Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptation to a novel multi-force environment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humans display accurate limb behavior when they move in familiar environments composed of many simultaneously-acting forces. Little is known about how multi-force environments are represented and whether this process partitions between the underlying force components, reflects the net forces present, or is cued to the force-context. We tested between these three main alternatives by examining how reaching movements adapt to a novel multi-force field composed of a velocity-dependent force and a constant force. These hypotheses were dissociated first by making the constant force larger and oppositely-oriented to the velocity-dependent force; thereby, the net force was always opposite the velocity-dependent component. Second, we tested adaptation with all novel forces removed to eliminate any potential cues for the force-context. In two experiments that used forces perpendicular or parallel to the forward movement direction, we found adaptation aftereffects consistent with a mechanism that partitioned the velocity-dependent component from the net force field. Specifically, we found aftereffects opposite the rightward or resistive velocity-dependent component of the multi-force field, even though the net force imposed was leftward or assistive, respectively. An additional experiment suggested that the velocity-dependent component is partitioned relative to the background load in a limb-based coordinate frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–c
Fig. 2
Fig. 3a–i
Fig. 4a–i
Fig. 5a–i
Fig. 6a–b
Fig. 7
Fig. 8a–b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM (1985) Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5:2318–2330

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroni G, Pedrocchi A, Ferrigno G, Massion J, Pedotti A (2001) Static and dynamic postural control in long-term microgravity: evidence of a dual adaptation. J Appl Physiol 90:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett DJ (1994) Stretch reflex responses in the human elbow joint during a voluntary movement. J Physiol 474:339–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger M, Mescheriakov S, Molokanova E, Lechner-Steinleitner S, Seguer N, Kozlovskaya I (1997) Pointing arm movements in short- and long-term spaceflights. Aviat Space Environ Med 68:781–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore SJ, Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM (1998) Predicting the consequences of our own actions: the role of sensorimotor context estimation. J Neurosci 18:7511–7518

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabel DW, Cisek P, Scott SH (2001) Neural activity in primary motor cortex related to mechanical loads applied to the shoulder and elbow during a postural task. J Neurophysiol 86:2102–2108

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn JV, DiZio P, Lackner JR (2000) Reaching during virtual rotation: context specific compensations for expected Coriolis forces. J Neurophysiol 83:3230–3240

    Google Scholar 

  • DiZio P, Lackner JR (1995) Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. J Neurophysiol 74:1787–1792

    Google Scholar 

  • DiZio P, Lackner JR (2000) Congenitally blind individuals rapidly adapt to Coriolis force perturbations of their reaching movements. J Neurophysiol 84:2175–2180

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk J, Lackner JR, DiZio P (1993) Gravitoinertial force level influences arm movement control. J Neurophysiol 69:504–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders M, Herrmann U (1992) Two components of muscle activation: scaling with the speed of arm movement. J Neurophysiol 67:931–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E (1996) Motor learning by field approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3843–3846

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM (1998) Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. J Neurophysiol 79:1825–1838

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1994) Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res 99:97–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Song Q, Almeida GL, Hong DA, Corcos D (1997) Directional control of planar human arm movement. J Neurophysiol 78:2985–2998

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribble PL, Scott SH (2002) Overlap of internal models in motor cortex for mechanical loads during reaching. Nature 417:938–941

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern 44:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2002) Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Exp Brain Res 143:520–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingma I, Savelsbergh GJ, Tousaint HM (1999) Object size effects on initial lifting forces under microgravity conditions. Exp Brain Res 124:422–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (2000) Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20:8916–8924

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR, DiZio P (1992) Rapid adaptation of arm movement endpoints and trajectory to Coriolis force perturbations. Soc Neurosci Abstr 19:1595

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR, DiZio P (1994) Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol 72:299–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner JR, DiZio P (2000) Human orientation and movement control in weightless and artificial gravity environments. Exp Brain Res 130:2–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Malfait N, Shiller DM, Ostry DJ (2002) Transfer of motor learning across arm configurations. J Neurosci 22:9656–9660

    Google Scholar 

  • Messier J, Kalaska JF (1999) Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 125:139–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen DM, Kaminski TR, Gordon AM (2003) The effect of body orientation on a point-to-point movement in healthy elderly persons. Am J Occup Ther 57:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishikawa KC, Murray ST, Flanders M (1999) Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching? J Neurophysiol 81:2582–2586

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, Popov KE, McIntyre J (1998a) Hand trajectories of vertical arm movements in one-G and zero-G environments. Evidence for a central representation of gravitational force. Exp Brain Res 120:496–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, Vinter A, Grishin A (1998b) The representation of gravitational force during drawing movements of the arm. Exp Brain Res 120:233–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainburg RL, Ghez C, Kalakanis D (1999) Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 81:1045–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Seki K, Perlmutter SI, Fetz EE (2003) Sensory input to primate spinal cord is presynaptically inhibited during voluntary movement. Nat Neurosci 6:1309–1316

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadmehr R, Moussavi ZM (2000) Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements. J Neurosci 20:7807–7815

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro MB, Gottlieb GL, Moore CG, Corcos DM (2002) Electromyographic responses to an unexpected load in fast voluntary movements: descending regulation of segmental reflexes. J Neurophysiol 88:1059–1063

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro MB, Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM (2004) EMG responses to an unexpected load in fast movements are delayed with an increase in the expected movement time. J Neurophysiol 91:2135–2147

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Buneo CA, Herrmann U, Flanders M (1995) Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders’ law apply to arm movement? J Neurosci 15:6271–6280

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R (2000) Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407:742–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong C, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2002) Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study. J Neurosci 22:1108–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernazza-Martin S, Martin N, Massion J (2000) Kinematic synergy adaptation to microgravity during forward trunk movement. J Neurophysiol 83:453–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Virji-Babul N, Cooke JD, Brown SH (1994) Effects of gravitational forces on single joint arm movements in humans. Exp Brain Res 99:338–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada Y, Kawabata Y, Kotosaka S, Yamamoto K, Kitazawa S, Kawato M (2003) Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields. Neurosci Res 46:319–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Sainburg RL (2004) Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. J Neurophysiol 92:349–360

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration grants: NAG9-1263; NAG9-1483.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isaac Kurtzer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurtzer, I., DiZio, P.A. & Lackner, J.R. Adaptation to a novel multi-force environment. Exp Brain Res 164, 120–132 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2216-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2216-y

Keywords

Navigation