Abstract
This paper presents an open, personal, fresh approach to the future of Analytical Chemistry in the context of the deep changes Science and Technology are anticipated to experience. Its main aim is to challenge young analytical chemists because the future of our scientific discipline is in their hands. A description of not completely accurate overall conceptions of our discipline, both past and present, to be avoided is followed by a flexible, integral definition of Analytical Chemistry and its cornerstones (viz., aims and objectives, quality trade-offs, the third basic analytical reference, the information hierarchy, social responsibility, independent research, transfer of knowledge and technology, interfaces to other scientific–technical disciplines, and well-oriented education). Obsolete paradigms, and more accurate general and specific that can be expected to provide the framework for our discipline in the coming years are described. Finally, the three possible responses of analytical chemists to the proposed changes in our discipline are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Valcárcel M (2000) Principles of Analytical Chemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Kellner R, Mermet JM, Otto M, Valcárcel M, Widmer HM (2004) Analytical Chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Valcárcel M (2012) In: Krull S (ed) Analytical Chemistry, InTech Open Access Pu., Croatia
The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1991) 3rd ed. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK
Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language (1981) Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.: Chicago, IL
Matlin S, Mehta G, Hopf H (2015) Chemistry embraced by all. Science 347(6227):1179–1180
Sweedler JV et al (2015) Editorial: The scope of analytical chemistry. Anal Chem 87:5457–5457
Valcárcel M, Lendl B (2004) Analytical chemistry at the interface between metrology and problem solving. Trends Anal Chem 23:527–534
Valcárcel M, Rios A (2000) Required and delivered analytical information: the need for consistency. Trends Anal Chem 19:593–598
Valcárcel M, Simonet BM (2008) Types of analytical information and their mutual relationships. Trends Anal Chem 27:490–499
Valcárcel M, Lucena R (2013) Synergistic relationships between analytical chemistry and written standards. Anal Chim Acta 788:1–7
Valcárcel M, Cárdenas S (2005) Vanguard-rearguard analytical strategies. Trends Anal Chem 24:67–74
Valcárcel M, Simonet BM, Cárdenas S (2007) Bridging the gap between analytical R&D products and their use in practice. Analyst 132:97–100
Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Thostrup P, Besenbacher F (2011) Scientific social responsibility: a call to arms. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:2–4
Valcárcel M, Lucena R (2012) Social responsibility in Analytical Chemistry. Trends Anal Chem 31:1–7
Valcárcel M, Christian GD, Lucena R (2013) Teaching social responsibility in analytical chemistry. Anal Chem 85:6152–6161
Laitinen HA, Harris WE (1975) Chemical Analysis. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York
Salzer R (2004) Euro-curriculum II for Analytical Chemistry approved by the DAC-FECS. Anal Bioanal Chem 378:28–32
Salzer R (2014) Educating tomorrow’s chemists. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:3251–3255
Leito I, Helm I, Jalukse L (2015) Using MOOCs for teaching analytical chemistry: experience at the University of Tartu. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:1277–1281
Valcárcel M (2001) Teaching the essential principles. Anal Chem 85:333A–335A
Valcárcel M, Rios A (1993) The hierarchy and relationships of analytical properties. Anal Chem 65:781A–787A
Valcárcel M, Rios A (1997) Teaching analytical properties. Fresenius J Anal Chem 357:202–205
Valcárcel M, Luque de Castro MD (1995) A hierarchical approach to analytical chemistry. Trends Anal Chem 14:242–250
Valcárcel M (2011) Is a new approach to Analytical Chemistry possible? Talanta 85:17071708
Baena JR, Valcárcel M (2003) Total indices in analytical sciences. Trends Anal Chem 22:641–652
Simonet BM, Lendl B, Valcárcel M (2006) Method-defined parameters: measurands sometimes forgotten. Trends Anal Chem 25:520–527
Baena JR, Gallego M, Valcárcel M (2002) Markers in Analytical Chemistry. Trends Anal Chem 21:878–888
Thomas JDR (1996) Reliability versus uncertainty for analytical measurements. Analyst 121:1519–1519
Whitesides GM (2015) Reinventing chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:3196–3209
Dyson FJ (2012) Is Science mostly driven by ideas or by tools? Science 338:1426–1427
Acknowledgments
The author expresses his gratitude to the jury of the 2015 DAC-EuCheMS Award (Professors Reiner Salzer, Wolfgang Linder, Jonas Bergquist, and Jüerguen Popp) for proposing his candidature, and to the Division of Analytical Chemistry of the European Association of Chemical and Molecular Sciences for endorsing it.
A number of colleagues have contributed enlightening comments to the manuscript draft.
The author is also grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for funding Project CTQ2014-52939R.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The opinions contained in this paper are of the exclusive responsibility of the author. They may not be shared by other analytical chemists, who are welcome to criticize them. After all, nobody is in possession of the whole truth about anything.
Additional information
To young analytical chemists, who should play a central role in increasing appreciation of our discipline by developing cutting-edge interdisciplinary research.
This article is based on the DAC-EuCheMS Lecture held during Euroanalysis 2015.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valcárcel, M. Quo vadis, analytical chemistry?. Anal Bioanal Chem 408, 13–21 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9148-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9148-6