Skip to main content
Log in

Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with continuous spatial cues

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have investigated the effect of directional uncertainty on the planning of reaching movements. For this purpose, we have used sections of annuli as spatial cues to indicate the directional range within which the target would be presented. The results showed that the reaction time of the reaching response increased with cue range and with the angle between the center of the cue and the target. In addition, the initial direction of movement was biased toward the center of the cue. These results conformed to the predictions of the capacity-sharing model. This model assumes that the processing resources used for motor planning are limited and distributed as a function of the range of directions indicated by the cue, and that when the target appears, these resources are reallocated to represent the response to be executed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basso MA, Wurtz RH (1998) Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes of target probability. J Neurosci 15:7519–7534

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian A, Riehle A, Erlhagen W, Schöner G (1998) Prior information preshapes the population representation of movement direction in motor cortex. Neuroreport 9:315–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bock O, Arnold K (1992) Motor control prior to movement onset: preparatory mechanisms for pointing at visual targets. Exp Brain Res 90:209–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borowski EJ, Borwein JM (1991) The HarperCollins dictionary of mathematics. HarperCollins, New York

  • Castiello U, Umiltà C (1990) Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. Acta Psychol 73:195–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett CW (1955) A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Statist Assoc 50:1096–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen CW, Yeh YY (1985) Allocation of attention in the visual field. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:583–597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erlhagen W, Schöner G (2002) Dynamic field theory of movement preparation. Psychol Rev 109:545–572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Q-G, Suarez JI, Ebner TJ (1993) Neuronal specification of direction and distance during reaching movements in the superior precentral premotor area and primary motor cortex of monkeys. J Neurophysiol 70:2097–2116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos AP, Pellizzer G (1995) The mental and the neural: psychological and neural studies of mental rotation and memory scanning. Neuropsychologia 33:1531–1547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghez C, Favilla M, Ghilardi MF, Gordon J, Bermejo R, Pullman S (1997) Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories. Exp Brain Res 115:217–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee D (1999) Effects of exogenous and endogenous attention on visually guided hand movements. Cogn Brain Res 8:143–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Longstreth LE, El-Zahhar N, Alcorn MB (1985) Exceptions to Hick’s law: explorations with a response duration measure. J Exp Psychol Gen 114:417–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luce RD (1986) Response times. Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford Science Publications, New York

  • Pellizzer G (1997) Transformation of the intended direction of movement during continuous motor trajectories. Neuroreport 8:3447–3452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellizzer G, Hedges JH (2003) Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with discrete spatial cues. Exp Brain Res. DOI 10.1007/s00221-003-1453-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Podgorny P, Shepard RN (1983) Distribution of visual attention over space. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 9:380–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff R (1993) Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychol Bull 114:510–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riehle A, Requin J (1989) Monkey primary motor and premotor cortex: single-cell activity related to prior information about direction and extent of an intended movement. J Neurophysiol 61:534–549

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riehle A, Requin J (1995) Neuronal correlates of the specification of movement direction and force in four cortical areas of the monkey. Behav Brain Res 70:1–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA (1980) Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:444–474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford A (2001) Introducing ANOVA and ANCOVA. A GLM Approach. Sage, London

  • Shaw ML (1978) A capacity allocation model for reaction time. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 4:586–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA

  • Tipper SP, Howard LA, Houghton G (1998) Action-based mechanisms of attention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:1385–1393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Merit Review Award from the Medical Research Service of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. We thank Matt Chafee for his comments on a previous version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Pellizzer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pellizzer, G., Hedges, J.H. Motor planning: effect of directional uncertainty with continuous spatial cues. Exp Brain Res 154, 121–126 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1669-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1669-0

Keywords

Navigation