Skip to main content
Log in

Juggling reveals a decisional component to tactile suppression

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goal-directed movements are characterized by sensory suppression, that is, by decreased sensitivity to tactile stimuli. In the present study, we investigated tactile suppression during movement using a complex motor task: basic 3-ball juggling. It was hypothesized that a decrease in tactile sensitivity would be observed, together with a shift in participants’ response bias while juggling. In a first experiment, participants had to detect a short gap in an otherwise continuous vibratory stimulus, which was delivered to their wrist under conditions of rest or else while juggling. In a second experiment, participants detected a short time gap in a continuous auditory signal, under the same conditions. In a final control experiment performed at rest, participants detected a short time gap in an auditory or tactile signal. In an additional condition, the detection of a gap in tactile stimulation was required under conditions of intramodal tactile interference. Participants were significantly less sensitive to detect a gap in tactile stimulation whilst juggling. Most importantly, these results were paired with a significant shift toward participants adopting a more conservative criterion when responding to the presence of the gap (i.e. they were more likely to say that a gap was not present). Taken together, these results demonstrate movement-related tactile sensory suppression and point to a decisional component in tactile suppression, thus suggesting that tactile suppression could already be triggered in the brain ahead of the motor command.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bays PM, Wolpert DM (2007) Computational principles of sensoriomotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. J Physiol 578:387–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vis 10:433–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brozzoli C, Pavani F, Urquizar C, Cardinali L, Farnè A (2009) Grasping actions remap peripersonal space. Neuroreport 20:913–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham G, Carey P, Colino FL, deGrosbois J, Binsted G (2010) Gating of vibrotactile detection during visually guided bimanual reaches. Exp Brain Res 201:411–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CE, Beauchamp E (2006) Differential controls over tactile detection in humans by motor commands and peripheral reafference. J Neurophysiol 96:1664–1675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Lafuente V, Romo R (2005) Neuronal correlates of subjective sensory experience. Nat Neurosci 8:1698–1703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallace A, Zeeden S, Röder B, Spence C (2010) Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body. Conscious Cogn 19:215–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal-detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Whitford B (2004) Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal to sensory suppression. Cogn Brain Res 19:52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlushchuk Y, Hari R (2006) Transient suppression of ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex during tactile finger stimulation. J Neurosci 26:5819–5824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes NP, Spence C (2005) Multisensory integration: space, time and superadditivity. Curr Biol 15:R762–R764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan TC (1972) Characteristics of visual and proprioceptive response times in the learning of a motor skill. Q J Exp Psychol 24:536–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juravle G, Deubel H, Tan HZ, Spence C (2010) Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement. Behav Brain Res 208:391–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kastrup A, Baudewig J, Schnaudigel S, Huonker R, Becker L, Sohns JM, Dechent P, Klingner C, Witte OW (2008) Behavioral correlates of negative BOLD signal changes in the primary somatosensory cortex. Neuroimage 41:1364–1371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klingner CM, Ebenau K, Hasler C, Brodoehl S, Görlich Y, Witte OW (2011) Influences of negative BOLD responses on positive BOLD responses. Neuroimage 55:1709–1715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klingner CM, Hasler C, Brodoehl S, Witte OW (2010) Dependence of the negative BOLD response on somatosensory stimulus intensity. Neuroimage 53:189–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2005) Detection theory: a user’s guide, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall RC, Wolpert DM (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9:1265–1279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelli DG (1997) The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vis 10:437–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romo R, Hernandez A, Zainos A (2004) Neuronal correlates of perceptual decision in ventral premotor cortex. Neuron 41:165–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romo R, Salinas E (2001) Touch and go: decision-making mechanisms in somatosensation. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:107–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stein BE, Meredith MA (1993) The merging of the senses. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beers RJ, Sitting AC, Denier van der Gon JJ (1998) The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp Brain Res 122:367–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voss M, Bays PM, Rothwell JC, Wolpert DM (2007) An improvement in perception of self-generated tactile stimuli following theta-burst stimulation of primary motor cortex. Neuropsychologia 45:2712–2717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voss M, Ingram JN, Haggard P, Wolpert DM (2006) Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement. Nat Neurosci 9:26–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensoriomotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Will Crouch for his kind and valuable help with the initial testing of this paradigm. Georgiana Juravle holds an ‘Open Horizons’ scholarship, awarded by the Dinu Patriciu Foundation, Bucharest, Romania.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgiana Juravle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Juravle, G., Spence, C. Juggling reveals a decisional component to tactile suppression. Exp Brain Res 213, 87–97 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2780-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2780-2

Keywords

Navigation