Abstract
Inferring causality is a fundamental feature of human cognition that allows us to predict outcomes in everyday events. Here, we use direct current stimulation (tDCS) to investigate the role of the right parietal lobe in the perception of causal events. Based on the results of a previous fMRI investigation, we hypothesized that the right parietal lobe plays a specific role in the processing of spatial attributes that contribute to judgments of causality. In line with our hypothesis, we found polarization-dependent modulation of causal judgments and corresponding reaction times (RTs) for trials with increasing violation of spatial contiguity in launching events. This effect was further modulated by temporal violations, as the effect of tDCS on the use of spatial information for causality judgements was strongest for trials with high temporal violations. Thus, especially for ambiguous trials with regard to temporal patterns, cathodal stimulation led to more liberal causality judgments for trials with high angles in movement trajectory. Furthermore, we found faster RTs after anodal stimulation of the right parietal lobe. These findings suggest a reduced influence of spatial attributes on the perception of causality after cathode stimulation of the right parietal lobe and an increased processing efficiency after anodal stimuli of the same region. These data demonstrate polarization-dependent tDCS modulation of spatial processing mechanisms within the right parietal lobe that contribute to the perception of causality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews SC, Hoy KE, Enticott PG, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB (2011) Improving working memory: the effect of combining cognitive activity and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Stimul 4:84–89. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2010.06.004
Antal A, Paulus W (2008) Transcranial direct current stimulation and visual perception. Perception 37:367–374
Antal A, Kincses TZ, Nitsche MA, Bartfai O, Paulus W (2004a) Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:702–707
Antal A, Nitsche MA, Kruse W, Kincses TZ, Hoffmann KP, Paulus W (2004b) Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 16:521–527. doi:10.1162/089892904323057263
Antal A, Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2006) Transcranial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex. Brain Res Bull 68:459–463. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.10.006
Battelli L, Alvarez GA, Carlson T, Pascual-Leone A (2009) The role of the parietal lobe in visual extinction studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci 21:1946–1955. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21149
Berryhill ME, Wencil EB, Branch Coslett H, Olson IR (2010) A selective working memory impairment after transcranial direct current stimulation to the right parietal lobe. Neurosci Lett 479:312–316. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.087
Billino J, Braun DI, Böhm KD, Bremmer F, Gegenfurtner KR (2009) Cortical networks for motion processing: effects of focal brain lesions on perception of different motion types. Neuropsychologia 47:2133–2144. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.04.005
Blakemore SJ, Fonlupt P, Pachot-Clouard M et al (2001) How the brain perceives causality: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroreport 12:3741–3746
Boggio PS, Castro LO, Savagim EA et al (2006a) Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurosci Lett 404:232–236. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.05.051
Boggio PS, Ferrucci R, Rigonatti SP, Covre P, Nitsche M, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F (2006b) Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 249:31–38. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.062
Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F (2007) Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 25:123–129
Boggio PS, Fregni F, Valasek C et al (2009a) Temporal lobe cortical electrical stimulation during the encoding and retrieval phase reduces false memories. PLoS One 4:e4959. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004959
Boggio PS, Khoury LP, Martins DC, Martins OE, de Macedo EC, Fregni F (2009b) Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80:444–447. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.141853
Boggio PS, Campanhã C, Valasek CA, Fecteau S, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F (2010a) Modulation of decision-making in a gambling task in older adults with transcranial direct current stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 31:593–597. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07080.x
Boggio PS, Zaghi S, Villani AB, Fecteau S, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F (2010b) Modulation of risk-taking in marijuana users by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Drug Alcohol Depend 112:220–225. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.06.019
Bolognini N, Fregni F, Casati C, Olgiati E, Vallar G (2010a) Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills. Brain Res 1349:76–89. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.06.053
Bolognini N, Olgiati E, Rossetti A, Maravita A (2010b) Enhancing multisensory spatial orienting by brain polarization of the parietal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 31:1800–1806. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07211.x
Boros K, Poreisz C, Münchau A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA (2008) Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans. Eur J Neurosci 27:1292–1300. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06090.x
Dambeck N, Sparing R, Meister IG, Wienemann M, Weidemann J, Topper R, Boroojerdi B (2006) Interhemispheric imbalance during visuospatial attention investigated by unilateral and bilateral TMS over human parietal cortices. Brain Res 1072:194–199. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.05.075
Diaz MT, He G, Gadde S, Bellion C, Belger A, Voyvodic JT, McCarthy G (2011) The influence of emotional distraction on verbal working memory: an fMRI investigation comparing individuals with schizophrenia and healthy adults. J Psychiatr Res. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.02.008
Dockery CA, Hueckel-Weng R, Birbaumer N, Plewnia C (2009) Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neurosci 29:7271–7277. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0065-09.2009
Fecteau S, Knoch D, Fregni F, Sultani N, Boggio P, Pascual-Leone A (2007) Diminishing risk-taking behavior by modulating activity in the prefrontal cortex: a direct current stimulation study. J Neurosci 27:12500–12505. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3283-07.2007
Ferrucci R, Marceglia S, Vergari M et al (2008) Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory. J Cogn Neurosci 20:1687–1697. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20112
Fertonani A, Rosini S, Cotelli M, Rossini PM, Miniussi C (2010) Naming facilitation induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. Behav Brain Res 208:311–318. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.10.030
Fonlupt P (2003) Perception and judgement of physical causality involve different brain structures. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 17:248–254. doi:S0926641003001125
Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M et al (2005) Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp Brain Res 166:23–30. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6
Fugelsang JA, Roser ME, Corballis PM, Gazzaniga MS, Dunbar KN (2005) Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 24:41–47. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.001
Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG (2006) Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117:845–850. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003
Giglia G, Mattaliano P, Puma A, Rizzo S, Fierro B, Brighina F (2011) Neglect-like effects induced by tDCS modulation of posterior parietal cortices in healthy subjects. Brain Stimul. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.01.003
Grosbras MH, Beaton S, Eickhoff SB (2011) Brain regions involved in human movement perception: a quantitative voxel-based meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. doi:10.1002/hbm.21222
Hilgetag CC, Théoret H, Pascual-Leone A (2001) Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced ‘virtual lesions’ of human parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 4:953–957. doi:10.1038/nn0901-953
Hsu TY, Tseng LY, Yu JX et al (2011) Modulating inhibitory control with direct current stimulation of the superior medial frontal cortex. Neuroimage 56:2249–2257. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.059
Hume D (1740/1960) A treatise of human nature. Clarendon, Oxford
Hume D (1748/1977) An enquiry concerning human understanding. Hackett, Indianapolis
Hummel FC, Heise K, Celnik P, Floel A, Gerloff C, Cohen LG (2010) Facilitating skilled right hand motor function in older subjects by anodal polarization over the left primary motor cortex. Neurobiol Aging 31:2160–2168. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.12.008
Iyer MB, Mattu U, Grafman J, Lomarev M, Sato S, Wassermann EM (2005) Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals. Neurology 64:872–875. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000152986.07469.E9
Kang EK, Kim YK, Sohn HM, Cohen LG, Paik NJ (2011) Improved picture naming in aphasia patients treated with cathodal tDCS to inhibit the right Broca’s homologue area. Restor Neurol Neurosci 29:141–152. doi:10.3233/RNN-2011-0587
Keehner M, Guerin SA, Miller MB, Turk DJ, Hegarty M (2006) Modulation of neural activity by angle of rotation during imagined spatial transformations. Neuroimage 33:391–398. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.043
Kim YH, Min SJ, Ko MH, Park JW, Jang SH, Lee PK (2005) Facilitating visuospatial attention for the contralateral hemifield by repetitive TMS on the posterior parietal cortex. Neurosci Lett 382:280–285. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2005.03.043
Kincses TZ, Antal A, Nitsche MA, Bártfai O, Paulus W (2004) Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human. Neuropsychologia 42:113–117. doi:S0028393203001246
Knoch D, Nitsche MA, Fischbacher U, Eisenegger C, Pascual-Leone A, Fehr E (2008) Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation–the example of punishing unfairness. Cereb Cortex 18:1987–1990. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm237
Ko MH, Han SH, Park SH, Seo JH, Kim YH (2008) Improvement of visual scanning after DC brain polarization of parietal cortex in stroke patients with spatial neglect. Neurosci Lett 448:171–174. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.050
Kwon YH, Jang SH (2011) The enhanced cortical activation induced by transcranial direct current stimulation during hand movements. Neurosci Lett 492:105–108. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.01.066
Lang N, Siebner HR, Chadaide Z et al (2007) Bidirectional modulation of primary visual cortex excitability: a combined tDCS and rTMS study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:5782–5787. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0706
Lewis PA, Miall RC (2003) Brain activation patterns during measurement of sub- and supra-second intervals. Neuropsychologia 41:1583–1592. doi:S0028393203001180
Liebetanz D, Nitsche MA, Tergau F, Paulus W (2002) Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 125:2238–2247
Marshall L, Mölle M, Hallschmid M, Born J (2004) Transcranial direct current stimulation during sleep improves declarative memory. J Neurosci 24:9985–9992. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2725-04.2004
Marshall L, Kirov R, Brade J, Mölle M, Born J (2011) Transcranial electrical currents to probe EEG brain rhythms and memory consolidation during sleep in humans. PLoS One 6:e16905. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016905
Meck WH, Penney TB, Pouthas V (2008) Cortico-striatal representation of time in animals and humans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18:145–152. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.002
Michotte AE (1946/1963) The perception of causality (trans: Miles TR, Miles E). Methuen, London (Original published in 1946)
Monti A, Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S et al (2008) Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:451–453. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.135277
Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527(Pt 3):633–639. doi:PHY_1055
Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W (2003) Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 114:2220–2222. doi:S1388245703002359 author reply 2222–2223
Nitsche MA, Grundey J, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W (2004a) Catecholaminergic consolidation of motor cortical neuroplasticity in humans. Cereb Cortex 14:1240–1245. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh085
Nitsche MA, Jaussi W, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W (2004b) Consolidation of human motor cortical neuroplasticity by D-cycloserine. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:1573–1578. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300517
Nitsche MA, Niehaus L, Hoffmann KT, Hengst S, Liebetanz D, Paulus W, Meyer BU (2004c) MRI study of human brain exposed to weak direct current stimulation of the frontal cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2419–2423. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.05.001
Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K et al (2005) Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 568:291–303. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092429
Nitsche MA, Roth A, Kuo MF et al (2007) Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity by general network excitability in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci 27:3807–3812. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5348-06.2007
Ragert P, Vandermeeren Y, Camus M, Cohen LG (2008) Improvement of spatial tactile acuity by transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 119:805–811. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.12.001
Reis J, Robertson E, Krakauer JW et al (2008a) Consensus: “can tDCS and TMS enhance motor learning and memory formation?”. Brain Stimul 1:363–369. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.08.001
Reis J, Robertson EM, Krakauer JW et al (2008b) Consensus: can transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation enhance motor learning and memory formation? Brain Stimul 1:363–369. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.08.001
Roser ME, Fugelsang JA, Dunbar KN, Corballis PM, Gazzaniga MS (2005) Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain. Neuropsychology 19:591–602. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.5.591
Satpute AB, Fenker DB, Waldmann MR, Tabibnia G, Holyoak KJ, Lieberman MD (2005) An fMRI study of causal judgments. Eur J Neurosci 22:1233–1238. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04292.x
Schlottmann A, Ray ED, Mitchell A, Demetriou N (2006) Perceived physical and social causality in animated motions: spontaneous reports and ratings. Acta Psychol (Amst) 123:112–143. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.05.006
Scholl BJ, Tremoulet PD (2000) Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends Cogn Sci 4:299–309. doi:S1364-6613(00)01506-0
Schweid L, Rushmore RJ, Valero-Cabré A (2008) Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on posterior parietal cortex disrupts visuo-spatial processing in the contralateral visual field. Exp Brain Res 186:409–417. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1245-0
Shulman GL, Ollinger JM, Akbudak E, Conturo TE, Snyder AZ, Petersen SE, Corbetta M (1999) Areas involved in encoding and applying directional expectations to moving objects. J Neurosci 19:9480–9496
Shulman GL, Pope DL, Astafiev SV, McAvoy MP, Snyder AZ, Corbetta M (2010) Right hemisphere dominance during spatial selective attention and target detection occurs outside the dorsal frontoparietal network. J Neurosci 30:3640–3651. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4085-09.2010
Sparing R, Dafotakis M, Meister IG, Thirugnanasambandam N, Fink GR (2008) Enhancing language performance with non-invasive brain stimulation–a transcranial direct current stimulation study in healthy humans. Neuropsychologia 46:261–268. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.009
Sparing R, Thimm M, Hesse MD, Küst J, Karbe H, Fink GR (2009) Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation. Brain 132:3011–3020. doi:10.1093/brain/awp154
Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA (2011) Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 17:37–53. doi:10.1177/1073858410386614
Stagg CJ, Jayaram G, Pastor D, Kincses ZT, Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H (2011) Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia 49:800–804. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.009
Straube B, Chatterjee A (2010) Space and time in perceptual causality. Front Hum Neurosci 4:28. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00028
Tschacher W, Kupper Z (2006) Perception of causality in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Schizophr Bull 32(Suppl 1):S106–S112. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbl018
Vallar G, Bolognini N (2011) Behavioural facilitation following brain stimulation: implications for neurorehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil 19:1–32. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.574050
Vines BW, Schnider NM, Schlaug G (2006) Testing for causality with transcranial direct current stimulation: pitch memory and the left supramarginal gyrus. Neuroreport 17:1047–1050. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000223396.05070.a2
Wu DH, Morganti A, Chatterjee A (2008) Neural substrates of processing path and manner information of a moving event. Neuropsychologia 46:704–713. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.016
Zacks JM, Swallow KM, Vettel JM, McAvoy MP (2006) Visual motion and the neural correlates of event perception. Brain Res 1076:150–162. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.122
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Straube, B., Wolk, D. & Chatterjee, A. The role of the right parietal lobe in the perception of causality: a tDCS study. Exp Brain Res 215, 315–325 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2899-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2899-1