Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of phenolic compounds and antioxidant and antiproliferative activities in frequently consumed raw vegetables

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the antioxidant value and antiproliferative activity of some vegetables such as raw garlic (Allium sativum L), white and yellow, and red onions (Allium cepa L), red and green peppers (Capsicum annuum L.), and white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba), which were harvested in the same year and in the same geographical and climatic conditions. It was found that the highest content of some bioactive compounds (25.19 ± 2.2 mg GAE/g, 3.84 ± 0.3 mg CE/g, 4.88 ± 0.3 mg CE/g, 59.20 ± 0.8 μg CE/g, 1992 ± 99.8 μg AA/g, 452.7 ± 26.1 mg CGE/kg DW for polyphenols, flavonoids, tannins, flavanols, ascorbic acid, and anthocyanins, respectively) and the antioxidant activity (41.32 ± 3.9, 31.05 ± 2.7, 59.17 ± 5.2 and 58.94 ± 5.1 μM TE/g for DPPH, FRAP, CUPRAC and ABTS, respectively) was in red onion. Methanol extracts in concentration of 1,000 μg ml−1 of garlic and red onion exhibited antiproliferative activity (83.1 ± 2.1 and 85.0 ± 3.2% of viability, respectively). In spite of relatively high antioxidant activity in methanol extracts of yellow onion, red and green pepper, no antiproliferative activity on both tumor cell lines was registered. In conclusion, among the studied vegetables raw red onion was the preferable. The interrelationship was in the following order: red onion > white onion = yellow onion > red pepper > garlic = green pepper > white cabbage. The antiproliferative activities of these vegetables were different: some samples reacted only on Calu-6 and the others—on SNU-601. Thus, vegetables from the same cultivation place were examined for their antioxidant and antiproliferative activities with four different methods. Based on obtained data a direct comparison between these vegetables was possible for the first time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang J, Meyers KJ, Van Der Heide J, Liu RH (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:6787–6793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marin A, Ferreres F, Tomas-Barberan FA, Gil M (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:3861–3869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen YM, Wang MK, Huang PM (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54:212–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozyurek M, Guclu K, Bektasoglu B, Apak R (2007) Anal Chim Acta 588:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sinelli N, Spinardi A, Di Egidioa V, Mignani I, Casiraghia E (2008) Postharvest Biolog Technol 50:31–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanakis CD, Tarantilis PA, Polissiou MG, Diamantoglou S, Tajmir-Riahi HA (2006) J Mol Struct 798:69–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chun OK, Kim DO, Smith N, Schroeder D, Han JT, Lee CY (2005) J Sci Food Agric 85:1715–1724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koebnick C, Garcia AL, Dagnelie PC, Strassner C, Lindemans J, Katz N, Leitzmann C, Hoffmann I (2005) J Nutr 135:2372–2378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lairon D, Arnault N, Bertrais S, Planells R, Clero E, Hercberg S, MCh Boutron-Ruault (2005) Am J Clin Nutr 82:1185–1194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haruenkit R, Poovarodom S, Leontowicz H, Leontowicz M, Sajewicz M, Kowalska T, Delgado-Licon E, Rocha-Guzman NE, Gallegos-Infante JA, Trakhtenberg S, Gorinstein S (2007) J Agric Food Chem 55:5842–5849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saxena R, Venkaiah K, Anitha P, Venu L, Raghunath M (2007) Int J Food Sci Nutr 58:250–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Proteggente AR, Pannala AS, Paganga G, Van Buren L, Wagner E, Wiseman S, Van De Put F, Dacombe C, Rice-Evans CA (2002) Free Rad Res 36:217–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun J, Chu YF, Wu XZ, Liu RH (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:7449–7454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang H, Cao G, Prior RL (1996) J Agric Food Chem 44:701–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Banerjee SK, Maulik M, Mancahanda SC, Dinda AK, Gupta SK, Maulik SK (2002) Life Sci 70:1509–1518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dai J, Patel JD, Mumper RJ (2007) J Med Food 10:258–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Heo BG, Park YS, Chon AU, Lee SY, Cho JY, Gorinstein S (2007) BioFactors 30:79–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim H, Bang C, Choi Y, Lee J (2007) Food Sci Biotechnol 16:802–806

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ammar RB, Kilani S, Bouhlel I, Ezzi L, Skandrani I, Boubaker J, Sghaier MB, Naffeti A, Mahmoud A, Chekir-Ghedira L, Ghedira K (2008) Drug Chem Toxicol 31:61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roy MK, Takenaka M, Isobe S, Tsushida T (2007) Food Chem 103:106–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vinson JA, Liang XQ, Proch J, Hontz BA, Dancel J, Sandone N (2002) Adv Exp Med Biol 505:113–122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gorinstein S, Drzewiecki J, Leontowicz H, Leontowicz M, Najman K, Jastrzebski Z, Zachwieja Z, Barton H, Shtabsky B, Katrich E, Trakhtenberg S (2005) J Agric Food Chem 53:2726–2732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kusznierewicz B, Bartoszek A, Wolska L, Drzewiecki J, Gorinstein S, Namieśnik J (2008) LWT 41:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng GW, Breen PJ (1991) J Am Soc Horticult Sci 116:865–869

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Szeto YT, Tomlinson B, Benzie IFF (2002) Br J Nutr 87:55–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozgen M, Reese RN, Tulio AZ Jr, Scheerens JC, Miller AR (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54:1151–1157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Apak R, Guclu K, Ozyurek M, Karademir SE (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:7970–7981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chon S-Uk, Heo B-G, Park Y-S, Cho J-Y, Gorinstein S (2008) J Sci Food Agric JSFA-07-0718

  29. Kim MJ, Kim YJ, Park HJ, Chung JH, Leem KH, Kim HK (2006) Food Chem Toxicol 44:898–902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ninfali P, Mea G, Giorgini S, Rocchi M, Bacchiocca M (2005) Br J Nutr 93:257–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ou B, Huang D, Hampsch-Woodill M, Flanagan JA, Deemer EK (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:3122–3128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stratil P, Klejdus B, Kuban V (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54:607–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun T, Tanumihardjo SA (2007) J Food Sci 72:R159–R165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mertens-Talcott S, Percival S (2005) Cancer Lett 218:141–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang W, Zhao Y, Rayburn ER, Hill DL, Wang H, Zhang R (2007) Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 59:589–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Campbell JK, King JL, Harmston M, Lila MA, Erdman JW Jr (2006) J Food Sci 71:S358–S363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Galeone C, Pelucchi C, Levi F, Negri E, Franceschi S, Talamini R, Giacosa A, La Vecchia C (2006) Am J Clin Nutr 84:1027–1032

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are thankful to Dr. Elena Katrich (Hebrew University of Jerusalem, School of Pharmacy) for her technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shela Gorinstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorinstein, S., Park, YS., Heo, BG. et al. A comparative study of phenolic compounds and antioxidant and antiproliferative activities in frequently consumed raw vegetables. Eur Food Res Technol 228, 903–911 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-1003-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-1003-y

Keywords

Navigation