Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality analytics of internet pharmaceuticals

  • Review
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trading pharmaceutical products through the Internet poses several challenges related to legal responsibilities, good distribution practices, information content and patient use, financial implications, but also regarding product quality. One of the major concerns is the well-known phenomenon of counterfeited and/or substandard drugs commercialized through rogue Internet sites. Therefore, controlling and assuring the quality of those products has become an important and challenging task for the authorities. This review gives an overview of the different quality attributes that can be evaluated to have a complete understanding of the quality of the finished pharmaceutical product traded through the Internet, as well as the current analytical techniques that serve this objective. Aspects considered are labelling and packaging, physicochemical quality attributes, identification and assay of active substances and/or excipients, impurity profiling, biopharmaceutical testing and data interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bloom BS, Iannacone RC (2006) Med Inform Internet Med 31:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bloom BS, Iannacone RC (1999) Ann Intern Med 131:830–833

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lorence D, Churchill R (2007) J Med Syst 31:551–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bostwick JM, Lineberry TW (2007) Expert Opin Drug Saf 6:9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang BA, Mackey T (2009) Am J Law Med 35:125–184

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baldas T, Natl Law J (2009) http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202431938670&hbxlogin=1

  7. United States Food and Drug Administration (2007) FDA finds consumers continue to buy potentially risky drugs over the Internet. Practice puts consumers at risk and may be more expensive than domestic purchasing. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2007/ucm108946.htm

  8. Lowe RF, Montagu D (2009) S Med Rev 2:35–44

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Pharmaceutical Society of Northern Ireland (2009) Professional standards and guidance for Internet pharmacy services. http://psni.org.uk/documents/316/Standards+on+Internet+Pharmacy.pdf. Accessed 1 Jun 2010

  10. European Alliance for Access to Safe Medicines (2008) The counterfeiting superhighway. Medicon Group Ltd, Surrey, UK

  11. Federaal Agentschap voor Geneesmiddelen en Gezondheidsproducten (2009) Koninklijk besluit van 21 januari 2009 houdende onderrichtingen voor de apothekers. Belgisch Staatsblad, Brussels, Belgium

  12. United States Food and Drug Administration (2010) Buying medicines over the Internet. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/BuyingUsingMedicineSafely/BuyingMedicinesOvertheInternet/default.htm. Accessed 1 Jun 2010

  13. State Food and Drug Administration P.R. China (2001) Drug administration law of the People's Republic of China. http://eng.sfda.gov.cn/cmsweb/webportal/W45649037/A48335975.html. Accessed 1 Jun 2010

  14. Newton PN et al (2006) Lancet Infect Dis 6:602–613

  15. Rodionova OY et al (2005) Anal Chim Acta 549:151–158

  16. World Health Organization (2010) Medicines: counterfeit medicines. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs275/en/index.html. Accessed 1 Jun 2010

  17. Veronin MA, Lee E, Lewis EN (2007) Ann Pharmacother 41:1111–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maurin JK et al (2007) J Pharm Biomed Anal 43:1514–1518

  19. Vivian JC (2009) US Pharm 34:42–45

    Google Scholar 

  20. Connor TH et al (2005) Am J Health Syst Pharm 62:475–484

    Google Scholar 

  21. Westenberger BJ et al (2005) Int J Pharm 306:56–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wood S et al (2009) Packag Dig 46(8):28–30

  23. Green MD et al (2007) J Pharm Biomed Anal 43:105–110

  24. De Spiegeleer B et al (2008) Anal Biochem 376:229–234

  25. Kaye ST (2007) Rapid pharmaceutical identification and verification system. US Patent 7(218):395

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kenyon TA et al (1999) Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 3:S347–S350

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Joseph-Charles J et al (2007) J Pharm Biomed Anal 44:1008–1013

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lindegardh N et al (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 42:430–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Onwujekwe O et al (2009) Malaria J 8:22

  30. Baert B et al (2009) Eur J Pharm Biopharm 72:275–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sengaloundeth S et al (2009) Malaria J 8:172

  32. Veronin MA, Nguyen NT (2008) Ann Pharmacother 42:613–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Arthur KE, Wolff JC, Carrier DJ (2004) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 18:678–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alabdalla MA (2005) Forensic Sci Int 152:185–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Uchiyama N et al (2009) Yakugaku Zasshi 130:263–270

  36. Patnala S, Kanfer I (2008) J Pharm Biomed Anal 48:440–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wolff JC, Thomson LA, Eckers C (2003) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:215–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ricci C et al (2007) Anal Bioanal Chem 387:551–559

  39. Ricci C et al (2008) Anal Chim Acta 623:178–186

  40. Nyadong L et al (2009) Anal Chem 81:4803–4812

  41. Steiner RR, Larson RL (2009) J Forensic Sci 54:617–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Fernandez FM et al (2006) ChemMedChem 1:702–705

  43. Shin YS et al (2007) Anal Chem 79:3514–3518

  44. Cody RB (2009) Anal Chem 81:1101–1107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Nyadong L, Galhena AS, Fernandez FM (2009) Anal Chem 81:7788–7794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Haddad R et al (2008) Anal Chem 80:2744–2750

  47. O'Donnell RM, Sun X, Harrington PDB (2008) Trends Anal Chem 27:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. AlHussaini SR (1996) Sci Justice 36:139–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lopes MB, Wolff JC (2009) Anal Chim Acta 633:149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lei Y, Luo ZY, Hu CQ (2008) J Near Infrared Spectrosc 16:349–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ricci C, Kazarian SG (2006) In: Lewis C, Owen GP (eds) Optics and photonics for counterterrorism and crime fighting II. SPIE-International Society for Optical Engineering. Bellingham, Washington, USA

  52. Ricci C (2007) Anal Bioanal Chem 389:1525–1532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. de Veij M et al (2007) J Raman Spectrosc 38:181–187

  54. Trefi S et al (2008) J Pharm Biomed Anal 47:103–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. de Veij M et al (2008) J Pharm Biomed Anal 46:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Blanco M et al (2006) J Pharm Sci 95:2137–2144

  57. Puchert T et al (2010) J Pharm Biomed Anal 51:138–145

  58. Balayssac S et al (2009) Spectrosc Eur 21:10–14

  59. Trefi S et al (2009) Magn Reson Chem 47:S163–S173

  60. Shah H (1992) Perspect Pharm Econ 4:3

    Google Scholar 

  61. Adegbolagun O, Olalade O, Osumah S (2007) Trop J Pharm Res 6:737–745

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tipke M et al (2008) Malaria J 7:95

  63. Shah VP (2005) In: Dressman J, Krämer J (eds) Pharmaceutical dissolution testing. Taylor & Francis, New York

  64. Loebenberg R (2008) Dissolution testing and quality by design (QbD). http://www.scitopics.com/Dissolution_Testing_and_Quality_by_Design_QbD.html

  65. Amin A, Kokwaro G (2007) Clin Pharm Ther 32:429–440

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Thakker KD, Chern WD (2003) Dissolut Technol 10:10–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Laserson KF et al (2001) Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 5:448–454

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Drug Quality and Registration (DruQuaR) Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Harelbekestraat 72, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    B. Baert & B. De Spiegeleer

Authors
  1. B. Baert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. De Spiegeleer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. De Spiegeleer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baert, B., De Spiegeleer, B. Quality analytics of internet pharmaceuticals. Anal Bioanal Chem 398, 125–136 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3912-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3912-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation