Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of modified atmosphere packaging and vacuum packaging on the shelf-life of refrigerated chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus): biochemical and sensory attributes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP 1: 70% CO2/30% N2 and MAP 2: 50% CO2/30% N2/20% O2) and vacuum packaging (VP), on the shelf-life of chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus) fillets stored under refrigeration was studied. Quality assessment was based on sensory analysis and biochemical indices determination. Increase in total volatile basic nitrogen (TVBN) and trimethylamine nitrogen (TMAN) followed the order: MAP 1 < MAP 2 < VP < air (control samples). The presence of oxygen into the fish package (air or MAP) resulted in an increase in the 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) values in comparison with samples packaged in the absence of oxygen. The most effective MAP used was MAP 1 which contributed to a considerably slower rate of fish spoilage. Based primarily on odour scores it was observed that raw chub mackerel fillets stored in the presence of air remained acceptable up to ca. 11 days, VP and MAP 2 samples up to ca. 15–16 days, while MAP 1 samples up to ca. 20–21 days of storage. On the other hand, flesh texture and flesh colour of all packaged samples received scores above or equal than the acceptability limit up to ca. 13–14 days of storage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anonymous (2000) Annual Report, Greek Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Fishing, Athens

  2. Brody AL (1989) Modified atmosphere packaging of seafoods. In: Brody AL (ed) Controlled/modified atmosphere/vacuum packaging of foods. Food and Nutrition Press, Inc., Connecticut, USA, pp 59–65

  3. Davies AR (1997) Modified-atmosphere packaging of fish and fish products. In: Hall GM (ed) Fish processing technology. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, pp 200–223

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brody AL, Marsh KS (1997) Modified atmosphere packaging. In: Brody AL, Marsh KS (eds) The wiley encyclopedia of packaging technology. Wiley, New York, pp 656–659

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sivertsvik M, Jeksrud WK, Rosnes JT (2002) Int J Food Sci Technol 37:107–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gram L, Huss HH (1996) Int J Food Microbiol 33:121–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dalgaard P, Gram L, Huss HH (1993) Int J Food Microbiol 9:283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhananjaya S, Stroud GD (1994) Int J Food Sci Technol 29:575–583

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ordonez JA, Lopez-Galvez DE, Fernandez M, Hierro E, de la Hoz L (2000) J Sci Food Agric 80:1831–1840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozogul F, Polat A, Ozogul Y (2004) Food Chem 85:49–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goulas AE, Chouliara I, Nessi E, Kontominas MG, Savvaidis IN (2005) J Appl Microbiol 98:752–760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goulas AE, Kontominas MG (2006) Food Chem, in press

  13. Sivertsvik M, Rosnes JT, Jeksrud WK (2004) J Food Eng 63:451–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Masniyom P, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W (2005) Eur Food Res Technol 220:322–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reddy NR, Roman MG, Villanueva RM, Solomon HM, Kautter DA, Rhodehamel EJ (1997) J Food Sci 62(4):878–884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozogul F, Taylor KDA, Quantick TP, Ozogul Y (2000) Food Chem 71:267–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruiz-Capillas C, Moral A (2001) Eur Food Res Technol 212:413–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruiz-Capillas C, Moral A (2005) Food Chem 89(3):347–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boknaes N, Jensen KN, Andersen CM, Martens H (2002) Lebensm-Wiss u-Technol 35:628–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Masniyom P, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W (2002) J Sci Food Agric 82:873–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Corbo MR, Altieri C, Bevilacqua A, Campaniello D, D'Amato D, Sinigaglia M (2005) Eur Food Res Technol 220:509–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fagan JD, Gormley TR, Ui Mhuircheartaigh MM (2004) Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 5:205–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. AOAC (1995) Official methods of analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD

  24. Goulas AE, Kontominas MG (2005) Food Chem 93:511–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kyrana VR, Lougovois VP, Valsamis DS (1997) Int J Food Sci Technol 32:339–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Christie WW (1982) In: Vanderzant C, Splittstoesser DF (eds) Lipid analysis, 2nd edn. Pergamon, Oxford

  27. Pearson D (1976) The chemical analysis of foods (7th edn). Livingston Churchil

  28. Malle P, Tao SH (1987) J Food Prot 50:756–760

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gomes HA, Silva EN, Nascimento MRL, Fukuma HT (2003) Food Chem 80:433–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Karakoltsidis PA, Zotos A, Constantinides SM (1995) J Food Composition Anal 8:258–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bandarra NM, Batista I, Nunes ML, Empis JM (2001) Eur Food Res Technol 212:535–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Connell JJ (1990) Methods of assessing and selecting for quality. In: Connell JJ (ed) Control of fish quality. Fishing News Books, Oxford, pp 122–150

    Google Scholar 

  33. Metin S, Erkan N, Varlik C, Aran N (2001) Eur Food Res Technol 213:174–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Farber JM (1991) J Food Prot 54:58–70

    Google Scholar 

  35. Boskou G, Debevere J (2000) Food Addit Contam 17:17–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. EEC (1995) Commission Decision 95/149/EEC of 8 March 1995, relating to total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) limit values for certain categories of fishery products and specifying the analysis methods to be used. Off J Eur Commun, L 97, pp 84–87

  37. Debevere J, Boskou G (1996) Int J Food Microbiol 31:221–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Boskou G, Debevere J (1997) Food Microbiol 14:543–553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kyrana VR, Lougovois VP (2002) Int J Food Sci Technol 37:319–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Raharjo S, Sofos JN (1993) Meat Sci 35:145–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fernandez J, Perez-Alvarez JA, Fernandez-Lopez JA (1997) Food Chem 59:345–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Guillen MD, Ruiz A (2004) Food Chem 86:297–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Curzio OA, Quaranta HO (1982) Lebensm-Wiss u-Technol 15:171–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bak LS, Andersen AB, Andersen EM, Bertelsen G (1999) Food Chem 64:169–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Pastoriza L, Sampedro G, Herrera JJ, Cabo ML (1998) Food Chem 61:23–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Krizek M, Vacha F, Vorlova L, Lukasova J, Cupakova S (2004) Food Chem 88:185–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonios E. Goulas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goulas, A.E., Kontominas, M.G. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging and vacuum packaging on the shelf-life of refrigerated chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus): biochemical and sensory attributes. Eur Food Res Technol 224, 545–553 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0316-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0316-y

Keywords

Navigation