Skip to main content
Log in

Getting a grip: different actions and visual guidance of the thumb and finger in precision grasping

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We manipulated the visual information available for grasping to examine what is visually guided when subjects get a precision grip on a common class of object (upright cylinders). In Experiment 1, objects (2 sizes) were placed at different eccentricities to vary the relative proximity to the participant’s (n = 6) body of their thumb and finger contact positions in the final grip orientations, with vision available throughout or only for movement programming. Thumb trajectories were straighter and less variable than finger paths, and the thumb normally made initial contact with the objects at a relatively invariant landing site, but consistent thumb first-contacts were disrupted without visual guidance. Finger deviations were more affected by the object’s properties and increased when vision was unavailable after movement onset. In Experiment 2, participants (n = 12) grasped ‘glow-in-the-dark’ objects wearing different luminous gloves in which the whole hand was visible or the thumb or the index finger was selectively occluded. Grip closure times were prolonged and thumb first-contacts disrupted when subjects could not see their thumb, whereas occluding the finger resulted in wider grips at contact because this digit remained distant from the object. Results were together consistent with visual feedback guiding the thumb in the period just prior to contacting the object, with the finger more involved in opening the grip and avoiding collision with the opposite contact surface. As people can overtly fixate only one object contact point at a time, we suggest that selecting one digit for online guidance represents an optimal strategy for initial grip placement. Other grasping tasks, in which the finger appears to be used for this purpose, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson J, Bingham GP (2010) A solution to the online guidance problem for targeted reaches: proportional rate control using relative disparity τ. Exp Brain Res 205:291–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer A-M, Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR (2009) Differences in fixations between grasping and viewing objects. J Vis 9:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U (2005) The neuroscience of grasping. Nat Rev 6:726–736

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill A, Hopkins B, Rönnqvist L, Vogt S (2000) Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:81–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Grave DDJ, Hesse C, Brouwer A-M, Franz VH (2008) Fixation locations when grasping partly occluded objects. J Vis 8:1–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desanghere L, Marotta JJ (2011) “Graspability” of objects affects gaze patterns during perception and action tasks. Exp Brain Res 212:177–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forssberg H, Eliasson AC, Kinoshita H, Johansson RS, Westling G (1991) Development of human precision grip I: basic coordination of force. Exp Brain Res 85:451–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galea MP, Castiello U, Dalwood N (2001) Thumb invariance during prehension movement: effects of object orientation. NeuroReport 12:2185–2187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Wing AM (1997) On the hand transport component of prehensile movements. J Mot Behav 29:282–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff B, Arbib MA (1993) Models of trajectory formation and temporal interaction of reach and grasp. J Mot Behav 25:175–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance IX. Eribaum, New Jersey, pp 153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G, Bäckström A, Flanagan JR (2001) Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. J Neurosci 21:6917–6932

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinholdermann U, Brenner E, Franz VH, Smeets JBJ (2007) Grasping trapezoidal objects. Exp Brain Res 180:415–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kritikos A, Dunai J, Castiello U (2001) Modulation of reach-to-grasp parameters: semantic category, volumetric properties and distractor interference? Exp Brain Res 138:54–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Wing AM (2003) Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry. Exp Brain Res 152:156–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melmoth DR, Grant S (2006) Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res 171:371–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melmoth DR, Storoni M, Todd G, Finlay AL, Grant S (2007) Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 183:283–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meulenbroek RGJ, Rosenbaum DA, Jansen C, Vaughan J, Vogt S (2001) Multijoint grasping movements. Simulated and observed effects of object location, object size, and initial aperture. Exp Brain Res 138:219–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mon-Williams M, McIntosh RD (2000) A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:268–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mon-Williams M, Tresilian JR (2001) A simple rule of thumb for elegant prehension. Curr Biol 11:1058–1061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Napier JR (1961) Prehensibility and opposability in the hands of primates. Symp Zool Soc 5:115–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, Frak VG, Toni I, Jeannerod M (1997) Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 114:226–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Meulenbrook RJ, Vaughan J, Jansen C (2001) Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. Psychol Rev 108:709–734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakata H, Taira M, Kusunoki M, Murata A, Tanaka Y (1997) The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action. Trends Neurosci 20:350–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schettino LF, Adamovich SV, Poizner H (2003) Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping. Exp Brain Res 151:158–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlicht EJ, Schrater PR (2007) Effects of visual uncertainty on grasping movements. Exp Brain Res 182:47–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Servos P, Goodale MA (1994) Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 98:119–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JB, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Mot Control 3:237–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JB, Brenner E (2001) Independent movements of the digits in grasping. Exp Brain Res 139:92–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JB, Brenner E (2002) Does a complex model help to understand grasping? Exp Brain Res 144:132–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Buneo CA, Hermann U, Flanders M (1995) Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donder’s law apply to arm movement? J Neurosci 15:6271–6280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valyear KF, Chapman CS, Gallivan JP, Marks RS, Culham JC (2011) To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools. Exp Brain Res 212:125–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Various authors (1999) Commentaries on a new view on grasping. Mot Control 3:272–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2000) Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologica 38:1473–1481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitwell RL, Lambert LM, Goodale MA (2008) Grasping future events: explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension. Exp Brain Res 188:603–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wing AM, Fraser C (1983) The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements. Q J Exp Psychol 35A:297–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 15:217–236

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by The Wellcome Trust (Grant 066282). We thank Dr Lore Thaler, Prof Mark Mon-Williams and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melmoth, D.R., Grant, S. Getting a grip: different actions and visual guidance of the thumb and finger in precision grasping. Exp Brain Res 222, 265–276 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3214-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3214-5

Keywords

Navigation