Skip to main content
Log in

Effects on feeding rate and biomarker responses of marine mussels experimentally exposed to propranolol and acetaminophen

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental risk assessments of human pharmaceuticals and other ‘emerging contaminants’ should integrate both population-relevant endpoints and biomarkers of potential modes of action in a range of species. Adult Mytilus galloprovincialis were exposed to the beta-adrenergic receptor blocker propranolol or to the anti-inflammatory drug acetaminophen (paracetamol), both commonly used therapeutic drugs present in aquatic ecosystems. Mussels were exposed under semi-static conditions for 10 days to either acetaminophen (CAS number 103-90-2; mean measured concentrations 23 and 403 µg/L) or propranolol hydrochloride (CAS number 318-98-9; mean measured propranolol concentrations 11 and 147 µg/L) at 15 ± 1 °C sea water. Feeding rate was assessed as an indicator of general toxicity. For propranolol, the 10-day no-observed effect concentration (feeding rateNOEC) and lowest observed effect concentration (feeding rateLOEC) were 11 and 147 µg/L, respectively. For acetaminophen, feeding rate was increased at both 23 and 403 µg/L, suggesting a 10-day feeding rateNOEC of 403 µg/L. Primarily, phase I carboxylesterase (CbE), phase II glutathione S-transferase (GST) and the anti-oxidant catalase activities were evaluated in digestive gland. Gill GST and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activities were also measured. Lipid peroxidation (LPO) levels were measured in both tissues to assess oxidative stress. Some enzymatic activities in liver were also reduced after propranolol exposure whilst acetaminophen enhanced them (CbE p < 0.05). Acetaminophen exposure significantly increased hepatic LPO levels and inhibited AChE activity in gill (10-day NOEC and LOEC of 23 and 403 µg/L, respectively), whereas propranolol (11 µg/L) enhanced gill GST.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fent K, Weston AA, Caminada D (2006) Aquat Toxicol 76:122–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kolpin DW, Skopec M, Meyer MT, Furlong ET, Zaugg SD (2004) Sci Total Environ 328:119–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas KV, Hilton MJ (2004) Mar Pollut Bull 49:436–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ternes TA (1998) Water Res 32:3245–3260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Owen SF, Giltrow E, Hugett DB, Hutchinson TH, Saye J, Winter MJ, Sumpter JP (2007) Aquat Toxicol 82:145–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang G, Liu B, Tang B, Zhang T, Xiang J (2006) Aquaculture 258:611–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Teyke T, Rosen SC, Weiss KR, Kupfermann I (1993) Brain Res 630:226–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dupont S, Mallefet J, Vanderlinden C (2004) Comp Biochem Physiol 138C:59–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kimura Y, Yoshida M, Morisawa M (2003) Developmental Biol 258:129–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huggett DB, Brooks BW, Peterson B, Foran CM, Schlenk D (2002) Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 43:229–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stanley JK, Ramirez AJ, Mottaleb M, Chambliss CK, Brooks BW (2006) Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1780–1786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Josephy PD (2005) Drug Met Rev 37:581–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stanley DW, Howard RW (1998) Amer Zool 38:369–381

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Osada M, Nomura T (1990) Prostaglandins 40:229–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nunes B, Carvalho F, Guilhermino L (2006) Chemosphere 62:581–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cajaraville MP, Ortiz-Zarragoitia M (2006) Aquat Toxicol 78:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Canesi L, Lorusso LC, Ciacci C, Regoli F, Poiana G, Gallo G, Marcommi A (2007) Chemosphere 69:994–1002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cajaraville MP, Porte C, Solé M, Borghi V, Martinez M, Chamorro J, Torreblanca A, Ortiz M, Orbea A, Soto M (2001) Biomarkers 6:335–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zorita I, Apraiz I, Ortiz-Zarragoitia M, Orbea A, Cancio I, Soto M, Marigómez I, Cajaraville MP (2007) Environ Pollut 148:236–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Satoh T, Hosokawa M (2006) Chem-Biol Interactions 162:195–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Galloway TS, Millward N, Browne MA, Depledge MH (2002) Aquat Toxicol 61:169–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Minier C, Forget-Leray J, Bjørnstad A, Camus L (2008) Mar Pollut Bull 56:1410–1415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Elliot CJH, Susswein AJ (2002) J Exp Biol 205:877–896

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jones OAH, Voulvoulis N, Lester JN (2002) Water Res 36:5013–5022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brun GL, Bernier M, Losier R, Doe K, Jackman P, Lee H-B (2006) Environ Toxicol Chem 25:2163–2176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Crane M, Watts C, Boucard T (2006) Sci Total Environ 367:23–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hutchinson TH, Bögi C, Winter MJ, Owens JW (2009) Aquat Toxicol 91:197–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ellman GL, Courtney KO, Andrers V Jr, Featherstone RM (1961) Biochem Pharmacol 7:88–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB (1974) J Biol Chem 249:7130–7139

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Aebi H (1974) In: Bergmayer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bradford M (1976) Anal Biochem 72:248–254.21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. OECD (2000) OECD Series on Testing and Assessment number 23 (reference ENV/JM/MONO(2000)6). OECD, Paris, France.

  33. Cleuvers M (2003) Toxicol Lett 142:185–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. George SG (1994) In: Malins DC, Ostrander GK (eds) Aquatic toxicology, molecular, biochemical and cellular perspectives. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gowland B, McIntosh A, Davies I, Moffat C, Webster L (2002) Mar Environ Res 54:231–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheung CC, Zheng GJ, Lam PK, Richardson BJ (2002) Mar Pollut Bull 45:181–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pascoe D, Karntanut W, Müller CT (2003) Chemosphere 51:521–528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gagné F, Bérubé E, Fournier M, Blaise C (2005) Comp Biochem Physiol 141C:332–337

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jaeschke H, Knight RT, Bajt ML (2003) Toxicol Let 144:279–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Peters LD, Nasci C, Livingstone DR (1998) Comp Biochem Physiol 121C:361–269

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gagné F, Blaise C, André C, Gagnon C, Salazar M (2007) Chemosphere 68:731–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. de la Lafontaine Y, Gagné F, Blaise C, Costan G, Gagnon P, Chan HM (2000) Aquat Toxicol 50:51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Solé M, Livingstone DR (2005) Comp Biochem Physiol 141C:20–31

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rewitz KF, Styrishave B, Løbner-Olesen A, Andersen O (2006) Comp Biochem Physiol 143:363–381

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ferrari B, Mons R, Vollat B, Fraysse B, Paxéus N, Lo Giudice R, Pollio A, Garric J (2004) Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1344–1354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Cleuvers M (2005) Chemosphere 59:199–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim Y, Choi K, Jung J, Park S, Kim P-G, Park J (2007) Environ Int 33:370–375.27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kühn R, Pattard M, Pernak K-D, Winter A (1989) Water Res 23:495–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jones OAH, Voulvoulis N, Lester JN (2004) Crit Rev Toxicol 34:335–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Carlsson C, Johansson A-K, Alvan G, Bergman K, Kühler T (2006) Sci Total Environ 364:67–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Morley NJ (2009) Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 27:161–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Gagné F, Blaise C, Hellou J (2004) Comp Biochem Physiol 138C:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gagné F, Blaise C, Fournier M, Hansen PD (2006) Comp Biochem Physiol 143C:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  54. Quinn B, Gagné F, Blaise C (2009) Sci Total Environ 407:1072–1079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research was conducted thanks to a mobility grant to M. Solé from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (ref. PR2008–0210).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Montserrat Solé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solé, M., Shaw, J.P., Frickers, P.E. et al. Effects on feeding rate and biomarker responses of marine mussels experimentally exposed to propranolol and acetaminophen. Anal Bioanal Chem 396, 649–656 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3182-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3182-1

Keywords

Navigation