Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of cocoa butter and chocolates obtained from cocoa varieties grown in Bahia, Brazil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the attack of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) plants by the fungus Moniliophthora perniciosa which caused witches’ broom disease in the state of Bahia, Brazil, resistant clonal material with elevated productivity and superior physical characteristics has been selected for use in the genetic improvement program and by the cocoa producers themselves. The present study aimed to characterize the cocoa butter and chocolates produced from nine cacao varieties and also from the Amelonado cacao produced in the same region (denominated as Common), with a view to quality improvement. The cocoa butter was characterized for its solid fat content and triacylglycerol composition, and the chocolates for their moisture and protein contents, maximum particle diameter, pH value, acidity, rheological properties and instrumental texture, as well as a sensory test for acceptability with 50 consumers. A relationship was found between the triacylglycerol composition and solid fat curves of the cocoa butters and the instrumental texture of the chocolates, the highest values for the latter parameter being observed for the varieties with greater amounts of symmetrical triacylglycerols and greater solid fat contents at the temperatures evaluated. From a sensory point of view, it was shown that overall acceptance and buying intention were mainly determined by the attributes of “astringency,” “bitterness,” “acidity” and “chocolate flavor.” It was also shown that chocolates produced from varieties descendent from the Trinitario group were differentiated from those descendent from the Forastero group, showing the preference of consumers for these materials and the possibility of a gain in quality in the genetic improvement of cacao by including varieties descended from the Trinitario and Criollo groups in the crossing programs, associating disease resistance with product quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AOCS (2009) Official methods and recommended practices of the American Oil Chemists′ Society. American Oil Society, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berbert PRF (1976) Influência das condições climáticas na composição química e características físicas da manteiga do cacau. Revista Theobroma 6(3):61–76

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berbert PRF, Alvim PT (1972) Fatores que afetam o índice de iodo da manteiga de cacau do Brasil. Rev Theobroma 2(1):3–16

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brito ES, Narain N (2003) Effect of pH and distillate volume on monitoring aroma quality of bittersweet chocolate. Food Qual Prefer 14:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryselbout P, Fabry Y (1995) Guide technologique de la confiserie industrielle. Tome 1. Sepaic, Paris 250 p

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chevalley J (1994) Chocolate flow properties. In: Beckett ST (ed) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use, 2nd edn. Black Academic & Professional, London, pp 139–155

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Clapperton JF, Keung STY, Kee DLH, Lockwood R (1993) Genetic variation of cocoa flavour. In: Proceedings of 11th international cocoa research conference, Yamoussoukro, Côte D’Ivoire, pp 749–754

  8. Clapperton JF, Yow STK, Chan J, Lim DHK, Lockwood G, Romanczyk LJ, Hammerstone JF (1994) The contribution of genotype to cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) flavour. Trop Agric (Trinidad) 71:303–308

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dimick PS, Hoskin JM (1981) Chemico-physical aspects of chocolate processing—a review. J Can Inst Food Sci Technol 14(4):269–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. End M et al (1994) International cocoa Germplasm database. University of Reading, UK, 366p. Available on http://www.icgd.rdg.ac.uk/search.php

  11. Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations—FAO (2011). http://faostat.fao.org/site. Accessed 15 Sept

  12. Fowler MS (2009) Cocoa beans: from tree to factory. In: Beckett ST (ed) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use, 4edn. Blackwell Publishing, UK, pp 10–47

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horwitz W, Latimer G (ed) (2006) Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 18th edn, Gaithersburg, MD

  14. Hoskin JM, Dimick PS (1979) Volatile fatty acid changes during the conching of chocolate. In: Proceedings of the 33rd PMCA production conference, pp 23–32

  15. International Office of Cocoa, Chocolate and Sugar Confectioner (IOCCSC) (1973) Viscosité du chocolat: determinacion de la limite d’e coulement et de viscosité plastique de casson. Rev Int Choc (RIC) 28:216–218

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jorge MC, Rodriguez I, Hombre R (1999) Evaluation of an instrumental method of texture analysis for quality control of chocolate bars. Alimentaria 36(305):73–76

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khan N, Motilal LA, Sukha DA, Bekele FL, Iwaro AD, Bidaisee G, Umaharan P, Grierson LH, Zhang D (2008) Variability of butterfat content in cacao (Theobroma cacao L.): combination and correlation with other seed-derived traits at the International Cocoa Genebank, Trinidad. Plant Genet Resour 6(3):175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lehrian DW, Keeney PG, Butler DR (1980) Trygliceride characteristics of cocoa butter from cacao fruit matured in a microclimate of elevated temperature. J Am Oil Chem Soc 57(2):66–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luccas V (2001) Fracionamento térmico e obtenção de gorduras de cupuaçu alternativas a manteiga de cacau para uso na fabricação de chocolate. 188p. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Química)—Faculdade de Engenharia Química, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas

  20. Luna F, Crouzillat D, Cirou L, Bucheli P (2002) Chemical composition and flavor of Ecuadorian cocoa liquor. J Agric Food Chem 50(12):3527–3532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT (1988) Sensory evaluation techniques. CRC Press, Inc., Florida, p 281

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moskowitz HR (1983) Product testing and sensory evaluation of foods—marketing and R&D approach. Food & Nutrition Press Inc., Connecticut, p 605

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ohlrogge JB, Browse J, Somerville CR (1991) The genetics of plant lipids. Bioch et Biophys Acta 1082(1):1–26

  24. Pires JL (2003) Avaliação quantitativa e molecular de germoplasma para o melhoramento de cacaueiro com ênfase na produtividade, qualidade dos frutos e resistência à doenças. 226p. Tese (Doutorado em Genética e Melhoramento)—Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa

  25. Pires JL, Cascardo JCM, Lambert SV, Figueira AV (1998) Increasing cocoa butter yield through genetic improvement of Theobroma cacao L.: seed fat content variability, inheritance and association with seed yield. Euphytica 103:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. SAS Institute Inc. (2011) SAS/STAT 9.3—User’s Guide. http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/allprodsproc/63883/HTML/default/viewer.htm#procedures.htm. Accessed 18 Jan

  27. Schantz B, Rohm H (2005) Influence of lecithin-PGPR blends on the rheological properties of chocolate. Lebenson Wiss Technol 38:41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Slabas AR, Fawcett T (1992) The biochemistry and molecular biology of plant lipid biosynthesis. Plant Mol Biol 19(1):169–191

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sukha DA, Butler DR, Umaharan PE, Boult E (2008) The use of an optimised organoleptic assessment protocol to describe and quantify different flavour attributes of cocoa liquors made from Ghana and Trinitario beans. Eur J Food Technol 226(3):405–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Talbot G (1994) Chocolate temper. In: Beckett ST (ed) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use 2edn, 2nd edn. Black Academic & Professional, London, pp 156–166

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Tucci MLS, Figueira A, Bovi MLA, Turatti JM, Gutierrez LE, Saes LA (2002) Avaliação de Genótipos para Produção de Manteiga de Cacau no Vale do Ribeira, SP, Brasil. Braz J Food Technol 5(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vissotto FZ, Luccas V, Bragagnolo N, Turatti JM, Grimaldi R, Figueiredo MS (1999) Caracterização físico-química de chocolates comerciais elaborados com gorduras alternativas. Braz J Food Technol 21(2):139–148

    Google Scholar 

  33. Voltz M, Beckett ST (1997) Sensory of chocolate. Manuf Confect 77(2):49–53

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ziegler GR, Hogg R (2009) Particle size reduction. In: Beckett ST (ed) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, UK, pp 142–168

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ziegleder G (2009) Flavour development in cocoa and chocolate. In: Beckett ST (ed) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, UK, pp 169–188

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES—Brazil) for the fellowship awarded to the first author and CEPLAC (Comissão Executiva para o Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira) for the vegetal material.

Conflict of interest

None.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

Considering the sensory analysis performed in the article, we declare that all procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. All of the consumers recruited for the sensory analysis were informed and signed a term of consent for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priscilla Efraim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Efraim, P., Pires, J.L., Garcia, A.O. et al. Characteristics of cocoa butter and chocolates obtained from cocoa varieties grown in Bahia, Brazil. Eur Food Res Technol 237, 419–428 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-013-2006-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-013-2006-x

Keywords

Navigation