Skip to main content
Log in

Combination and comparison of multivariate analysis for the identification of orange varieties using visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study of multivariate analysis for orange varieties was carried out, and the potential of visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (Vis/NIRS) for its ability to nondestructively differentiate orange varieties was evaluated. A total of 320 orange samples (80 for each variety) were investigated for Vis/NIRS on 325–1075 nm using a field spectroradiometer. Multivariate classification methods including principal component analysis (PCA), back propagation neural network (BPNN) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) were adopted to classify oranges. Sixteen principal components from PCA were used as the input of BPNN model, and the identification accuracy of four orange varieties reached 100%. The prediction result of PLSDA, i.e., standard error of prediction (SEP) 0.24497, correlation coefficient (R) 0.97843, root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) 0.24268, and identification accuracy 90% indicate that PLSDA is an alternative model for orange identification. With the comparison of these two models, it shows that BPNN combined with PCA obtained better classification effect than that of PLSDA. The overall results demonstrate that Vis/NIRS technology with multivariate analysis models is promising for the rapid and reliable determination for identification of orange varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moons E, Dubois A, Dardenne P, Sindic M (1997) In: Proceedings of the international conference on sensors for non destructive testing; nondestructive visible and NIR spectroscopy for the determination of internal quality in apple. Olando, Floida, Ithaca

  2. Murray I, Aucott L, Pike IH (2001) J Near Infrared Spectrosc 9:297–311

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nilsen H, Esaiassen M (2005) Lebensm-Wiss u-Technol 38:95–99

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ventura M, Jager AD, Putter HD, Roelofs F (1998) Postharvest Biol Technol 14:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schnilovitch Z, Mizrach A, Hoffman A, Egozi H, Fuchs Y (2000) Postharvest Biol Technol 19:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bechar A, Mizrach A, Barreiro P, Landahl S (2005) Biosyst Eng 91:329–334

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cozzolino D, Murray I (2004) Lebensm-Wiss u-Technol 37:447–452

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cuadrado MU, Luque de Castro MD, Perez Juan PM, Gomez-Nieto MA (2005) Talanta 66:218–224

    Google Scholar 

  9. He Y, Li XL, Shao YN (2006) Spectrosc Spectral Anal 26:850–853

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seregely Z, Deak T, Bisztray GD (2004) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 72:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tang YF, Zhang ZY, Fan GQ (2005) Spectrosc Spectrum Anal 25:521–524

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pedro AMK, Ferreira MMC (2005) Anal Chem 77:2505–2511

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bian ZQ, Zhang XG (2000) Pattern recognition. Qinghua University Press, Beijing

  14. Zhen WZ, Yuan HF, Xu GF, Qiang DM (2000) Modern near infrared spectroscopy analysis technology. Chinese Shihua Press, Beijing

  15. Nigel Y (2001) Int J Food Propert 4:247–260

    Google Scholar 

  16. Downey G, Sheehan E, Delahunty C, Callaghan DO, Guinee T, Howard V (2005) Int Dairy J 15:701–709

    Google Scholar 

  17. Widyanto MR, Novuhara H, Kawamoto K, Hirota K, Kusumoputro B (2005) Appl Soft Comput 6:72–84

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tang QY, Feng MG (2002) DPS data processing system for practical statistics. Science Publishing Company Press, Beijing

  19. Antihus HG, He Y, Annia GP (2006) J Food Eng 77:313–319

    Google Scholar 

  20. Naes T, Isaksson T, Fearn T, Davies AM (2002) A user-friendly guide to multivariate calibration and classification. NIR Publications, UK

  21. Zhao C, Qu HB, Cheng YU (2004) Spectrosc Spectrum Anal 24:50–53

    Google Scholar 

  22. Martens H, Naes T (1989) Multivariate calibration. Wiley, New York

  23. Blanco M, Coello J, Iturriaga H, Maspoch S, Pagès J (2000) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 50:75–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Teaching and Research Award Program for Outstanding Young Teachers in Higher Education Institutions of MOE, P. R. C., Natural Science Foundation of China, Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Project No. 20040335034) and Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang (Project No. RC02067).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cen, H., He, Y. & Huang, M. Combination and comparison of multivariate analysis for the identification of orange varieties using visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Eur Food Res Technol 225, 699–705 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0470-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0470-2

Keywords

Navigation