Skip to main content
Log in

Physical degradation of genomic DNA of soybean flours does not impair relative quantification of its transgenic content

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, four different physical treatments (microwaves, heating by conduction, sonication and pressure autoclaving) were performed to degrade a pure DNA extract, and their influence on GMO quantification was studied. The aim was to check the hypothesis that processing of agrofood products results in a similar degradation rate for both the transgenic target and the specific target. Indeed we could observe that even if the used physical treatments could lead to a significant increase of C t values for both transgenic and specific targets, the resulting ΔC t remained stable. So, the main conclusion of the study is that the aforementioned hypothesis seems valid and thus a physical degradation of DNA will not affect the relative quantitation of the GMO content, provided that both the specific and transgenic targets have very similar size. A second important issue of the experiments performed was that DNA is a very robust molecule as it is extremely difficult to reach a mean size below 100 bp. The study also gives evidence of the importance of using small targets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Off. J. EU L268:1–23

  2. Stave JW (1999) Food Control 10:367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wurz A, Bluth A, Zeltz P, Pfeifer C, Willmund R (1999) Food Control 10:385–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van den Eede G, Lipp M, Eyquem F, Anklam E (2000) Report EUR 19676 EN

  5. Higuchi R, Dollinger G, Walsh PS, Griffith R (1992) Bio/Technol 10:413–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holland PM, Abramson RD, Watson R, Gelfand DH (1991) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:7276–7280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Corbisier P, Trapmann S, Gancberg D, Hannes L, Van Iwaarden P, Berben G, Schimmel H, Emons H (2005) Anal Bioanal Chem 383(2):282–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moreano F, Busch U, Engel K-H (2005) J Agric Food Chem 53:9971–9979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bauer T, Weller P, Hammes WP, Hertel C (2003) Eur Food Res Technol 217:338–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. AFNOR (2005) ISO 21570. Foodstuffs – Methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products – Quantitative nucleic acid based methods. Association Française de Normalisation, Paris, France

  11. Wurz A, Rüggeberg H, Brodmann P, Waiblinger H-U, Pietsch K (1998) Deutsche Lebensm Rundschau 94:159–161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaïtilingom M, Pijnenburg H, Gendre F, Brignon P (1999) J Agric Food Chem 47:5261–5266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taverniers I, Windels P, Van Bockstaele E, De Loose M (2001) Eur Food Res Technol 213:417–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pietsch K, Waiblinger H-U (2000) Quantification of genetically modified soybeans in food with the Lightcycler system. In: Meuer S, Wittwer C, Nakagawara K (eds) Rapid Cycle Real-Time PCR. Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pardigol A, Guillet S, Popping B (2003) Eur Food Res Technol 216:412–420

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiseman G (2002) J AOAC Int 85:792–796

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Holst-Jensen A, Berdal K (2004) J AOAC Int 87:927–931

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was done within a Belgian research project (S-5952) financed by DG4 and DG6 of the former Belgian Federal Ministry of Agriculture. We thank V. Planchon and R. Oger of CRA-W (Biometry Unit) for their statistical help. We are grateful to Prof. D. Portetelle of the Faculté Universitaire des Sciences Agronomiques de Gembloux for giving us access to their sonication facility and to Mrs Dudfield for checking the English text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilbert Berben.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debode, F., Janssen, E. & Berben, G. Physical degradation of genomic DNA of soybean flours does not impair relative quantification of its transgenic content. Eur Food Res Technol 226, 273–280 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0536-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0536-1

Keywords

Navigation