Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of object contact during grasping

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The maximum grip aperture (MGA) during prehension is linearly related to the size of objects to be grasped and is adapted to the haptically sensed object size when there is a discrepancy between visual and haptic information. We have investigated what information is used to drive this adaptation process and how the onset of fingertip forces on the object is triggered. Subjects performed a reach-to-grasp task, where the object seen and the object grasped physically never were the same. We measured the movements of the index finger and the thumb and the contact forces between each fingertip and the object. The subjects’ adaptation of the MGA was unrelated both to different fingertip velocities at the moment of object contact, or the fingertip forces. Instead, the ‘timing’ of contact between the fingers and the object was most consistently influenced by introducing a size discrepancy. Specifically, if the object was larger than expected, the moment of contact occurred earlier, and if the object was decreased in size, then the contact occurred later. During adaptation, these timing differences were markedly reduced. Also, the motor command for applying forces on the object seemed to be released in anticipation of the predicted moment of contact. We therefore conclude that the CNS dynamically predicts when contact between the fingertips and objects occur and that aperture adaptation is primarily driven by timing prediction errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aschersleben G, Gehrke J, Prinz W (2001) Tapping with peripheral nerve block. A role for tactile feedback in the timing of movements. Exp Brain Res 136:331–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berryman LJ, Yau JM, Hsiao SS (2006) Representation of object size in the somatosensory system. J Neurophysiol 96:27–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biegstraaten M, Smeets JB, Brenner E (2003) Impact forces cannot explain the one-target advantage in rapid aimed hand movements. Hum Mov Sci 22:365–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biegstraaten M, Smeets JB, Brenner E (2005) The relation between force and movement when grasping an object with a precision grip. Exp Brain Res 171:347–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birznieks I, Jenmalm P, Goodwin AW, Johansson RS (2001) Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents. J Neurosci 21:8222–8237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill A, Hopkins B, Rönnqvist L, Vogt S (2000) Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:81–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edin BB, Essick GK, Trulsson M, Olsson KA (1995) Receptor encoding of moving tactile stimuli in humans. I. Temporal pattern of discharge of individual low-threshold mechanoreceptors. J Neurosci 15:830–847

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Toni I, Chieffi S, Saetti MC (1995) Unconscious updating of grasp motor program. Exp Brain Res 105:291–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Toni I, Daprati E, Gangitano M (1997) Tactile input of the hand and the control of reaching to grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 114:130–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Gangitano M (1998) Haptic information differentially interferes with visual analysis in reaching-grasping control and in perceptual processes. NeuroReport 9:887–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA (2001) Different spaces and different times for perception and action. Prog Brain Res 134:313–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Johansson RS, Westling G (1991a) Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 83:477–482

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Johansson RS, Westling G (1991b) Integration of sensory information during the programming of precision grip: comments on the contributions of size cues. Exp Brain Res 85:226–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235–254

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenmalm P, Johansson RS (1997) Visual and somatosensory information about object shape control manipulative fingertip forces. J Neurosci 17:4486–4499

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Birznieks I (2004) First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events. Nat Neurosci 7:170–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56:550–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G (1987) Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 66:141–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G, Backstrom A, Flanagan JR (2001) Eye–hand coordination in object manipulation. J Neurosci 21:6917–6932

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Land MF, Hayhoe M (2001) In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Res 41:3559–3565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, MacKenzie CL, Athénes S (1990) Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Mov Sci 9:149–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauk MD, Buonomano DV (2004) The neural basis of temporal processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:307–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin E, Bortolami SB, DiZio P, Lackner JR (1999) Haptic stabilization of posture: changes in arm proprioception and cutaneous feedback for different arm orientations. J Neurophysiol 82:3541–3549

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rand MK, Lemay M, Squire LM, Shimansky YP, Stelmach GE (2007) Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 181:447–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robles-De-La-Torre G, Hayward V (2001) Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature 412:445–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Säfström D, Edin BB (2004) Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans. Learn Mem 11:356–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Säfström D, Edin BB (2005) Short-term plasticity of the visuomotor map during grasping movements in humans. Learn Mem 12:67–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Säfström D, Edin BB (2006) Acquiring and adapting a novel audiomotor map in human grasping. Exp Brain Res 173:487–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JB, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Motor Control 3:237–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, McCollum G (1983) The relation between linear extent and velocity in drawing movements. Neuroscience 10:211–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Schneider R (1991) A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17:198–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt C, Bock O (2007) Adaptation of grasping responses to distorted object size and orientation. Exp Brain Res 181:139–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westling G, Johansson RS (1984) Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53:277–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (projects 08667 and K2006-04X-20031-01-3) and the 6th Framework Program of EU (IST-001917, IST-028056). We thank Anders Bäckström and Göran Westling for technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Säfström.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Säfström, D., Edin, B.B. Prediction of object contact during grasping. Exp Brain Res 190, 265–277 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1469-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1469-7

Keywords

Navigation