Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The stimulus integration area for horizontal vergence

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over what region of space are horizontal disparities integrated to form the stimulus for vergence? The vergence system might be expected to respond to disparities within a small area of interest to bring them into the range of precise stereoscopic processing. However, the literature suggests that disparities are integrated over a fairly large parafoveal area. We report the results of six experiments designed to explore the spatial characteristics of the stimulus for vergence. Binocular eye movements were recorded using magnetic search coils. Each dichoptic display consisted of a central target stimulus that the subject attempted to fuse, and a competing stimulus with conflicting disparity. In some conditions the target was stationary, providing a fixation stimulus. In other conditions, the disparity of the target changed to provide a vergence-tracking stimulus. The target and competing stimulus were combined in a variety of conditions including those in which (1) a transparent textured-disc target was superimposed on a competing textured background, (2) a textured-disc target filled the centre of a competing annular background, and (3) a small target was presented within the centre of a competing annular background of various inner diameters. In some conditions the target and competing stimulus were separated in stereoscopic depth. The results are consistent with a disparity integration area with a diameter of about 5°. Stimuli beyond this integration area can drive vergence in their own right, but they do not appear to be summed or averaged with a central stimulus to form a combined disparity signal. A competing stimulus had less effect on vergence when separated from the target by a disparity pedestal. As a result, we propose that it may be more useful to think in terms of an integration volume for vergence rather than a two-dimensional retinal integration area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison RS, Howard IP, Fang X (2000). Depth selectivity of vertical fusional mechanisms. Vision Res 40:2985–2998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anstis SM (1974) Chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Res 14:589–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Badcock DR, Schor CM (1985) Depth–increment detection function for individual spatial channels. J Opt Soc Am A 2:1211–1215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burian HM (1939) Fusional movements: the role of peripheral retinal stimuli. Arch Ophthalmol 21:486–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Busettini C, Fitzgibbon EJ, Miles FA (2001) Short-latency disparity vergence in humans. J Neurophysiol 85:1129–1152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming BG, Parker AJ (1999) Binocular neurons in V1 of awake monkeys are selective for absolute, not relative, disparity. J Neurosci 19:5602–5618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards M, Pope DR, Schor CM (1998) Luminance contrast and spatial-frequency tuning of the transient-vergence system. Vision Res 38:705–717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francis EL, Owens DA (1983) The accuracy of binocular vergence for peripheral stimuli. Vision Res 23:13–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glennerster A (1998) dmax for stereopsis and motion in random dot displays. Vision Res 38:925–934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton DR, Kertesz AE (1983) Fusional vergence response to local peripheral stimulation. J Opt Soc Am 73:7–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP, Rogers BJ (2002) Seeing in depth. Vol 2: depth perception. I. Porteous, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP, Zacher JE (1991) Human cyclovergence as a function of stimulus frequency and amplitude. Exp Brain Res 85:445–450

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP, Sun L, Shen X (1994) Cycloversion and cyclovergence: the effects of the area and position of the visual display. Exp Brain Res 100:509–514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP, Fang X, Allison RS, Zacher JE (2000) Effects of stimulus size and eccentricity on horizontal and vertical vergence. Exp Brain Res 130:124–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hung GK, Semmlow JL, Sun L, Ciuffreda KJ (1991) Vergence control of central and peripheral disparities. Exp Neurol 113:202–211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones R, Stephens GL (1989). Horizontal fusional amplitudes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:1638–1642

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar T, Glaser DA (1995). Depth discrimination of a crowded line is better when it is more luminant than the lines crowding it. Vision Res 35:657–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mallot HA, Roll A, Arndt PA (1996) Disparity-evoked vergence is driven by interocular correlation. Vision Res 36:2925–2938.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pope DR, Edwards M, Schor CM (1999) Orientation and luminance polarity tuning of the transient-vergence system. Vision Res 39:575–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Popple AV, Smallman HS, Findlay JM (1998) The area of spatial integration for initial horizontal disparity vergence. Vision Res 38:319–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prince SJD, Cumming BG, Parker AJ (2002) Range and mechanism of horizontal disparity encoding in macaque V1. J Neurophysiol 87:209–221

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DA (1963) A method of measuring eye movement using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME 10:137–145

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sato M, Edwards M, Schor M (2001) Envelope size tuning for transient disparity vergence. Vision Res 41:1695–1707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson SB, Cormack LK, Schor CM, Tyler CW (1992) Disparity tuning in mechanisms of human stereopsis. Vision Res 32 1685–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson SB, Lott LA, Yang J (1997) The influence of subject instruction on horizontal and vertical vergence tracking. Vision Res 37:2891–2898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson SB, Reed PE, Yang J (1999). The effect of target size and eccentricity on reflex disparity vergence. Vision Res 39:823–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Von der Heydt R, Adorjani CS, Hänny P, Baumgartner G (1978). Disparity sensitivity and receptive field incongruity of units in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 31:523–545

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer G, McKee SP (1980) Stereogram design for testing local stereopsis. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 19:802–809

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer G, Tanzman IJ (1956) Qualitative depth localization with diplopic images. J Opt Soc Am 46:116–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winkelman JE (1951) Peripheral fusion. Arch Ophthalmol 45:425–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelman JE (1953) Central and peripheral fusion. Arch Ophthalmol 50:179–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, DS, FitzGibbon EJ, Miles FA. (2003) Short-latency disparity-vergence eye movements in humans: sensitivity to simulated orthogonal tropias. Vision Res 43:431–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support of NSERC Canada to I.P. Howard and R.S. Allison is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank Jim Zacher for his technical expertise and his assistance in running the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada

    Robert S. Allison, Ian P. Howard & Xueping Fang

Authors
  1. Robert S. Allison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ian P. Howard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xueping Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert S. Allison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allison, R.S., Howard, I.P. & Fang, X. The stimulus integration area for horizontal vergence. Exp Brain Res 156, 305–313 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1790-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1790-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation