Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical model for determining the binding constants between immunoglobulins, bivalent ligands, and monovalent ligands

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the equilibria between immunoglobulins (R 2), homo-bifunctional ligands (L 2), monovalent ligands (I), and their complexes. We present a mathematical model that can be used to estimate the concentration of each species present in a mixture of R 2, L 2, and I, given the initial conditions defining the total concentration of R 2, L 2, I, and four dissociation constants (\( K_{\rm{d}}^{\rm{inter}} \),\( K_{\rm{d}}^{\rm{intra}} \),\( K_{\rm{d}}^{\rm{mono}} \), and α). This model is based on fewer assumptions than previous models and can be used to describe exactly a broad range of experimental conditions. A series of curves illustrates the dependence of the equilibria upon the total concentrations of receptors and ligands, and the dissociation constants. We provide a set of guidelines for the design and analysis of experiments with a focus on estimating the binding constants from experimental binding isotherms. Two analytical equations relate the conditions for maximum aggregation in this system to the binding constants. This model is a tool to quantify the binding of immunoglobulins to antigens and a guide to understanding and predicting the experimental data of assays and techniques that employ immunoglobulins.

The fraction of immunoglobulin-bivalent ligand complexes that contain two or more immunoglobulins (\( {F_{{\tilde{1}}}} \)) depends on the total concentration of immunoglobulins. A series of curves illustrates the dependence of the equilibria upon the total concentrations of immunoglobulins, bivalent ligands, monovalent ligands, and the dissociation constants that describe the system

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murphy K, Travers P, Walport M (2008) Janeway’s immunobiology, 7th edn. Garland Science, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davies DR, Metzger H (1983) Structural basis of immunology. Annu Rev Immunol 1:87–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dembo M, Goldstein B (1978) Theory of equilibrium binding of symmetric bivalent haptens to cell surface antibody: application to histamine release from basophils. J Immunol 121:345–353

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein B, Wofsy C (1980) Theory of equilibrium binding of a bivalent ligand to cell surface antibody: the effect of antibody heterogeneity on cross-linking. J Math Biol 10:347–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wofsy C (1980) Analysis of a molecular signal for cell function in allergic reactions. Math Biosci 40:69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wofsy C, Goldstein B (1987) The effect of cooperativity on the equilibrium binding of symmetric bivalent ligands to antibodies: theoretical results with application to histamine release from basophils. Mol Immunol 24:151–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstein B (1988) Desensitization histamine release and the aggregation of IgE on human basophils. In: Perelson AS (ed) Theoretical Immunology. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  8. Posner RG, Wofsky C, Goldstein B (1995) The kinetics of bivalent ligand-bivalent receptor aggregation: ring formation and the breakdown of the equivalent site approximation. Math Biosci 126:171–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Posner RG, Subramanian K, Goldstein B, Thomas J, Feder T, Holowka D, Baird B (1995) Simultaneous cross-linking by two non triggering bivalent ligands causes synergistic signaling of IgE Fc epsilon RI complexes. J Immunol 155:3601–3609

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barisas BG (2003) Aggregation and gelation of divalent cell surface receptors by rigid polyvalent ligands: examination by theoretical, kinetic and thermodynamic techniques. Thermochim Acta 400:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hlavacek WS, Faeder JR, Blinov ML, Posner RG, Hucka M, Fontana W (2006) Rules for modeling signal-transduction systems. Sci STKE 344:re6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ercolani G, Piguet C, Borkovec M, Hamacek J (2007) Symmetry numbers and statistical factors in self-assembly and multivalency. J Phys Chem B 111:12195–12203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ercolani G (2003) Assessment of cooperativity in self-assembly. J Am Chem Soc 125:16097–16103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Page MI, Jencks WP (1971) Entropic contributions to rate accelerations in enzymic and intramolecular reactions and the chelate effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:1678–1683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Page MI (1973) The energetics of neighbouring group participation. Chem Soc Rev 2:295–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Luedtke R, Owen CS, Karush F (1980) Proximity of antibody binding sites studied by fluorescence energy transfer. Biochemistry 19:1182–1192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Saphire EO, Stanfield RL, Crispin MDM, Parren PWHI, Rudd PM, Dwek RA, Burton DR, Wilson IA (2002) Contrasting IgG structures reveal extreme asymmetry and flexibility. J Mol Biol 319:9–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Connors KA (1987) Binding constants: the measurement of molecular complex stability. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krishnamurthy VM, Semetey V, Bracher PJ, Shen N, Whitesides GM (2007) Dependence of effective molarity on linker length for an intramolecular protein-ligand system. J Am Chem Soc 129:1312–1320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mammen M, Choi S-K, Whitesides GM (1998) Polyvalent interactions in biological systems: implications for design and use of multivalent ligands and inhibitors. Angew Chem Int Ed 37:2754–2794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mack ET, Perez-Castillejos R, Suo Z, Whitesides GM (2008) Exact analysis of ligand-induced dimerization of monomeric receptors. Anal Chem 80:5550–5555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Borrebaeck CAK (2000) Antibodies in diagnostics—from immunoassays to protein chips. Immunol Today 21:379–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

R. Perez-Castillejos acknowledges the support from New Jersey Institute of Technology through starting faculty funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raquel Perez-Castillejos.

Electronic supplementary materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 245 kb)

ESM 2

(XLS 78 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mack, E.T., Cummings, L. & Perez-Castillejos, R. Mathematical model for determining the binding constants between immunoglobulins, bivalent ligands, and monovalent ligands. Anal Bioanal Chem 399, 1641–1652 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4477-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4477-y

Keywords

Navigation