Abstract
The maximum grip aperture (MGA) during prehension is linearly related to the size of objects to be grasped and is adapted to the haptically sensed object size when there is a discrepancy between visual and haptic information. We have investigated what information is used to drive this adaptation process and how the onset of fingertip forces on the object is triggered. Subjects performed a reach-to-grasp task, where the object seen and the object grasped physically never were the same. We measured the movements of the index finger and the thumb and the contact forces between each fingertip and the object. The subjects’ adaptation of the MGA was unrelated both to different fingertip velocities at the moment of object contact, or the fingertip forces. Instead, the ‘timing’ of contact between the fingers and the object was most consistently influenced by introducing a size discrepancy. Specifically, if the object was larger than expected, the moment of contact occurred earlier, and if the object was decreased in size, then the contact occurred later. During adaptation, these timing differences were markedly reduced. Also, the motor command for applying forces on the object seemed to be released in anticipation of the predicted moment of contact. We therefore conclude that the CNS dynamically predicts when contact between the fingertips and objects occur and that aperture adaptation is primarily driven by timing prediction errors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aschersleben G, Gehrke J, Prinz W (2001) Tapping with peripheral nerve block. A role for tactile feedback in the timing of movements. Exp Brain Res 136:331–339
Berryman LJ, Yau JM, Hsiao SS (2006) Representation of object size in the somatosensory system. J Neurophysiol 96:27–39
Biegstraaten M, Smeets JB, Brenner E (2003) Impact forces cannot explain the one-target advantage in rapid aimed hand movements. Hum Mov Sci 22:365–376
Biegstraaten M, Smeets JB, Brenner E (2005) The relation between force and movement when grasping an object with a precision grip. Exp Brain Res 171:347–357
Birznieks I, Jenmalm P, Goodwin AW, Johansson RS (2001) Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents. J Neurosci 21:8222–8237
Churchill A, Hopkins B, Rönnqvist L, Vogt S (2000) Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:81–89
Edin BB, Essick GK, Trulsson M, Olsson KA (1995) Receptor encoding of moving tactile stimuli in humans. I. Temporal pattern of discharge of individual low-threshold mechanoreceptors. J Neurosci 15:830–847
Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Toni I, Chieffi S, Saetti MC (1995) Unconscious updating of grasp motor program. Exp Brain Res 105:291–303
Gentilucci M, Toni I, Daprati E, Gangitano M (1997) Tactile input of the hand and the control of reaching to grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 114:130–137
Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Gangitano M (1998) Haptic information differentially interferes with visual analysis in reaching-grasping control and in perceptual processes. NeuroReport 9:887–891
Goodale MA (2001) Different spaces and different times for perception and action. Prog Brain Res 134:313–331
Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Johansson RS, Westling G (1991a) Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 83:477–482
Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Johansson RS, Westling G (1991b) Integration of sensory information during the programming of precision grip: comments on the contributions of size cues. Exp Brain Res 85:226–229
Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199–208
Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235–254
Jenmalm P, Johansson RS (1997) Visual and somatosensory information about object shape control manipulative fingertip forces. J Neurosci 17:4486–4499
Johansson RS, Birznieks I (2004) First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events. Nat Neurosci 7:170–177
Johansson RS, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56:550–564
Johansson RS, Westling G (1987) Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 66:141–154
Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59–71
Johansson RS, Westling G, Backstrom A, Flanagan JR (2001) Eye–hand coordination in object manipulation. J Neurosci 21:6917–6932
Land MF, Hayhoe M (2001) In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Res 41:3559–3565
Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, MacKenzie CL, Athénes S (1990) Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Mov Sci 9:149–176
Mauk MD, Buonomano DV (2004) The neural basis of temporal processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:307–340
Rabin E, Bortolami SB, DiZio P, Lackner JR (1999) Haptic stabilization of posture: changes in arm proprioception and cutaneous feedback for different arm orientations. J Neurophysiol 82:3541–3549
Rand MK, Lemay M, Squire LM, Shimansky YP, Stelmach GE (2007) Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 181:447–60
Robles-De-La-Torre G, Hayward V (2001) Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature 412:445–448
Säfström D, Edin BB (2004) Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans. Learn Mem 11:356–363
Säfström D, Edin BB (2005) Short-term plasticity of the visuomotor map during grasping movements in humans. Learn Mem 12:67–74
Säfström D, Edin BB (2006) Acquiring and adapting a novel audiomotor map in human grasping. Exp Brain Res 173:487–497
Smeets JB, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Motor Control 3:237–271
Viviani P, McCollum G (1983) The relation between linear extent and velocity in drawing movements. Neuroscience 10:211–218
Viviani P, Schneider R (1991) A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17:198–218
Weigelt C, Bock O (2007) Adaptation of grasping responses to distorted object size and orientation. Exp Brain Res 181:139–146
Westling G, Johansson RS (1984) Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53:277–284
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (projects 08667 and K2006-04X-20031-01-3) and the 6th Framework Program of EU (IST-001917, IST-028056). We thank Anders Bäckström and Göran Westling for technical support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Säfström, D., Edin, B.B. Prediction of object contact during grasping. Exp Brain Res 190, 265–277 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1469-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1469-7