Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of short-term, constant practice on the kinematics of a multi-joint pointing movement were studied in the hemiparetic arm of 20 chronic patients with unilateral left cerebro-vascular accident (CVA) and in 10 age- and sex-matched healthy individuals. Practice consisted of a single session of 70 pointing movements made with the right arm. Movements were made from a target located beside the body to one in the contralateral workspace, in front of the body. Vision of the final hand position was allowed after every 5th trial. At the beginning of practice, stroke patients made slower, less precise and more segmented movements, characterised by smaller active ranges of elbow and shoulder motion, disrupted elbow–shoulder coordination, as well as greater trunk movement compared with healthy subjects. With practice, healthy subjects and some patients made faster and more precise movements. These tendencies were revealed only after many repetitions (up to 55 for those with severe hemiparesis), whereas changes in healthy individuals occurred after fewer trials (approximately 20). In addition, the patients decreased movement segmentation with practice. In healthy subjects, faster movement times may be attributed to better shoulder/elbow movement timing in the first half of the reach, whereas improvement of precision was not correlated with any changes in the movement variables. In patients, improvements were accomplished differently depending on arm motor severity. For some patients with mild-to-moderate clinical symptoms, practice resulted in better timing of shoulder/elbow movements with less trunk rotation in middle to late reach. Patients with more severe impairment also improved shoulder/elbow movement timing in mid-reach but used more compensatory trunk rotation. The results suggest that even one session of repetitive practice of a multi-joint pointing task leads to improvements in movement performance-based outcome measures, but the mechanisms of improvement may vary with the individual's level of motor impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2A–C.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4A, B.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ada L, Canning CG, Carr JH, Kilbreath SL, Shepherd RD (1994) Task-specific training of reaching and manipulation. In: Bennett KMB, Castiello U (eds) Insights into the reach to grasp movement. (Advances in psychology, 105) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 239–265

  • Adamovich SV, Berkinblit MB, Fookson OI, Poizner H (1998) Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. I. Kinesthetic versus visual target presentation. J Neurophysiol 73:2833–2846

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams JA (1971) A closed-loop theory of motor learning. J Mot Behav 3:111–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews K, Brocklehurst JC, Richards B, Laycock PJ (1981) The rate of recovery from stroke and its measurement. Int Rehab Med 3:155–161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bach-y-Rita P (1981) Brain plasticity as a basis of the development of rehabilitation procedures for hemiplegia. Scand J Rehab Med 13:73–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basmajian JV (1977) Motor learning and control: a working hypothesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 58:38–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berardelli A, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Kachi T, Marsden CD (1984) Duration of the first agonist burst in ballistic arm movements. Brain Res 304:183–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berkinblit MB, Fookson OI, Smetanin B, Adamovich SV, Poizner H (1995) The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets. Exp Brain Res 107:326–330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bilodeau EA, Bilodeau IM (1958) Variable frequency knowledge of results and the learning of a simple skill. J Exp Psychol 55:379–383

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bobath B (1990) Adult hemiplegia. Evaluation and treatment, 3rd edn. Heinemann Medical, Oxford

  • Bourbonnais D, Vanden Noven S (1989) Weakness in patients with hemiparesis. Am J Occup Ther 43:313–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E (1996) Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382:252–255

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke D (1988) Spasticity as an adaptation to pyramidal tract injury. Adv Neurol 47:401–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz K-H (1995) Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 130:59–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr JH, Shepherd RB (1987) A motor learning model for rehabilitation. In: Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Gordon J, Gentile AM, Held JN (eds) Movement science: foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville, MD Aspen, pp 31–91

  • Cirstea MC, Levin MF (1998) Practice improves kinematics of reaching in hemiparetic subjects (abstract). Can J Rehab 11:189–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirstea MC, Levin MF (2000) Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 123:940–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cirstea MC, Mitnitski AB, Feldman AG, Levin MF (2003) Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke. Exp Brain Res (in press)

  • Cohen LG, Brasil NJ, Pascual LA, Hallett M (1993) Plasticity of cortical motor output organization following deafferentation, cerebral lesions and skill acquisition. Adv Neurol 63:641–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcos DM, Jaric S, Agarwal GC, Gottlieb GL (1993) Principles for learning single-joint movements. Exp Brain Res 94:499–513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR et al. (1997) A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 28:2518–2527

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman ERFW, Goodeve PJ (1983) Feedback control of hand movement and Fitts' Law. Q J Exp Psychol A 35:251–278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crovitz HF, Zener K (1962) A group test for assessing hand-and-eye dominance. Am J Psychol 75: 271–276.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dean CM, Shepherd RB (1997) Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. Stroke 28:722–728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M (2000) Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 31:2984–2988

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Levin MF (1995) The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control. Behav Brain Sci 18:723–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S (1975) The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehab Med 7:13–31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PB (1972) Proprioceptive illusions induced by muscle vibration: contribution by muscle spindles to perception? Science 175:1382–1384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M et al. (1993) Measuring physical impairment and disability with Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 24:58–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet C, Arsenault AB, Bourbonnais D, Laramée MT, Lepage Y (1996) Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on H-reflex and spinal spasticity. Scand J Rehabil Med 28:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnoli MA, Lanie AD, Tandy RD (1996) Optimal length for summary knowledge of results: the influence of task-related experience and complexity. Res Q Ex Sport 67:239–248

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagbarth KE, Eklund G (1966) Tonic vibration reflexes (TVR) in spasticity. Brain Res 2:201–203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett M (1999) Plasticity in the human motor system. Neuroscientist 5:324–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon RE (1996) Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:811–815

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess G, Donoghue JP (1994) Long-term potentiation of horizontal connections provides a mechanism to reorganize cortical motor maps. J Neurophysiol 71:2543–2547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Honda M, Nagamine T, Fukuyama H, Yonekura Y, Kimura J, Shibasaki H (1997) Movement-related cortical potentials and regional cerebral blood flow change in patients with stroke after motor recovery. J Neurol Sci 146:117–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hummelsheim H, Amberger S, Mauritz KH (1996) The influence of EMG-initiated electrical muscle stimulation on motor recovery of the centrally paretic hand. Eur J Neurol 3:245–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski TR, Bock C, Gentile AM (1995) The coordination between the trunk and arm motion during pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 106:457–466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karst GM, Hasan Z (1987) Antagonist muscle activity during human forearm movements under varying kinematic and loading conditions. Exp Brain Res 67:391–401

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller A, Iriki A, Asanuma H (1990) Identification of neurons producing LTP in the cat motor cortex: intracellular recordings and labeling. J Comp Neurol 300:47–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC (1992) Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73:220–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC (1999) Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 354:191–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK (2000) Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 14:361–369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WA (1989) A control systems framework for understanding normal and abnormal posture. Am J Occup Ther 43:291–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin MF (1996) Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain 119:281–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin MF, Hui-Chan CWY (1992) Relief of hemiparetic spasticity by TENS is associated with improvement in reflex and voluntary motor functions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 85:131–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin MF, Cirstea MC, Archambault P, Son F, Roby-Brami A (1996) Impairment and compensation of reaching in hemiparetic and cerebral palsied patients. In: Latash M, Rothwell J (eds) Bernstein's traditions in motor control ,vol II. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL, pp 103–122

  • Magill RA, Hall KG (1990) A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Hum Mov Sci 9:241–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen SM, Luta A, Roby-Brami A, Levin MF (2001) Effect of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 32:1875–1883

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore SP, Marteniuk RG (1986) Kinematic and EMG changes in learning. J Mot Behav 18:397–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau S, Arsenault AG, Gravel D, Lepage Y, Bourbonnais D (1998) Analysis of the spasticity index used in adults with a stroke. Can J Rehabil 11:219–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Natez J, Lammers T, Homberg V (1997) Reorganization of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. Brain 120:1579–1586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newell KM (1991) Motor skill acquisition. Ann Rev Psychol 42:213–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak KE, Miller LE, Houk JC (2000) Kinematic properties of rapid hand movements in a knob turning task. Exp Brain Res 132:419–433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen TS (1990) Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 21:247–251

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J (1990) Basic neurophysiogical structures of eye–hand coordination. In: Bard C, Fleury M, Hay L (eds) Development of eye–hand coordination across the life span. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp 26–74

  • Paillard J (1999) Body schema and body image. In: Gantchev GN, Mori S, Massion J (eds) Motor control today and tomorow. Professor Marin Drinov Academic, Sophia, Bulgaria, pp 197–214

  • Parker VM, Wade DT, Hewer RL (1986) Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency and recovery. Int J Rehab Med 8:69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Platz T, Denzler P, Kaden B, Mauritz K-H (1994) Motor learning after recovery from hemiparesis. Neuropsychologia 32:1209–1223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roby-Brami A, Fuchs S, Mokhtari M, Bussel B (1997) Reaching and grasping strategies in hemiparetic patients. Mot Control 1:72–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryerson S, Levit K (1987) The shoulder in hemiplegia. In: Donatelli R (editor) Physical therapy of the shoulder. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 105–131

  • Schmidt RA (1975) A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev 82:225–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA (1988) Motor and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Hewer KL, Wood VA (1983) Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46:5-8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Twitchell TE (1951) The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain 74:443–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rossum JHA (1990) Schmidt's schema theory: the empirical base of the variability of practice hypothesis. A critical analysis. Hum Mov Sci 9:387–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein OTR L, Diels C, Aisen M (2000) A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 54:1938–1944

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wade DT, Hewer RL, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM (1983) The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46:521–524

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks DL, Aubert MP, Feldman AG, Levin MF (1996) One-trial adaptation of movement to changes in load. J Neurophysiol 75:60–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiller C, Juptner M, Fellows S, Rijntjes M, Leonhardt G, Kiebel S, Muller S, Diener HC, Thilmann AF (1996) Brain representation of active and passive movements. Neuroimage 4:105–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiller C, Chollet F, Frackowiak RSJ (1997) Physiological aspects of functional recovery from stroke. In: Bogousslavsky J, Ginsberg M, Hennerici M (eds) Cerebrovascular disease. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 2057–2067

  • Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KHC, Macko RF (2000) Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 31:2390–2402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesendanger M (1991) Weakness and the upper motoneurone syndrome: a critical pathophysiological appraisal. In: Berardelli A, Benecke R (eds) Motor disturbances II. Academic, London, pp 319–331

  • Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA (1990) Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor learning. J Exp Psychol 16:677–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstein CJ, Merians AS, Sullivan KJ (1999) Motor learning after unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia 37:975–987

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woldag H, Hummelsheim H (2002) Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review. J Neurol 249:518–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the patients who volunteered for this study, as well as Dr. Sylvie Houde, Sheila Schneiberg and Ruth Dannenbaum. Thanks are extended to Anatol Feldman, Arnold Mitnitski and Michal Abrahamowicz for consultations during the study. This project was supported by the CIHR, Canadian Stroke Network and the Foundation of the Institut de Réadaptation de Montréal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neurological Science Research Centre, University of Montreal, Canada

    M. C. Cirstea & M. F. Levin

  2. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CRIR), Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal, 6300 Darlington, Montreal, Quebec, H3S 2J4, Canada

    M. C. Cirstea & M. F. Levin

  3. Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Canada

    A. Ptito

  4. School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, Canada

    M. F. Levin

Authors
  1. M. C. Cirstea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Ptito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. F. Levin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. F. Levin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cirstea, M.C., Ptito, A. & Levin, M.F. Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke. Exp Brain Res 152, 476–488 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1568-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1568-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation