Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Critical investigation of the substituent distribution in the polymer chains of hydroxypropyl methylcelluloses by (LC-)ESI-MS

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three hydroxypropyl methylcellulose samples (HPMC1–3, DSMe = 1.45, 1.29, and 1.36; MSHP = 0.28, 0.46, and 0.84) were analyzed with respect to their methyl and hydroxypropyl substitution pattern in the polymer chains. Ionization yield of HPMC oligomers in electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry (ESI-IT-MS) is strongly influenced by the hydroxypropyl pattern. Therefore, a sample derivatization procedure, as well as suitable measurement conditions that enable relative quantification were elaborated. Analysis was performed by negative ESI-IT-MS after per(deutero)methylation, partial depolymerization, and reductive amination with m-aminobenzoic acid. Measurement parameters like solvent, trap drive, and voltages of the ion transportation unit were studied with regard to the suitability for quantitative evaluation. Using direct infusion of the samples, strong influence of trap drive and octopole settings was observed. Optimized measurement conditions were used for the determination of the HP pattern of the permethylated samples by direct infusion. The methyl pattern was determined from the perdeuteromethylated samples by high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. For HPMC1, substituents were both found to fit the random distribution model. The other two samples showed pronounced heterogeneity which could be interpreted in more detail by extracting methyl subpatterns depending on the number of HP groups.

Determination of the substituent distribution in hydroxypropyl methylcellulose oligomers by ESI-IT-MS (negative mode) after labeling with m-aminobenzoic acid

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACN:

Acetonitrile

AGU:

Anhydroglucose unit

DP:

Degree of polymerization

DSMe :

Degree of methyl substitution

EIC:

Extracted ion chromatogram

ESI:

Electrospray ionization

GLC:

Gas–liquid chromatography

HP:

Hydroxypropyl

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

HPMC:

Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose

IT:

Ion trap

mABA:

m-aminobenzoic acid

Me:

Methyl

MS:

Mass spectrometry

MSHP :

Molar degree of hydroxypropyl substitution

r.t.:

Room temperature

References

  1. Thielking H, Schmidt M (2006) Cellulose ethers. In: Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley, New York

  2. Siepmann J, Kranz H, Bodmeier R, Peppas NA (1999) HPMC-matrices for controlled drug delivery: a new model combining diffusion, swelling, and dissolution mechanisms and predicting the release kinetics. Pharm Res 16:1748–1756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haque A, Richardson RK, Morris ER, Gidley MJ, Caswell DC (1993) Thermogelation of methylcellulose. Part II: effect of hydroxypropyl substituents. Carbohydr Polym 22:175–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burchard W (2003) Solubility and solution structure of cellulose derivatives. Cellulose 10:213–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mischnick P, Momcilovic D (2010) Chemical structure analysis of starch and cellulose derivatives. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem 64:117–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Viridén A, Wittgren B, Andersson T, Abrahmsén-Alami S, Larsson A (2009) Influence of substitution pattern on solution behavior of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Biomacromolecules 10:522–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adden R, Müller R, Mischnick P (2006) Fractionation of methyl cellulose according to polarity—a tool to differentiate first and second order heterogeneity of the substituent distribution. Macromol Chem Phys 207:954–965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuers J, Unterieser I, Burchard W, Adden R, Rinken M, Mischnick P (2012) Simultaneous determination of substituent patterns in partially acid hydrolyzed O–Me/O–Me-d 3-cellulose and quantification of the obtained oligomers by HPLC-ESI-MS. Carbohydr Res 348:55–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mischnick P, Adden R (2008) Fractionation of polysaccharide derivatives and subsequent analysis to differentiate heterogeneities on various hierarchical levels. Macromol Symp 262:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arisz PW, Kauw HJJ, Boon JJ (1995) Substituent distribution along the cellulose backbone in O-methylcelluloses using GC and FAB-MS for monomer and oligomer analysis. Carbohydr Res 271:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mischnick P, Heinrich J, Gohdes M, Wilke O, Rogmann N (2000) Structure analysis of 1,4-glucan derivatives. Macromol Chem Phys 201:1985–1995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heinrich J, Mischnick P (1996) Rapid method for the determination of the substitution pattern of O-methylated 1,4-glucans by high-pH anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. J Chromatogr A 749:41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Voiges K, Adden R, Rinken M, Mischnick P (2012) Critical re-investigation of the alditol acetate method for analysis of substituent distribution in methyl cellulose. Cellulose 19:993–1004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazik W, Heinze T, Pfeiffer K, Albrecht G, Mischnick P (2002) Starch derivatives of a high degree of functionalization. VI. Multistep carboxymethylation. J Appl Polym Sci 86:743–752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mischnick P (2012) Mass spectrometric characterization of oligo- and polysaccharides and their derivatives. Adv Polym Sci 248:105–174

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lamari FN, Kuhn R, Karamanos NK (2003) Derivatization of carbohydrates for chromatographic, electrophoretic and mass spectrometric structure analysis. J Chromatogr B 793:15–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Adden R, Müller R, Mischnick P (2006) Analysis of the substituent distribution in the glucosyl units and along the polymer chain of hydroxypropylmethyl celluloses and statistical evaluation. Cellulose 13:459–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Unterieser I, Cuers J, Voiges K, Enebro J, Mischnick P (2011) Quantitative aspects in electrospray ionization ion trap and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of malto-oligosaccharides. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25:2201–2208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Unterieser I, Mischnick P (2011) Labeling of oligosaccharides for quantitative mass spectrometry. Carbohydr Res 346:68–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt A, Karas M, Dülcks T (2003) Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI? J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 14:492–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang L, Kebarle P (1993) Dependence of ion intensity in electrospray mass spectrometry on the concentration of the analytes in the electrosprayed solution. Anal Chem 65:3654–3667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schriemer DC, Li L (1997) Mass discrimination in the analysis of polydisperse polymers by MALDI time-of-flight mass spectrometry. 2. Instrumental issues. Anal Chem 69:4176–4183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kebarle P, Verkerk UH (2009) Electrospray: from ions in solution to ions in the gas phase, what we know now. Mass Spectrom Rev 28:898–917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kruve A, Herodes K, Leito I (2010) Optimization of electrospray interface and quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer parameters in pesticide liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 24:919–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Titato GM, Bicudo RC, Lanças FM (2007) Optimization of the ESI and APCI experimental variables for the LC/MS determination of s-triazines, methylcarbamates, organophosphorous, benzimidazoles, carboxamide and phenylurea compounds in orange samples. J Mass Spectrom 42:1348–1357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Murgasova R, Hercules D (2002) Polymer characterization by combining liquid chromatography with MALDI and ESI mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 373:481–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gruendling T, Guilhaus M, Barner-Kowollik C (2008) Quantitative LC-MS of polymers: determining accurate molecular weight distributions by combined size exclusion chromatography and electrospray mass spectrometry with maximum entropy data processing. Anal Chem 80:6915–6927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Byrd HCM, McEwen CN (2000) The limitations of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in the analysis of wide polydisperse polymers. Anal Chem 72:4568–4576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mischnick P (1989) Determination of the patterns of substitution of hydroxyethyl- and hydroxypropyl-cyclomaltoheptaoses. Carbohydr Res 192:233–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ciucanu I, Kerek F (1984) A simple and rapid method for the permethylation of carbohydrates. Carbohydr Res 131:209–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou S, Cook KD (2001) A mechanistic study of electrospray mass spectrometry: Charge gradients within electrospray droplets and their influence on ion response. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 12:206–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mischnick P, Kühn G (1996) Model studies on methyl amyloses: correlation between reaction conditions and primary structure. Carbohydr Res 290:199–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mischnick P, Unterieser I, Voiges K, Cuers J, Rinken M, Adden R (2013) A new method for the analysis of the substitution pattern of hydroxyethyl(methyl)-celluloses along the polysaccharide chain. Macromol Chem Phys (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institut für Lebensmittelchemie, Schleinitzstr. 20, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany

    Julia Cuers & Petra Mischnick

  2. Dow Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH, Werk Stade, Bützflether Sand, 21683, Stade, Germany

    Marian Rinken

  3. Dow Wolff Cellulosics GmbH, Research & Development, August-Wolff-Str. 13, 29699, Bomlitz, Germany

    Roland Adden

Authors
  1. Julia Cuers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marian Rinken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roland Adden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Petra Mischnick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Mischnick.

Additional information

Published in the topical collection Separation and Characterization of Natural and Synthetic Macromolecules with guest editors Albena Lederer and Peter J. Schoenmakers.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 2057 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuers, J., Rinken, M., Adden, R. et al. Critical investigation of the substituent distribution in the polymer chains of hydroxypropyl methylcelluloses by (LC-)ESI-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 405, 9021–9032 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7065-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7065-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation