Skip to main content
Log in

Traceability of sulfonamide antibiotic treatment by immunochemical analysis of farm animal hair samples

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of hair to trace use of unauthorized substances, therapeutic agents, or their misuse is becoming very attractive since residues can be detected for a long time after treatment. For this purpose, an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been evaluated for its capability to trace sulfonamide antibiotic treatment by analyzing cattle and pig hair samples. Pigmented and nonpigmented hair samples from control and sulfamethazine (SMZ)-treated pigs and calves were collected, extracted under different alkaline conditions, and analyzed by ELISA after just diluting the extracts with the assay buffer. Data analysis following the European recommendations for screening methods demonstrates that the ELISA can detect SMZ in hair samples with a limit of detection (90% of the zero dose (IC90)) between 30 and 75 ng g−1. The same samples have been analyzed by HPLC after a dual solid-phase extraction. The ELISA results matched very well those obtained by the chromatographic method, demonstrating that the immunochemical method can be used as a screening tool to trace animal treatments. Between the benefits of this method are the possibility to directly analyze hair extracts with sufficient detectability and its high-throughput capability. Preliminary validation data are reported using an experimental approach inspired on the Commission Decision 2002/657/EC criteria for screening methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cromwell GL (2002) Anim Biotechnol 13:7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaskins HR, Collier CT, Anderson DB (2002) Anim Biotechnol 13:29–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunnett M, Lees P (2004) Chromatographia 59:S69–S78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gratacos-Cubarsi M, Castellari M, Garcia-Regueiro JA (2006) J Chromatogr B 832:121–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stolker AAM, Brinkman UAT (2005) J Chromatogr 1067:15–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stolker AAM, Zuidema T, Nielen MWF, Nielen MWF (2007) TrAC Trends Anal Chem 26:967–979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaillard Y, Pépin G (1999) J Chromatogr B, Biomed Sci Appl 733:231–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tagliaro F, Smith FP, De Battisti Z, Manetto G, Marigo M (1997) J Chromatogr B, Biomed Sci Appl 689:261–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Font H, Adrian J, Galve R, Esevez MC, Castellari M, Gratacos-Cubarsi M, Sanchez-Baeza F, Marcot MP (2008) J Agric Food Chem 56:736–743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cirimele V, Etienne S, Villain M, Ludes B, Kintz P (2004) Forensic Sci Int 143:153–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper G (2005) Clin Chim Acta 355:S424–S424

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper G, Wilson L, Reid C, Baldwin D, Hand C, Spiehler V (2003) J Anal Toxicol 27:581–586

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper G, Wilson L, Reid C, Baldwin D, Hand C, Spiehler V (2005) J Anal Toxicol 29:678–681

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Han EY, Miller E, Lee J, Park Y, Lim M, Chung HS, Wylie FM, Oliver JS (2006) J Anal Toxicol 30:380–385

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lachenmeier K, Musshoff F, Madea B (2006) Forensic Sci Int 159:189–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller EI, Wylie FM, Oliver JS (2006) J Anal Toxicol 30:441–448

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moore C, Deitermann D, Lewis D, Feeley B, Niedbala RS (1999) J Forensic Sci 44:609–612

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pujol M-L, Cirimele V, Tritsch PJ, Villain M, Kintz P (2007) Forensic Sci Int 170:189–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Adrian J, Font HC, Diserens J-M, Sánchez-Baeza F, Marco MP (2009) J Agric Food Chem 57:385–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. European Commission (200) Commission Decision 2002/657/EC of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results Official Journal of the European Union, L221, 8–36 (17 August 2002)

  21. Gratacos-Cubarsi M (2007) Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1991–1998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Scortichini G, Annunziata L, Haouet MN, Benedetti F, Krusteva I, Galarini R (2005) Anal Chim Acta 535:43–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Paul V, Steinke K, Meyer HHD (2008) Anal Chim Acta 607:106–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dunnett M (2003) Res Vet Sci 75:89–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dunnett M, Richardson DW, Lees P (2004) Res Vet Sci 77:143–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Anielski P (2005) Anal Bioanal Chem 383:903–908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nielen MWF, Lasaroms JJP, Essers ML, Oosterink JE, Meijer T, Sanders MB, Zuidema T, Stolker AAM (2008) Anal Bioanal Chem 391:199–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (Contract numbers AGL2008-05578-C05-01/03 and NAN2004-09195-C04-04) and by the European Community (KBBE2007- 211326). The AMR group is a Grup de Recerca de la Generalitat de Catalunya and has support from the Departament d’Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la Informació la Generalitat de Catalunya (expedient 2005SGR 00207).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.-Pilar Marco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adrian, J., Gratacós-Cubarsí, M., Sánchez-Baeza, F. et al. Traceability of sulfonamide antibiotic treatment by immunochemical analysis of farm animal hair samples. Anal Bioanal Chem 395, 1009–1016 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-2878-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-2878-6

Keywords

Navigation