both its cognitive and mechanical costs. The result also implies that sequential effects do not result solely from dynamical properties of the motor system, but instead reflect computational features of the movement selection process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chapman KM, Weiss DJ, Rosenbaum DA (2010) Evolutionary roots of motor planning: the end-state comfort effect in lemurs. J Comp Psychol 124(2):229–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrichsen J, White O, Newman D, Lally N (2010) Use-dependent and error-based learning of motor behaviors. J Neurosci 30(15):5159–5166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton ST, Fadiga L, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G (1997) Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. NeuroImage 6(4):231–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grèzes J, Decety J (2002) Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 40(2):212–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes CML, Reißig P, Seegelke C (2011) Motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task. Acta Psychol 138(1):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jax SA, Rosenbaum DA (2007) Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33(2):425–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan MI, Wolpert DM (1999) Computational motor control. In: Gazzaniga M (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS, Buchanan JJ, Murata T (1994) Multifunctionality and switching in the coordination dynamics of reaching and grasping. Hum Mov Sci 13(1):63–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto M, Nishimura T (1998) Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul 8(1):3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayergoyz ID (1991) Mathematical models of hysteresis. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meulenbroek RGJ, Rosenbaum DA, Thomassen AJWM, Schomaker LRB (1993) Limb-segment selection in drawing behavior. Q J Exp Psychol A 46(2):273–299

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologica 9:97–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Jorgensen MJ (1992) Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control. Hum Mov Sci 11(1–2):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Marchak F, Barnes HJ, Vaughan J, Slotta JD, Jorgensen MJ (1990) Constraints for action selection: overhand versus underhand grips. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance, vol 13. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, pp 321–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Cohen RG, Meulenbroek RGJ, Vaughan J (2006a) Plans for grasping objects. In: Latash ML, Lestienne F (eds) Motor control and learning. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 9–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Halloran ES, Cohen RG (2006b) Grasping movement plans. Psychon Bull Rev 13(5):918–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Cohen RG, Jax SA, Weiss DJ, van der Wel RPRD (2007) The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley’s legacy. Hum Mov Sci 26(4):525–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Chapman KM, Weigelt M, Weiss DJ, van der Wel R (2012) Cognition, action, and object manipulation. Psychol Bull 138(5):924–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti Y, Meckler C, Prablanc C (1994) Is there an optimal arm posture? Deterioration of finger localization precision and comfort sensation in extreme arm-joint postures. Exp Brain Res 99(1):131–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz C, Weigelt M, Odekerken D, Klein-Soetebier T, Schack T (2011) Motor control strategies in a continuous task space. Mot Control 15(3):321–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Seegelke C, Hughes CML, Schack T (2011) An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task. Exp Brain Res 215(1):65–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Short MW, Cauraugh JH (1997) Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: end-state comfort and point-of-change effects. Acta Psychol 96(1–2):133–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Short MW, Cauraugh JH (1999) Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect. Acta Psychol 100(3):243–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stöckel T, Hughes CL, Schack T (2012) Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children. Psychol Res 76(6):768–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut J-P, Toussaint L (2010) Developing motor planning over ages. J Exp Child Psychol 105(1–2):116–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24(3):830–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van der Wel RPRD, Rosenbaum DA (2010) Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance. Exp Brain Res 205(3):351–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Wel RPRD, Fleckenstein RM, Jax SA, Rosenbaum DA (2007) Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33(5):1117–1126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt M, Schack T (2010) The development of end-state comfort planning in preschool children. Exp Psychol 57(6):476–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt M, Kunde W, Prinz W (2006) End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. Exp Psychol 53(2):143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt M, Cohen RG, Rosenbaum DA (2007) Returning home: location memory versus posture memory in object manipulation. Exp Brain Res 179(2):191–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt M, Rosenbaum DA, Hülshorst S, Schack T (2009) Moving and memorizing: motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall. Acta Psychol 132:68–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss DJ, Wark JD (2009) Hysteresis effects in a motor task with cotton-top tamarins (Sanguinus oedipus). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 35(3):427–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss DJ, Wark JD, Rosenbaum DA (2007) Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do. The end-state comfort effect in cotton-top tamarins (Sanguinus oedipus). Psychol Sci 18(12):1063–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Schütz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schütz, C., Schack, T. Influence of mechanical load on sequential effects. Exp Brain Res 228, 445–455 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3576-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3576-3

Keywords

Navigation