Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of target DNA with a novel Cas9/sgRNAs-associated reverse PCR (CARP) technique

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study develops a new method for detecting target DNA based on Cas9 nuclease, which was named as CARP, representing CRISPR- or Cas9/sgRNAs-associated reverse PCR. This technique detects target DNA in three steps: (1) cleaving the detected DNA sample with Cas9 in complex with a pair of sgRNAs specific to target DNA; (2) ligating the cleaved DNA with DNA ligase; (3) amplifying target DNA with PCR. In the ligation step, the Cas9-cut target DNA was ligated into intramolecular circular or intermolecular concatenated linear DNA. In the PCR step, the ligated DNA was amplified with a pair of reverse primers. The technique was verified by detecting HPV16 and HPV18 L1 genes in nine different human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes. The technique also detected the L1 and E6–E7 genes of two high-risk HPVs, HPV16 and HPV18, in the genomic DNA of two HPV-positive cervical carcinoma cells (HeLa and SiHa), in which no L1 and E6–E7 genes were detected in the HPV-negative cervical carcinoma cell, C-33a. By performing these proof-of-concept experiments, this study provides a new CRISPR-based DNA detection and typing method. Especially, the CARP method developed by this study is ready for the clinical HPV detection, which was supported by the final clinical sample detection.

CRISPR-associated reverse PCR (CARP) can be used to detect and type target DNA in a simple three-step procedure, cutting, ligation, and amplification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ishino Y, Shinagawa H, Makino K, Amemura M, Nakata A. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:5429–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jansen R, Embden J, Gaastra W, Schouls L. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43:1565–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Makarova KS, Aravind L, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biol Direct. 2011;6:38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Makarova KS, Haft DH, Barrangou R, Brouns SJ, Charpentier E, Horvath P, et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Doudna JA, Charpentier E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346:1258096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337:816–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, Agarwala V, Scott DA, Zhang F. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:2281–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang T, Wei JJ, Sabatini DM, Lander ES. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science. 2014;343:80–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sander JD, Joung JK. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:347–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 2014;157:1262–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chavez A, Tuttle M, Pruitt BW, Ewen-Campen B, Chari R, Ter-Ovanesyan D, et al. Comparison of Cas9 activators in multiple species. Nat Methods. 2016;13:563–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu W, Yu H, Zhou X, Xing D. In vitro evaluation of CRISPR/Cas9 function by an Electrochemiluminescent assay. Anal Chem. 2016;88:8369–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pardee K, Green AA, Takahashi MK, Braff D, Lambert G, Lee JW, et al. Rapid, low-cost detection of Zika virus using programmable biomolecular components. Cell. 2016;165:1255–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Lee JW, Essletzbichler P, Dy AJ, Joung J, et al. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science. 2017;356:438–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinheiro LB, Coleman VA, Hindson CM, Herrmann J, Hindson BJ, Bhat S, et al. Evaluation of a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction format for DNA copy number quantification. Anal Chem. 2012;84:1003–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hindson BJ, Ness KD, Masquelier DA, Belgrader P, Heredia NJ, Makarewicz AJ, et al. High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. Anal Chem. 2011;83:8604–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hindson CM, Chevillet JR, Briggs HA, Gallichotte EN, Ruf IK, Hindson BJ, et al. Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR. Nat Methods. 2013;10:1003–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boshart M, Gissmann L, Ikenberg H, Kleinheinz A, Scheurlen W, zur Hausen H. A new type of papillomavirus DNA, its presence in genital cancer biopsies and in cell lines derived from cervical cancer. EMBO J. 1984;3:1151–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu F, Cao M, Shi Q, Chen H, Wang Y, Li X. Integration of the full-length HPV16 genome in cervical cancer and Caski and Siha cell lines and the possible ways of HPV integration. Virus Genes. 2015;50:210–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kilic G, Cardillo M, Ozdemirli M, Arun B. Human papillomavirus 18 oncoproteins E6 and E7 enhance irradiation- and chemotherapeutic agent-induced apoptosis in p53 and Rb mutated cervical cancer cell lines. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1999;20:167–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. zur Hausen H. Human papillomaviruses in the pathogenesis of anogenital cancer. Virology. 1991;184:9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. zur Hausen H. Papillomaviruses in the causation of human cancers—a brief historical account. Virology. 2009;384:260–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189:12–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Faridi R, Zahra A, Khan K, Idrees M. Oncogenic potential of human papillomavirus (HPV) and its relation with cervical cancer. Virol J. 2011;8:269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Farhat S, Scott M, Ma Y, Moscicki A-B. Development of a novel liquid bead array human papillomavirus genotyping assay (PGMY-LX) and comparison with linear array for continuity in longitudinal cohort studies. J Clin Microbiol. 2015:JCM. 03100–14.

  26. Tommasino M, editor. The human papillomavirus family and its role in carcinogenesis. Semin Cancer Biol; 2014: Elsevier.

  27. Han LL, Maimaitiming T, Husaiyin S, Wang L, Wusainahong K, Ma CH, et al. Comparative study of HPV16 integration in cervical lesions between ethnicities with high and low rates of infection with high-risk HPV and the correlation between integration rate and cervical neoplasia. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2015;10:2169–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rao A, Young S, Erlich H, Boyle S, Krevolin M, Sun R, et al. Development and characterization of the cobas human papillomavirus test. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:1478–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abreu AL, Souza RP, Gimenes F, Consolaro ME. A review of methods for detect human papillomavirus infection. Virol J. 2012;9:262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Doorbar J, Quint W, Banks L, Bravo IG, Stoler M, Broker TR, et al. The biology and life-cycle of human papillomaviruses. Vaccine. 2012;30:F55–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tao P, Zheng W, Wang Y, Bian M-L. Sensitive HPV genotyping based on the flow-through hybridization and gene chip. BioMed Research International. 2012;2012.

  32. Syrjänen S, Lodi G, von Bültzingslöwen I, Aliko A, Arduino P, Campisi G, et al. Human papillomaviruses in oral carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders: a systematic review. Oral Dis. 2011;17:58–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Karlsen F, Kalantari M, Jenkins A, Pettersen E, Kristensen G, Holm R, et al. Use of multiple PCR primer sets for optimal detection of human papillomavirus. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:2095–100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Depuydt CE, Boulet GA, Horvath CA, Benoy IH, Vereecken AJ, Bogers JJ. Comparison of MY09/11 consensus PCR and type-specific PCRs in the detection of oncogenic HPV types. J Cell Mol Med. 2007;11:881–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Woodman CB, Collins SI, Young LS. The natural history of cervical HPV infection: unresolved issues. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:11–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pattanayak V, Lin S, Guilinger JP, Ma E, Doudna JA, Liu DR. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:839–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mali P, Aach J, Stranges PB, Esvelt KM, Moosburner M, Kosuri S, et al. CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:833–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu X, Scott DA, Kriz AJ, Chiu AC, Hsu PD, Dadon DB, et al. Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:670–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein JA, Ran FA, Konermann S, Agarwala V, et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:827–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ran FA, Hsu PD, Lin C-Y, Gootenberg JS, Konermann S, Trevino AE, et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell. 2013;154:1380–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Montague TG, Cruz JM, Gagnon JA, Church GM, Valen E. CHOPCHOP: a CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN web tool for genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:W401–W7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 61571119).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xinyi Xia or Jinke Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

All procedures used in the present study were performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of Jinling Hospital (Nanjing, China) approved the present study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Wang, Q., Xu, X. et al. Detection of target DNA with a novel Cas9/sgRNAs-associated reverse PCR (CARP) technique. Anal Bioanal Chem 410, 2889–2900 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0873-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0873-5

Keywords

Navigation