Skip to main content
Log in

Antioxidant properties of some commonly consumed and underutilized tropical legumes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The antioxidant properties of some commonly consumed [cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)] and underutilized [pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) and African yam bean (Sphenostylis sternocarpa)] legumes were assessed with regard to their Vitamin C, total phenol, and phytate content, as well as antioxidant activity as typified by their reducing power and free radical scavenging ability. The Vitamin C content of the cowpeas ranged from 0.5 to 0.9 mg/100 g, while that of underutilized legumes were 0.9 mg/100 g for pigeon pea and 0.8 mg/100 g for African yam beans. The phenol content of the cowpeas were 0.3–1.0 mg/g, African yam bean had 0.7 mg/g total phenols, while pigeon pea contained 0.4 (white) and 1.2 mg/g (brown) total phenol content, respectively. The phytate content of all the legumes [cowpea (2.0–2.9%), pigeon pea (2.0–2.4%), African yam beans (2.4%)] analyzed were generally high, while the reducing power and free radical scavenging ability for all the legumes were very low except in African yam beans (23.6%), cowpea brown (29.9%), and pigeon pea brown (54.5%) that had a relatively high free radical scavenging ability. Therefore, one of the commonly consumed cowpea V. unguiculata (brown) and underutilized legumes C. cajan (brown) and S. sternocarpa could be considered as a functional food due to their relatively higher antioxidant activity (free radical scavenging ability and redox potential) which could be as a result of their relative higher total phenol content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beninger CW, Hosfield GL, Nair MG (1998) J Agric Food Chem 46:2906–2910

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Romani A, Vignolini P, Galardi C, Mulinacci N, Benedettelli S, Heimler D (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:3838–3842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazur WM, Duke JA, Wahala K, Rasku S, Adelcreutz H (1998) Nutr Biochem 9:193–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van Acker SA, van Balen GP, van den Berg DJ, Bast A, van der Vijgh WJ (1998) Biochem Pharmacol 56:935–943

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sestili P, Guidarelli A, Dacha M, Cantoni O (1998) Free Radic Biol Med 25:196–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Amic D, Davidovic-Amic D, Beslo D, Trinajstic N (2003) Croatia Chem Acta 76:55–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alia M, Horcajo C, Bravo L, Goya L (2003) Nutr Res 23:1251–1267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang YZ, Yang S, Wu G (2002) Nutrition 18:872–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heim KE, Tagliaferro AR, Bobilya DJ (2002) J Nutr Biochem 13:572–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, Papanga G (1997) Trends Plant Sci 2:152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cardador-Martinez A, Loarca-Pina G, Oomah BD (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:6975–6980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brad M (2003) Econ Bot 57:254–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oboh G, Akindahunsi AA (2004) Nutr Health 18:29–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oboh G (2005) Lebensm.-Wiss.u.-Technol 38(5):513–517

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun J, Chu Y, Wu X, Liu R (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:7449–7454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chu Y, Sun J, Wu X, Liu RH (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:6910–6916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM (1999) Method Enzym 299:152–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wheeler EL, Ferrel RE (1971) Cereal Chem 48:312–316

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pulido R, Bravo L, Saura-Calixto F (2000) J Agric Food Chem 48:3396–3402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ursini F, Maiorino M, Morazzoni P, Roveri A, Pifferi G (1994) Free Radic Biol Med 16:547–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, USA, p 620

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jiratanan T, Liu RH (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:2659–2670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Doblado R, Zielinski H, Piskula M, Kozlowska H, Munoz R, Friäas J, Vidal-Valverde CN(2005) J Agric Food Chem 53:1215–1222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vinci G, Botr F, Mele G, Ruggieri G (1995) Food Chem 53:211–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Oboh G, Akindahunsi AA, Oshodi AA (2003) Plants Food Hum Nutr 58:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sudheer KM, Sridhar RB, Kiran BS, Bhilegaonkar PM, Shirwaikar A, Unnikrishnan MK (2004) Indian J Exp Biol 42(2):179–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oboh G, Igbakin PA (2002) J Sci Eng Tech 9(4):4505–4508

    Google Scholar 

  29. Akindahunsi AA, Oboh G (1999) Riv Ital Sost Grasse 76:285–287

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yang J, Lin H, Mau J (2002) Food Chem 77:229–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Allhorn M, Klapyta A, Akerstrom B (2005) Free Radic Biol Med 38(5):557–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gogvadze V, Walter PB, Ames BN (2003) Arch Biochem Biophys 414(2):255–260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ, Paganga G (1996) Free Radic Biol Med 20(7):933–956

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ganiyu Oboh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oboh, G. Antioxidant properties of some commonly consumed and underutilized tropical legumes. Eur Food Res Technol 224, 61–65 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0289-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0289-x

Keywords

Navigation