Skip to main content
Log in

Cocoa substitute: Evaluation of sensory qualities and flavour stability

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past few years, the price of cocoa has climbed very rapidly, so there is increasing incentive in food industry to find a real cocoa substitute. A mixture of milled chicory roots and carob pods (1:2, w/w) was used for preparation of real cocoa substitute via Maillard technology. Comparative studies concerning sensory characteristics and headspace volatiles were carried out between the real cocoa and prepared cocoa substitute. The sensory evaluation revealed high quality of the cocoa substitute sample in comparison with the real cocoa sample. The comparative odour profile analysis showed that the cocoa-like and sweetish/caramel attributes scored higher in cocoa sample than in cocoa substitute sample, whereas the roasty/earthy attributes showed an opposite trend. The chocolate attribute exhibited the same quality in both samples. The storage of the cocoa substitute sample for 6 months gave rise to an increase in the chocolate attribute. The other attributes showed opposite behaviour. The headspace volatiles of both real cocoa and cocoa substitute were isolated and subjected to gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometric (GC–MS) analysis. Most of the volatile compounds identified in real cocoa especially the key odorants were represented in the cocoa substitute sample. The two compounds, 2-phenyl-2-butenal and 5-methyl-2-phenyl-2-hex-2-enals, that are important contributors to chocolate aroma, showed noticeable increase after storage of cocoa substitute sample for 6 months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonvehi JS, Coll FV (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:3743–3750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jinap MS, Jamilah B, Nazamid S (2004) Food Chem 85:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ziegleder G (1988) In: Linskens H, Jackson JF (eds) Modern methods of plant analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 289–299

  4. Danehy JP (1983) CHEMTECH July:412–418

  5. Walpuski J, Kruse HP, Hoppe K (1990) German Democratic Republic Patent

  6. Lau B, Pearson AM (1980) Modern Dairy May/June:12–15

  7. Albanell E, Plaixats J, Caja G (1993) J Sci Food Agric 63:309–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arrighi WJ, Hartman TG, Ho CT (1997) Perfumer Flavorist 22:31–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sannai A, Fujimori T, Kato K (1982) Agric Biol Chem 46:429–433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baek HH, Cadwallader KR (1998) J Food Sci 63:234–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayer F, Grosch W (2001) Flav Fragr J 16:180–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fadel HHM, Farouk A (2002) Amino Acids 22:199–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Adams RP (1995) Allured Publishing, Carol Steam Illinois, USA

  14. Schnermann P, Schieberle P (1997) J Agric Food Chem 45:867–872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cantalejo MJ (1997) J Agric Food Chem 45:1354–1350

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nijssen L, Visscher C, Maarse H, Willemsens L, Boelens M (1996) Nutrition and Food Research Institute, Zeist The Netherlands, NO. 71

  17. Keeny PG (1972) J AOCS 49:567–572

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koehler PE, Masan ME, Odell GV (1971) J Food Sci 36:816–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ziegleder G (1991) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 193:32–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vitzthum O, Werkhoff P, Hubert P (1975) J Food Sci 40:911–916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Arnoldi A, Arnoldi C, Baldi O, Griffini A (1988) J Agric Food Chem 36:988–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Darsley RR, Quesnel VC (1972) J Sci Food, Agric 23:215–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Holscher (1990) Café Cacao The 34:205–212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Praag M, Stein H, Tibbetts S (1968) J Agric Food Chem 16:1005–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Izzo HV, Ho CT (1993) J Agric Food Chem 41:2364–2367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Flament I (1991) In: Maarse H (ed) Volatile compounds in foods and beverages. Marcel Delker, Inc, New York, pp 617–669

  27. Silwar R, Tressl R (1989) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 189:205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baltes W, Mevissen L (1988) Z-Lebensm Unters Forsch 187:209–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Walardt JP, Lindsay RC, Libbey LM (1970) J Agric Food Chem 18:926–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Counet C, Callemien D, Ouwerx C, Collin S (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:2385–2391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kanjahn D, Maier HG (1997) Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau 93:110–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoda H. M. Fadel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fadel, H.H.M., Abdel Mageed, M.A., Abdel Samad, A.K.M.E. et al. Cocoa substitute: Evaluation of sensory qualities and flavour stability. Eur Food Res Technol 223, 125–131 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0162-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0162-3

Keywords

Navigation