Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between rheological, textural and melting properties of dark chocolate as influenced by particle size distribution and composition

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In dark chocolate, rheological properties during processing are influenced by particle size distribution (PSD), fat and lecithin contents with consequential effects on finished texture and melting characteristics. Multivariate regression, correlation and principal component analyses (PCA) were used to explore their interrelationships. A 4 × 3 × 2 factorial experiment was conducted with varying PSD [D 90 (90% finer than this size) of 18, 25, 35 and 50 μm], fat (25, 30 and 35%) and lecithin (0.3 and 0.5%). Rheological properties (yield stress and apparent viscosity), textural properties (firmness, index of viscosity and hardness) and melting index (duration) were respectively measured using shear rate-controlled rheometer, TA.HD Plus texture analyzer and differential scanning calorimetry. The PSD, fat and lecithin contents significantly influenced all rheological, textural properties and some melting characteristics. Increasing particles sizes reduced yield stress, apparent viscosity, firmness, index of viscosity, hardness and melting index of products with greatest influence with 25% fat and 0.3% lecithin, reduced with increasing fat and lecithin contents. There were high correlation (r = 0.78–0.99) and regression coefficients (R 2 = 0.59–0.99) among the rheological, textural and melting index indicating their high inter-relationships. In PCA, the rheological, textural and melting index accounted for >95% variance in the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Afoakwa EO, Paterson A, Fowler M (2007) Trends Food Sci Technol 18:290–298. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2007.02.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Servais C, Ranc H, Roberts ID (2004) J Texture Stud 34:467–497. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4603.2003.tb01077.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chevalley J (1999) In: Beckett ST (ed) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 182–199

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Confectionery Association (ICA) (2000) Viscosity of cocoa and chocolate products. Analytical method 46. Available from CAOBISCO, rue Defacqz 1, B-1000 Bruxelles, Belgium

  5. Doraiswamy D, Mujumdar AM, Tsao I, Beris A, Metzner AB (1991) J Rheol 35:647–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoo B, Rao MA (1995) J Texture Stud 26:1–10. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4603.1995.tb00780.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prasad V, Trappe V, Dinsmore AD, Segre PN, Cipelletti L, Weitz DA (2003) Rideal Lect Faraday Discuss 123:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baker BS, Brown BD, Anantheswaran RC (2006) J Texture Stud 37:655–667. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4603.2006.00076.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seguine ES (1988) Manuf Confect 11:57–63

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beckett ST (2000) The science of chocolate. Royal Society of Chemistry Paperbacks, pp 12–52

  11. Afoakwa EO, Paterson A, Fowler M (2007) Eur Food Res Technol (Published online). doi:10.1007/s00217-007-0652-610.1007/s00217-007-0652-6

  12. Bourne M (2002) Food texture and viscosity: concepts and measurements. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 102–134

    Google Scholar 

  13. Varela P, Salvador A, Fiszman S (2007) J Food Eng 78:622–629. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.10.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heath RM, Prinz JF (1999) In: Rosenthal AJ (ed) Food texture: measurement and perception. Aspen, Gaithersburg, pp 18–29

  15. Kilcast D (1999) In: Rosenthal AJ (ed) Food texture measurement and perception. Chapman & Hall, Aspen, USA, pp 30–64

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilkinson C, Dijksterhuis GB, Minekus M (2000) Trends Food Sci Technol 11:442–450. doi:10.1016/S0924-2244(01)00033-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lillford PJ (1991) In: Vincent JFV, Lillford PJ (eds) Feeding and the texture of foods. University Press, Cambridge, pp 231–243

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lawless HT, Heymann H (1998) Sensory evaluation of food; principles and practices. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 24–35

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohamed AAA, Jowitt R, Brennan JG (1982) J Food Eng 1:55–75. doi:10.1016/0260-8774(82)90013-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meullenet J-F, Carpenter JA, Lyon BG, Lyon CE (1997) J Texture Stud 28:101–118. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4603.1997.tb00104.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenthal AJ (1999) In: Rosenthal AJ (ed) Food texture, measurement and perception. Chapman & Hall, Aspen, USA, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ali A, Selamat J, CheMan YB, Suria AM (2001) Food Chem 72:491–497. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00271-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pereira RB, Singh H, Munro PA, Luckman MS (2003) Int Dairy J 13:655–667. doi:10.1016/S0958-6946(03)00071-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Braipson-Danthine S, Deroanne C (2004) Food Res Intern 37:941–948. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2004.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Christiansen KF, Krekling T, Kohler A, Vegarud G, Langsrud T, Egelandsdal B (2006) Food Hydrocolloids 20:650–662. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2005.06.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Baixauli R, Sanz T, Salvador A, Fiszman SM (2007) Food Hydrocolloids 21:230–236. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.03.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tabouret T (1987) Int J Food Sci Technol 22:163–167. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb00472.x

    Google Scholar 

  28. Walter P, Cornillon P (2001) J Am Oil Chem Soc 78:927–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Walter P, Cornillon P (2002) Food Res Intern 35:761–767. doi:10.1016/S0963-9969(02)00072-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. ICA (1998) Determination of moisture content of cocoa and chocolate products. Analytical Method 26. Available from CAOBISCO, rue Defacqz 1, B-1000 Bruxelles, Belgium

  31. ICA (1990) Determination of fat content of cocoa and chocolate products. Analytical Method 37. Available from CAOBISCO, rue Defacqz 1, B-1000 Bruxelles, Belgium

  32. Vasanthan T, Bhatty RS (1996) Cereal Chem 73:199–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ziegler G, Hogg R (1999) In: Beckett ST (ed) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 182–199

    Google Scholar 

  34. Full NA, Yella Reddy S, Dimick PS, Ziegler GR (1996) J Food Sci 61:1066–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liang B, Hartel W (2004) J Dairy Sci 87:30–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mongia G, Ziegler GR (2000) Int J Food Prop 3:137–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Beckett ST (1999) Industrial chocolate manufacture and use, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 153–181, 201–230, 405–428, 460–465

  38. Keogh K, Twomey M, O’Kennedy B, Mulvihill D (2002) Lait 82:531–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ziegler GR, Mongia G, Hollender R (2001) Int J Food Prop 4:353–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was co-funded by the Government of Ghana and Nestlé Product Technology Centre (York, UK). The sponsors are gratefully acknowledged for the Research Support. The authors thank Steve Beckett, Angela Ryan and Angel Manez (Nestlé PTC, York) for expert technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Ohene Afoakwa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Afoakwa, E.O., Paterson, A., Fowler, M. et al. Relationship between rheological, textural and melting properties of dark chocolate as influenced by particle size distribution and composition. Eur Food Res Technol 227, 1215–1223 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-0839-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-0839-5

Keywords

Navigation