Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of high O2 levels on post-harvest quality and shelf life of table grapes during long-term storage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Freshly harvested ‘Kyoho’ table grapes (Vitis vinifera × V. labrusca) were stored in controlled atmospheric chambers, either in air, 80% O2, or 40% O2 + 30% CO2, for up to 60 days at 0 °C in 95% relative humidity followed by 5 days in air at 20 °C. Physical and chemical properties were recorded initially and at 15-day intervals during storage. Storage in 80% O2 or 40% O2 + 30% CO2 improved berry hardness, springiness, chewiness, flavors and membrane integrity over control stored in air. In addition, these high O2 storage conditions significantly reduced fruit decay, berry drop, rachis browning and weight loss, delayed the decrease of soluble solids, titratable acidity and ascorbic acid of table grapes, compared with storage in air. Treatment in 80% O2 resulted in a significantly firmer berry, better texture, berry adherence strength, and sensory scores than those treated with 40% O2 + 30% CO2, but did not significantly affect cohesiveness, springiness, aroma and membrane integrity. Data obtained in this study suggest that high oxygen treatment improve the quality of table grapes and extend its shelf life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. He PC (1999) Viticulture. Chinese Agriculture Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lydakis D, Aked J (2003) Postharvest Biol Techno 127:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crisosto CH, Garner D, Crisosto G (2002) Postharvest Biol Technol 26:26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harvey JM, Uota M (1978) Int J Refrig 1:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smilanick JL, Harvey JM, Hartsell PL, Henson DJ, Harris CM, Fouse DC, Assemi M (1990) Plant Dis 74:74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yahia EM, Nelson KE, Kader AA (1983) J Am Soc Hort Sci 108:1067–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Bachir M (1999) Radiat Phys Chem 55:55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Artés-Hernández F, Aguayo E, Artés F (2004) Postharvest Biol Technol 31:31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Allende A, Luo YG, McEvoy JL, Artés F, Wang CY (2004) Postharvest Biol Technol 33:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tian SP, Xu Y, Jiang AL, Gong QQ (2002) Postharvest Biol Technol 24:24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amanatidou A, Slump RA, Gorris LGM, Smid EJ (2000) J Food Sci 65:65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Day BPF (1996) Postharv News Info 7:31N–34N

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heimdal H, Kuhn BF, Poll L, Larsen LM (1995) J Food Sci 60:1265–1268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aharoni Y, Houck LG (1982) J Food Sci 47:2091–2092.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu CW, Toivonen PMA (2000) Postharvest Biol Technol 18:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duan XW, Jiang YM, Su XG, Liu H, Li YB, Zhang ZQ, Zheng YH, Jiang WB (2004) Plant Sci 167:167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wszelaki AL, Mitcham EJ (2000) Postharvest Biol Technol 20:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van der Steen C, Jacxsens L, Devlieghere F, Debevere J (2002) Postharvest Biol Technol 26:26

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alvarez MD, Canet W, López ME (2002) Eur Food Res Technol 215:215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng GP, Yang HS, Li YF (2004) Lebensm.-bliss u.-Technol (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Han YS (1992) Experimental Guidance of Food Chemistry. Beijing Agriculture University Press, Beijing, Chinese

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kader AA, Lipton WJ, Morris LL (1973) Hort Sci 8:8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alvarez MD, Saunders DEJ, Vincent JFV (2000) Eur Food Res Technol 210:210

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frenkel C (1975) Plant Physiol 55:480–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu YM, Ren JC, Hua XZ (1992) Acta Phytophysiol Sin 18:18

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brown KM (1997) Physiol Plant 100:100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lieberman M, Biale JB (1956) Plant Physiol 31:31

    Google Scholar 

  28. Toivonen PMA (1992) J Hortic Sci 67:67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zheng YH, Su XG, Li QS, Li YN, Xi YF (2000) Plant Physiol Commun 36:36 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Barker J, Mapson LW (1952) (New Phytol) 51:51

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunfei Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deng, Y., Wu, Y. & Li, Y. Effects of high O2 levels on post-harvest quality and shelf life of table grapes during long-term storage. Eur Food Res Technol 221, 392–397 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-1186-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-1186-4

Keywords

Navigation