Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of sterilization methods on ginger flavor beverage assessed by partial least squares regression of descriptive sensory analysis and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ginger flavor beverages (GFBs) were sterilized using different methods including ultra-high-temperature sterilization (UHT) (135 °C, 5 s), atmospheric pressure sterilization (AP) (95 °C, 30 min), and high-pressure sterilization (HP) (121 °C, 15 min). Comparative study of flavor among beverages from different sterilization methods was performed using quantitative descriptive sensory analysis and electronic nose (EN) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Seven attributes (fruity, floral, gingery, piquant, sweet, sour, and cooked) were selected to assess ginger beverage flavors. The odor profile features of GBFs from different sterilization methods were determined by EN, and fifty-nine volatile compounds were detected by GC–MS. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) was performed to analyze the correlation among data of quantitative descriptive sensory analysis, GC–MS data, and EN responses of GFBs. The results showed that nine volatile compounds, (E,E)-α-farnesene, eucalyptol, l-linalool, borneol, citronellol, β-bisabolol, geranial, bornyl acetate, and neryl acetate, had significant positive contribution to gingery note, and further, PLSR showed that AP was the most beneficial method to preserve these important volatile compounds. Conclusively, AP was chosen as the most favorable method for sterilization of clarified GFBs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GFBs:

Ginger flavor beverages

UHT:

Ultra-high-temperature sterilization

AP:

Atmospheric pressure sterilization

HP:

High-pressure sterilization

EN:

Electronic nose

GC–MS:

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

PLSR:

Partial least squares regression

References

  1. Bartley JP (2000) Effects of drying on flavour compounds in Australian-grown ginger (Zingiber officinale). J Sci Food Agric 80:209–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Salmon C, Bailey-Shaw Y, Hibbert S (2012) Characterisation of cultivars of Jamaican ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) by HPTLC and HPLC. Food Chem 131:1517–1522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali BH, Blunden G, Tanira MO (2008) Some phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): a review of recent research. Food Chem Toxicol 46:409–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang H, Xie Z, Koo HJ (2006) Metabolic profiling and phylogenetic analysis of medicinal Zingiber species: tools for authentication of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc). Phytochem. 67:1673–1685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma X, Gang DR (2006) Metabolic profiling of in vitro micropropagated and conventionally greenhouse grown ginger (Zingibei officinale). Phytochem 67:2239–2255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Policegoudra RS, Aradhya SM (2007) Biochemical changes and antioxidant activity of mango ginger (Curcuma amada Roxb) rhizomes during postharvest storage at different temperatures. Postharvest Biol Technol 46:189–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ding SH, An KJ, Wang ZF (2011) Effect of drying methods on volatiles of Chinese ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Food Bioprod Process 10:273–283

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jolad SD, Lantz RC, Solyom AM (2004) Fresh organically grown ginger (Zingiber officinale): composition and effects on LPS-induced PGE (2) production. Phytochem 65:1937–1954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nishimura O (1995) Identification of the characteristic odorants in fresh rhizomes of ginger (Zingiber officinale) using aroma extract dilution analysis and modified multidimensional gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy. Food Chem 43:2941–2945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu Y, Huang T, Yang B, Duan G (2006) Development of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with microwave distillation and simultaneous solid-phase microextraction for rapid determination of volatile constituents in ginger. J Pharm Biomed Anal 43:24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soria AC, Sanz J, Martinez-Castro I (2009) SPME followed by GC–MS: a powerful technique for qualitative analysis of honey volatiles. Eur Food Res Technol 228:579–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bleibaum R, Stone H, Tan T (2002) Comparison of sensory and consumer results with electronic nose and tongue sensors for apple juices. Food Qual Prefer 13:409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gardner JW, Boilot P, Hines EL (2005) Enhancing electronic nose performance by sensor selection using a new integer-based genetic algorithm approach. Sens Actuators B Chem 106:114–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Banerjee Roy R, Tudu B, Shaw L (2012) Instrumental testing of tea by combining the responses of electronic nose and tongue. J Food Eng 110:356–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cole M, Covington JA, Gardner JF (2011) Combined electronic nose and tongue for a flavour sensing system. Sens Actuators B Chem 156:832–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Balaban MO, Korel F, Odabasi AZ (2000) Transportability of data between electronic noses: mathematical methods. Sens Actuators B Chem 71:203–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang B, Xu S, Sun D (2010) Application of the electronic nose to the identification of different milk flavourings. Food Res Int 43:255–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Song S, Zhang X, Hayat K (2010) Correlating chemical parameters of controlled oxidation tallow to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry profiles and e-nose responses using partial least squares regression analysis. Sens Actuators B Chem 147:660–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsujimoto H, Huang CC, Kinoshita N (2004) Ultra-high pressure sterilization of powdery food stuff-a new application of a roller compactor. Powder Technol 146:214–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sing RRB, Ruhil AP, Jain DK, Patel AA (2009) Prediction of sensory quality of UHT milk—a comparison of kinetic and neural network approaches. J Food Eng 92:146–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rao L, Hayat K, Lv Y, Zhang X (2011) Effect of ultrafiltration and fining adsorbents on the clarification of green tea. J Food Eng 102:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ISO-8586-1 (International standard 8586-1) (1993) Sensory analysis-methodology-general guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors [Ref. no. ISO 8586-1:1993(E)]. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland

  23. ISO (2007) Sensory analysis-general guidance for the design of test room. Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martens H, Martens M (2001) Multivariate analysis of quality: an introduction. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zaidi F, Rouissi H, Dridi S, Kammoun M (2008) Front-face fluorescence spectroscopy as a rapid and non-destructive tool for differentiating between Sicilo-Sarde and Comisana Ewe’s milk during lactating period: a preliminary study. Food Bioprocess Technol 1:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Song G (2003) Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry coupled with solid-phase microextraction for determination of volatile constituents of Chinese ginger. J Fudan Univ (Nat Sci) 42:939–944

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen C-C, Ho C-T (1988) Gas chromatographic analysis of volatile components of ginger oil (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) extracted with liquid carbon dioxide. J Agric Food Chem 36:322–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vendramini A (2000) Chemical composition of acerola fruit (Malpighia punicifolia L.) at three stages of maturity. Food Chem 71:195–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Variyar PS (1995) Effect of gamma-irradiation on the volatile oil constituents of fresh ginger (zingiber officinale) rhizome. Food Res Int 30:41–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Niu Y, Zhang X, Xiao Z, Song S (2011) Characterization of odor-active compounds of various cherry wines by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, gas chromatography-olfactometry and their correlation with sensory attributes. J Chromatogr B 879:2287–2293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Martens H (2000) Modified Jack-knife estimation of parameter uncertainty in bilinear modelling by partial least squares regression (PLSR). Food Qual Prefer 11:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program of China 2012BAD33B05 for its financial support.

Conflict of interest

None.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoming Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, F., Song, S., Zhang, X. et al. Effect of sterilization methods on ginger flavor beverage assessed by partial least squares regression of descriptive sensory analysis and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Eur Food Res Technol 238, 247–257 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-013-2093-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-013-2093-8

Keywords

Navigation