Skip to main content
Log in

Velocity and curvature in human locomotion along complex curved paths: a comparison with hand movements

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is extensive experimental evidence linking instantaneous velocity to curvature in drawing and hand-writing movements. The empirical relationship between these characteristics of motion and path is well described by a power law in which the velocity varies in proportion to the one-third power of the radius of curvature. It was recently shown that a similar relationship can be observed during locomotion along curved elliptical paths raising the possibility that these very different motor activities might, at some level, share the same planning strategies. It has, however, been noted that the ellipse is a special case with respect to the one-third power law and therefore these previous results might not provide strong evidence that the one-third power law is a general feature of locomotion around curved paths. For this reason the experimental study of locomotion and its comparison with hand writing is extended here to non-elliptical paths. Subjects walked along predefined curved paths consisting of two complex shapes drawn on the ground: the cloverleaf and the limacon. It was found that the data always supported a close relationship between instantaneous velocity and curvature. For these more complex paths, however, the relationship is shape-dependent—although velocity and curvature can still be linked by a power law, the exponent depends on the geometrical form of the path. The results demonstrate the existence of a close relationship between instantaneous velocity and curvature in locomotion that is more general than the one-third power law. The origins of this relationship and its possible explanation in the mechanical balance of forces and in central planning are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abend W, Bizzi E, Morasso P (1982) Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105:331–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavagna GA, Margaria R (1966) Mechanics of walking. J Appl Physiol 21:271–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheron G, Draye JP, Bengoetxea A, Dan B (1999) Kinematics invariance in multi-directional complex movements in free space: effect of changing direction. Clin Neurophysiol 110:757–764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courtine G, Schieppati M (2003) Human walking along a curved path. I. Body trajectory, segment orientation and the effect of vision. Eur J Neurosci 18:177–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de’Sperati C, Viviani P (1997) The relationship between curvature and velocity in two-dimensional smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurosci 17:3932–3945

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5:1688–1703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso R, Glasauer S, Takei Y, Berthoz A (1996) The predictive brain: anticipatory control of head direction for the steering of locomotion. Neuroreport 7:1170–1174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso R, Prevost P, Ivanenko YP, Berthoz A (1998) Eye-head coordination for the steering of locomotion in humans : an anticipatory strategy. Neurosci Lett 253:115–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene PR (1985) Running on flat turns : experiments, theory, and applications. J Biomech Eng 107:96–103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (1996) Origins of the power law relation between movement velocity and curvature: modeling the effects of muscle mechanics and limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol 76:2853–2860

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris MH, Wolpert DM (1998) Signal-dependant noise determines motor planning. Nature 394:780–784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imai T, Moore ST, Raphan T, Cohen B (2001) Interaction of body, head, and eyes during walking and turning. Exp Brain Res 136:1–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanenko YP, Grasso R, Macellari V, Lacquaniti F (2002) Two-thirds power law in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces. Neuroreport 13:1171–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kawato M, Maeda Y, Uno Y, Suzuki R (1990) Trajectory formation of arm movement by cascade neural network model based on minimum torque-change criterion. Biol Cyber 62:275–288

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lacquaniti F, Terzuolo C, Viviani P (1983) The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychol 54:115–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Land MF, Lee DN (1994) Where we look when we steer. Nature 369:742–744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JM, Beall AC (1998) Visually controlled locomotion: its dependence on optic flow, three-dimensional space perception, and cognition. Ecol Psychol 10:271–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey JT, Lurito JT, Pellizzer G, Georgopoulos AP (1992) Three-dimensional drawings in isometric conditions: relation between geometry and kinematics. Exp Brain Res 88:685–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reina GA, Schwartz AB (2003) Eye-hand coupling during closed-loop drawing: evidence of shared motor planning? Hum Mov Sci 22:137–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson MJ, Flash T (2002) Comparing smooth arm movements with the two-thirds power law and the related segmented-control hypothesis. J Neurosci 22:8201–8211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaal S, Sternad D (2001) Origins and violations of the 2/3 power law in rhythmic three-dimensional arm movements. Exp Brain Res 136:60–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz AB, Moran DW (1999) Motor cortical activity during drawing movements : population representation during lemniscate tracing. J Neurophysiol 82:2705–2718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sternad D, Schaal S (1999) Segmentation of endpoint trajectories does not imply segmented control. Exp Brain Res 124:118–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov E, Jordan MI (1998) Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. J Neurophysiol 80:696–714

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vieilledent S, Kerlirzin Y, Dalbera S, Berthoz A (2001) Relationship between velocity and curvature of a locomotor trajectory in human. Neurosci Lett 305:65–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Cenzato M (1985) Segmentation and coupling in complex movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perf 11:828–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Flash T (1995) Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perf 21:32–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Stucchi N (1989) The effect of movement velocity on form perception: geometric illusions in dynamic displays. Percept Psychophys 46:266–274

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Stucchi N (1992) Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perf 18:603–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Terzuolo C (1982) Trajectory determines movement dynamics. Neuroscience 7:431–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wann JP, Nimmo-Smith I, Wing AM (1988) Relation between velocity and curvature in movement: equivalence and divergence between a power law and a minimum-jerk model. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perf 14:622–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warren WH, Kay BA, Zosh WD, Duchon AP, Sahuc S (2001) Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nat Neurosci 4:213–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie RM, Wann JP (2003) Eye-movements aid the control of locomotion. J Vision 3:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems PA, Cavagna GA, Heglund NC (1995) External, internal and total work in human locomotion. J Exp Biol 198:379–393

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank S. Dalbera and T. Ducourant for their technical assistance during the experiments and F. Maloumian for the graphs. This study was supported by a grant “Cognitique Thème Action” from the French Ministry of Research (MENRT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Hicheur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hicheur, H., Vieilledent, S., Richardson, M.J.E. et al. Velocity and curvature in human locomotion along complex curved paths: a comparison with hand movements. Exp Brain Res 162, 145–154 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2122-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2122-8

Keywords

Navigation