Abstract
By using a new adsorbent (sepiolite) an adsorptionelution and atomic absorption spectrometric method has been developed for the preconcentration and determination of Fe and Pb. Recoveries of the analytes were 82 ± 3% for Fe and 91 ± 2% for Pb at 95% confidence level. For Cu it was only 5 ± 1%. The recovery of iron could be increased to about 97 ± 1% by complexing with EDTA, the recovery of copper only to 57 ± 2%. The optimised method was applied to the determination of lead in metal materials (e.g. brass).
References
Minczewski J, Chwastowska J, Dybczynski R (1982) Separation and preconcentration methods in inorganic trace analysis. Ellis Horwood, Chichester
Mizuike A (1983) Enrichment techniques for inorganic trace analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Arık N, Türker AR (1991) Fresenius J Anal Chem 339: 874
Türker AR, Tunçeli A (1993) Fresenius J Anal Chem 345: 755
Soylak M, Elçi L, Doğan M (1994) Fresenius J Anal Chem 348: 1758
Kantipully L, Katragodds S, Chow A, Gesser HD (1990) Talanta 37: 491
Terada K (1991) Anal Sci 7: 187
Yang XG, Jackwerth E (1987) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 327: 179
Yang XG, Jackwerth E (1988) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 331: 588
Doğan M, Elçi L (1984) Spectrochim Acta 39B: 1189
Sengupta B, Das J (1989) Anal Chim Acta 219: 339
Sarıkaya Y, Aybar S (1978) Comm Fac Sci University d’Ankara 33.
Erdoğan B et al (1985) 7th National Clay Symposium, Ankara
Nagy B, Bradley WF (1955) Am Mineral 40: 885
Brindley GW (1959) Am Mineral 44: 495
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Türker, A.R., Bağ, H. & Erdoğan, B. Determination of iron and lead by flame atomic absorption spectrometry after preconcentration with sepiolite. Z. Anal. Chem. 357, 351–353 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160050166
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160050166