Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Novel muscle patterns for reaching after cervical spinal cord injury: a case for motor redundancy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fundamental issue in the neuromotor control of arm movements is whether the nervous system can use distinctly different muscle activity patterns to obtain similar kinematic outcomes. Although computer simulations have demonstrated several possible mechanical and torque solutions, there is little empirical evidence that the nervous system actually employs fundamentally different muscle patterns for the same movement, such as activating a muscle one time and not the next, or switching from a flexor to an extensor. Under typical conditions, subjects choose the same muscles for any given movement, which suggests that in order to see the capacity of the nervous system to make a different choice of muscles, the nervous system must be pushed beyond the normal circumstances. The purpose of this study, then, was to examine an atypical condition, reaching of cervical spinal cord injured (SCI) subjects who have a reduced repertoire of available distal arm muscles but otherwise a normal nervous system above the level of lesion. Electromyography and kinematics of the shoulder and elbow were examined in the SCI subjects performing a center-out task and then compared to neurologically normal control subjects. The findings showed that the SCI-injured subjects produced reaches with typical global kinematic features, such as straight finger paths, bell-shaped velocities, and joint excursions similar to control subjects. The SCI subjects, however, activated only the shoulder agonist muscle for all directions, unlike the control pattern that involved a reciprocal pattern at each joint (shoulder, elbow, and wrist). Nonetheless, the SCI subjects could activate their shoulder antagonist muscles, elbow flexors, and wrist extensor (extensor carpi radialis) for isometric tasks, but did not activate them during the reaching movements. These results demonstrate that for reaching movements, the SCI subjects used a strikingly different pattern of intact muscle activities than control subjects. Hence, the findings imply that the nervous system is capable of choosing either the control pattern or the SCI pattern. We would speculate that control subjects do not select the SCI pattern because the different choice of muscles results in kinematic features (reduced fingertip speed, multiple shoulder accelerations) other than the global features that are somehow less advantageous or efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1A–H
Fig. 2A–B
Fig. 3A–G
Fig. 4A–F
Fig. 5A–B
Fig. 6
Fig. 7A–B
Fig. 8A–B

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Inadvertently, the high cut-off was unusually restricted. However, EMG power spectral analyses and testing of our equipment demonstrated that this band pass did not alter our measures of EMG (presence or absence of EMG signal and timing of bursts).

  2. Typically, multiple peaks also occurred in the traces of elbow joint acceleration but were not necessarily coincident with the multiple peaks in shoulder joint acceleration.

References

  • Acosta AM, Kirsch RF, van der Helm FCT (2001) Three-dimensional shoulder kinematics in individuals with C5–C6 spinal cord injury. Proc Inst Mech Eng 215:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Admiraal MA, Medendorp WP, Gielen CC (2002) Three-dimensional head and upper arm orientations during kinematically redundant movements and at rest. Exp Brain Res 142:181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida GL, Hong D, Corcos D, Gottlieb GL (1995) Organizing principles for voluntary movement: extending single-joint rules. J Neurophysiol 74:1374–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM (1985) Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5:2318–2330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Au ATC, Kirsch RF (2000) EMG-based prediction of shoulder and elbow kinematics in able-bodied and SCI individuals. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 8:471–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian AJ, Zackowski KM, Thach WT (2000) Cerebellar ataxia: torque deficiency or torque mismatch between joints? J Neurophysiol 83:3019–3030

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beer RF, Dewald JPA, Rymer WZ (2000) Deficits in the coordination of multijoint arm movements in patients with hemiparesis: evidence for disturbed control of limb dynamics. Exp Brain Res 131(3):305–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein NA (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein NA (1996) Essay 6: On exercise and motor skill. In: Latash ML, Turvey MT (eds) Dexterity and its development. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 171–205

  • van Bolhuis BM, Gielen CCAM (1997) The relative activation of elbow flexor muscles in isometric flexion and in flexion/extension movements. J Biomech 30:803–811

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bolhuis BM, Gielen CCAM (1999) A comparison of models explaining muscle activation patterns for isometric contractions. Biol Cybern 81:249–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouisset S, Lestienne F, Maton B (1977) The stability of synergy in agonists during execution of a simple movement. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 42:543–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchannan TS, Almdale DPJ, Lewis JL, Rymer WZ (1986) Characteristics of synergic relations during isometric contractions of human elbow muscles. J Neurophysiol 56:1225–1241

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buneo CA, Soechting JF, Flanders M (1994) Muscle activation patterns for reaching: the representation of distance and time. J Neurophysiol 71:1546–1558

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke JD, Virji-Babul N (1995) Reprogramming of muscle activation patterns at the wrist in compensation for elbow reaction torques during planar two-joint movements. Exp Brain Res 106:169–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey NJ, Ellaway PH, Friedland DL, Short DJ (1990) Motor unit discharge characteristics and short term synchrony in paraplegic humans. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53:764–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Dounskaia NV, Swinnen SP, Walter CB, Spaepen AJ, Verschuteren SMP (1998) Hierarchical control of different elbow–wrist coordination patterns. Exp Brain Res 121(3):239–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway CG, Koshland G (2002) General coordination of shoulder, elbow and wrist dynamics during multijoint arm movements. Exp Brain Res 142:163–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway CG, Bhat A, Heathcock JC, Manal K (2004) Shoulder and elbow joint power differ as a general feature of vertical arm movements. Exp Brain Res 157:391–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1994) Accuracy of planar reaching movements II: systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Exp Brain Res 99:112–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (1999) Compensation for interaction torques during single-and multijoint limb movement. J Neurophysiol 82:2310–2326

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gronley JK, Newsam GJ, Mulroy SJ, Rao SS, Perry J, Helm M (2000) Electromyographic and kinematic analysis of the shoulder during four activities of daily living in men with C6 tetraplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev 37:423–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirashima M, Kudo K, Ohtsuki T (2003a) Utilization and compensation of interaction torques during ball-throwing movements. J Neurophysiol 89:1784–1796

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirashima M, Ohgane K, Kudo K, Hase K, Ohtsuki T (2003b) The counteractive relationship between the interaction torque and muscle torque at the wrist joint is predestined in ball-throwing. J Neurophysiol 90:1449–1463

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern 44:67–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard JD, Hoit JD, Enoka RM, Hasan Z (1986) Relative activation of two human elbow flexors under isometric conditions: a cautionary note concerning flexor equivalence. Exp Brain Res 62:199–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Karst GM, Hasan Z (1991) Timing and magnitude of electromyographic activity for two-joint arm movements in different directions. J Neurophysiol 66:1594–1604

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketcham CJ, Dounskaia NV, Stelmach GE (2004) Multijoint movement control: the importance of interactive torques. Prog Brain Res 143: 207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Koike Y, Kawato M (1995) Estimation of dynamic joint torques and trajectory formation from surface electromyography signals using a neural network model. Biol Cybern 73:291–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshland GF, Galloway CG (1998) A novel muscle strategy for normal-like kinematics of arm reaching in a person after spinal-cord-injury. Soc Neurosci Abstr 24:1665

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshland GF, Marasli B, Arabyan A (1999) Directional effects of changes in muscle torques on initial path during simulated reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 128:353–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshland GF, Galloway JC, Nevoret-Bell J (2000) Control of the wrist in three-joint arm movements to multiple directions in the horizontal plane. J Neurophysiol 83:3188–3195

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulig K, Craig JN, Mulroy SJ, Rao S, Gronley JK, Bontrager EL, Perry J (2001) The effect of level of spinal cord injury on shoulder joint kinetics during manual wheelchair propulsion. Clin Biomech 16:744–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont I, Briand E, Dizien O, Combeaud M, Bussel B, Revol M, Roby-Brami A (2000) Kinematics of prehension and pointing movements in C6 quadriplegic patients. Spinal Cord 38:354–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (1988) Spectral analysis of the electromyogram (EMG) in spinal cord trauma patients: I. Different types of the EMG and corresponding spectra. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 28:319–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Jaric S (1998) Instruction-dependent muscle activation patterns within a two-joint synergy: separating mechanics from neurophysiology. J Motor Behav 30:194–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestienne F (1979) Effects of inertial load and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements. Exp Brain Res 35:407–418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lestienne F, Pertuzon E (1974) Determination, in situ, de las visco-elastcite du muscle humain inactive. Eur J Appl Physiol 32:159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Mah CD (2001) Spatial and temporal modulation of joint stiffness during multijoint movement. Exp Brain Res 136:492–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Marciello MA, Herbison GJ, Cohen ME, Schmidt R (1995) Elbow extension using anterior deltoids and upper pectorals in spinal cord-injured subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76:426–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osu R, Gomi H (1999) Multijoint muscle regulation mechanisms examined by measured human arm stiffness and EMG signals. J Neurophysiol 81:1458–1468

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigeon P, Bortolami SM, DiZio P, Lackner JR (2003) Coordinated turn-and-reach movements. I. Anticipatory compensation for self-generated coriolis and interaction torques. J Neurophysiol 89:276–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Reft J, Hasan Z (2002) Trajectories of target reaching arm movements in individual with spinal cord injury: effect of external support. Spinal Cord 40:186–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabes PN (2000) The planning and control of reaching movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:740–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sainburg RL, Ghilardi M, Poizner H, Ghez C (1995) Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. J Neurophysiol 73:820–835

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sainburg RL, Lateiner JE, Latash ML, Bagesteiro LB (2003) Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent. J Neurophysiol 89:401–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarver JJ, Smith BT, Seliktar R, Mulcahey MJ, Betz RR (1999) A study of shoulder motions as a control source for adolescents with C4 level SCI. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 7:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Seelen HAM, Potten YJM, Drukker J, Reulen JPH, Pons C (1998) Development of new muscles synergies in postural control in SCI subjects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 8:23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simard TG, Ladd HW (1971) Differential control of muscle segments by quadriplegic patients: an electromyographic procedural investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 52(10): 447–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Flanders M (1991) Arm movements in three-dimensional space: computation, theory and observation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 19:389–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CK, del Valle A (2001) The role of motor unit rate modulations versus recruitment in repeated submaximal voluntary contractions performed by control and SCI subjects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 11:217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Topka H, Konczak J, Schneider K, Boose A, Dichgans J (1998) Multijoint arm movements in cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of movement dynamics. Exp Brain Res 119:493–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS (1991) Definition of complete spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 29:573–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegner AW, Wierzbicka MM, Davies L, Young RR (1993) Discharge properties of single motor units in patients with spinal cord injuries. Muscle Nerve 16:661–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka MM, Wiegner AW (1992) Effects of weak antagonist on fast elbow flexion movements in man. Exp Brain Res 91:509–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka MM, Wiegner AW (1996) Accuracy of motor responses in subject with and without control of antagonist muscle. J Neurophysiol 75:2533–2541

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerby SA, Herbison GJ, Marino RJ, Cohen ME, Schmidt RR (1994) Elbow extension using the anterior deltoids and the upper pectorals. Muscle Nerve 17:1472–1474

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA

    Gail F. Koshland & Becky Farley

  2. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA

    James C. Galloway

Authors
  1. Gail F. Koshland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James C. Galloway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Becky Farley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gail F. Koshland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koshland, G.F., Galloway, J.C. & Farley, B. Novel muscle patterns for reaching after cervical spinal cord injury: a case for motor redundancy. Exp Brain Res 164, 133–147 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2218-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2218-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation