Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Training-induced changes in the pattern of triceps to biceps activation during reaching tasks after chronic and severe stroke

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This exploratory study was undertaken to investigate the mechanisms that contributed to improvements in upper limb function following a novel training program. Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to examine training-induced changes in the pattern of triceps and biceps activation during reaching tasks in stroke survivors with severe paresis in the chronic stage of recovery. The EMG data were obtained in the context of a single blind randomised clinical trial conducted with 42 stroke survivors with minimal upper limb muscle activity and who were more than 6 months post-stroke. Of the 33 participants who completed the study, 10 received training of reaching using a non-robotic upper limb training device, the SMART Arm, with EMG triggered functional electrical stimulation (EMG-stim), 13 received training of reaching using the SMART Arm alone, and 10 received no intervention. Each intervention group engaged in 12 1-h training sessions over a 4-week period. Clinical and laboratory measures of upper limb function were administered prior to training (0 weeks), at completion (4 weeks) and 2 months (12 weeks) after training. The primary outcome measure was ‘upper arm function’ which is Item 6 of the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS). Laboratory measures consisted of two multijoint reaching tasks to assess ‘maximum isometric force’ and ‘maximum distance reached’. Surface EMG was used to monitor triceps brachii and biceps brachii during the two reaching tasks. To provide a comparison with normal values, seven healthy adults were tested on one of the reaching tasks according to the same procedure. Study findings demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in upper limb function for stroke participants in the two training groups compared to those who received no training however no difference was found between the two training groups. For the reaching tasks, all stroke participants, when compared to normal healthy adults, exhibited lower triceps and biceps activation and a lower ratio of triceps to biceps activation. Following training, stroke participants demonstrated increased triceps activation and an increased ratio of triceps to biceps activation for the task that was trained. Better performance was associated with greater triceps activation and a higher ratio of triceps to biceps activation. The findings suggest that increased activation of triceps as an agonist and an improved coordination between triceps and biceps could have mediated the observed changes in arm function. The changes in EMG activity were small relative to the changes in arm function indicating that factors, such as the contribution of other muscles of reaching, may also be implicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson P, Dyhre-Poulsen P (2002) Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol 93(4):1318–1326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ada L, Canning CG, Low S (2003) Stroke patients have selective weakness in shortened range. Brain 126:724–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barker RN, Brauer SG, Carson RG (2008) Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel nonrobotic device: a randomized clinical trial. Stroke 39(6):1800–1807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry BK, Warman GE, Carson RG (2005) Age-related differences in rapid muscle activation after rate of force development training of the elbow flexors. Exp Brain Res 162(1):122–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bobath B (1990) Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. William-Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourbonnais D, Vanden Noven S (1989) Weakness in patients with hemiparesis. Am J Occup Ther 43:313–319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canning CG, Ada L, O’Dwyer N (1999) Slowness to develop force contributes to weakness after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:66–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carr J, Shepherd R (2003) Stroke Rehabilitation: guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill. Butterworth-Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr J, Shepherd R, Nordholm L, Lynne D (1985) Investigation of the motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physiotherapy 65(2):175–179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll TJ, Riek S, Carson RG (2002) The sites of neural adaptation induced by resistance training in humans. J Physiol 544(Pt 2):641–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chae J, Yang G, Park BK, Labatia I (2002) Muscle weakness and co-contraction in upper limb hemiparesis: relationship to motor impairment and physical disability. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 16(3):241–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz EG, Waldinger HC, Kamper DG (2005) Kinetic and kinematic workspaces of the index finger following stroke. Brain 128(Pt 5):1112–1121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delitto A, Snyder-Mackler L (1990) Two theories of muscle strength augmentation using percutaneous electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 70:158–164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewald JP, Pope PS, Given JD, Buchanan TS, Rymer WZ (1995) Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. Brain 118(2):495–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edstrom L, Grimby L (1986) Effects of exercise on the motor unit. Muscle Nerve 9:104–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flament D, Shapiro MB, Kempf T, Corcos DM (1999) Time course and temporal order of changes in movement kinematics during learning of fast and accurate elbow flexions. Exp Brain Res 129(3):441–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gemperline JJ, Allen S, Walk D, Rymer WZ (1995) Characteristics of motor unit discharge in subjects with hemiparesis. Muscle Nerve 18:1101–1114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gielen SCAM (1999) What does EMG tell us about muscle function? Motor Control 3:9–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gowland C, deBruin H, Basmajian JV, Plews N, Burcea I (1992) Agonist and antagonist activity during voluntary upper-limb movement in patients with stroke. Phys Ther 72(9):624–633

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hachisuka KJ, Umezu YC, Ogata HJ (1997) Disuse muscle atrophy of lower limbs in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78(1):13–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hakkinen K, Newton RU, Gordon SE, McCormick M, Volek JS, Nindl BC et al (1998) Changes in muscle morphology, electromyographic activity, and force production characteristics during progressive strength training in young and older men. J Gerontol 53(6):B415–B423

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond MC, Fitts S, Kraft G (1988) Recruitment and termination of electomyographic activity in the hemiparetic forearm. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69(2):106–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hara Y, Masakado Y, Chino N (2004) The physiological functional loss of single thenar motor units in the stroke patients: when does it occur? Does it progress? Clin Neurophysiol 115:97–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G (2000) Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 10(5):361–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Tong KY, Song R, Tsang VS, Leung PO, Li L (2007) Variation of muscle coactivation patterns in chronic stroke during robot-assisted elbow training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(8):1022–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu XL, Tong KY, Song R, Zheng XJ, Lui KH, Leung WW et al (2008) Quantitative evaluation of motor functional recovery process in chronic stroke patients during robot-assisted wrist training. J Electromyogr Kinesiol [Epub ahead of print]

  • Johansson RS, Hager C, Riso R (1992) Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. II. Changes in load force rate. Exp Brain Res 89:192–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levin MF (1996) Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain 119:281–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin MF, Dimov M (1997) Spatial zones for muscle coactivation and the control of postural stability. Exp Brain Res 757(1):43–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman E, Spaans F, Reulen J, Leffers P, Drukker J (1999) Progressive resistance training in neuromuscular patients. Effects on force and surface EMG. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 9:379–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC (2003) Evidence for strength imbalances as a significant contributor to abnormal synergies in hemiparetic subjects. Muscle Nerve 27:211–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC (2004) Evidence for improved muscle activation patterns after retraining of reaching movements with the MIME robotic system in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 12(2):186–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea PH, Eng JJ, Hodgson AJ (2005) Saturated muscle activation contributes to compensatory reaching strategies following stroke. J Neurophysiol 94(5):2999–3008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen SM, Dannenbaum R, Levin MF (2006) Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: randomized control trial. Stroke 37(1):186–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moritani T, deVries HA (1979) Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Phys Med 58:115–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Musampa NK, Mathieu PA, Levin MF (2007) Relationship between stretch reflex thresholds and voluntary arm muscle activation in patients with spasticity. Exp Brain Res 181(4):579–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newsam CJ, Baker LL (2004) Effect of an electrical stimulation facilitation program on quadriceps motor unit recruitment after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:2040–2045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford OM (1988) Muscular coordination and strength training: implications for injury rehabilitation. Sports Med 5:196–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sale DG (1988) Neural adaptation to resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 20(5):S135–S145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkjaer T, Magnussen I (1994) Passive, intrinsic and reflex-mediated stiffness in the ankle extensors of hemiparetic patients. Brain 117(Pt 2):355–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens JA, Garnett R, Buller NP (1978) Reversal of recruitment order of single motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation during voluntary muscle contraction in man. Nature 272(5651):362–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JE, Walter GA, Okereke E, Scarborough MT, Esterhai JL, George SZ et al (2004) Muscle adaptations with immobilisation and rehabilitation after ankle fracture. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36(10):1695–1701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JE, Pathare NC, Tillman SM, Scarborough MT, Gibbs CP, Shah P et al (2006) Relative contributions of muscle activation and muscle size to plantarflexor torque during rehabilitation after immobilization. J Orthop Res 24(8):1729–1736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner JM, Dromerick AW, Sahrmann SA, Lang CE (2007) Upper extremity muscle activation during recovery of reaching in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis. Clin Neurophysiol 118(1):164–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Blanton S, Edelman J, Lehrer N, Schroeder D (1994) Overcoming limitations in elbow movement in the presence of antagonist hyperactivity. Phys Ther 74(9):826–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Discipline of Physiotherapy, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

    Ruth Nancy Barker

  2. Division of Physiotherapy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Ruth Nancy Barker & Sandra Brauer

  3. School of Psychology, Queen’s University, Belfast, Ireland

    Richard Carson

  4. School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Richard Carson

Authors
  1. Ruth Nancy Barker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandra Brauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Carson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Nancy Barker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barker, R.N., Brauer, S. & Carson, R. Training-induced changes in the pattern of triceps to biceps activation during reaching tasks after chronic and severe stroke. Exp Brain Res 196, 483–496 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1872-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1872-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation