Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Monitoring the effect of chemicals on biological communities. The biofilm as an interface

  • Review
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biofilms can be regarded as early warning systems for detection of the effects of toxicants on aquatic systems, because they have been successfully used for detection of other environmental stressors (e.g. pH, salinity, organic pollution). A variety of methods is used for detection of the effects of toxicants by use of biofilms. The methods range from structurally-based to functionally-based, and from in vitro-based to systemic approaches. Physiological approaches may be appropriate for detection of acute effects. Among these methods, photosynthesis is more related to the effect of toxicants affecting algal communities, directly or indirectly, and extracellular enzyme activity is less specific. Selecting one or the other may depend on the suspected direct effect of the toxicant. Integrated studies have revealed the relevance of toxicants to top-down or bottom-up regulation of the biofilm community. Persistent or chronic effects should affect other biofilm indicators, for example growth or biomass-related factors (e.g. chlorophyll), or community composition. Among these, community composition might better reflect the effects of the toxicant(s), because this may cause a shift from a sensitive to a progressively tolerant community. Community composition-based approaches do not usually adequately reflect cause–effect relationships and require complementary analysis of properties affected in the short-term, for example physiological properties. The current array of methods available must be wisely combined to disentangle the effects of chemicals on biofilms, and whether these effects are transient or persistent, to successfully translate the chemical action of toxicants into the effect they might have on the river ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ivorra N, Hettelaar J, Kraak MHS, Sabater S, Admiraal W (2002) Environ Toxicol Chem 21:626–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Navarro E, Guasch H, Sabater S (2002) J Appl Phycol 14:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lock MA (1993) In: Ford TE (ed) Aquatic microbiology: an ecological approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 113–138

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allan JD (1995) Stream ecology. Structure and function of running waters. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 388

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flemming HC (1995) Water Sci Technol 32:27–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan D, Christiaen D, Shoshana A (1987) Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2953–2956

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevenson RJ (1996) In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology, freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press

  8. Navarro E, Guasch H, Sabater S (2001) J Appl Phycol 1–9

  9. Pérès F, Florin D, Groiller T, Feurtet-Mazel A, Coste M, Ribeyre F, Ricard M, Boudou A (1996) Environ Pollut 94:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rowan KS (1989) Photosynthetic pigments of algae. Cambridge University Press, pp 334

  11. Descy JP, Metens A (1996) J Plankt Res 18:1557–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pinckney J, Paerl HW, Fitzpatrick M (1995) Mar Ecol Prog Ser 123:207–216

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schreiber U, Gademann R, Bird P, Ralph PJ, Larkum AWD, Kuhl M (2002) J Phycol 38:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Grinten E, Janssen M, Simis SGH, Barranguet C, Admiraal W (2004) Freshwater Biol 49:369–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dorigo U, Leboulanger C (2001) J Appl Phycol 13:509–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dorigo U, Bourrain X, Berard A, Leboulanger C (2004) Sci Tot Environ 318:101–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ivorra N, Bremer S, Guasch H, Kraak MHS, Admiraal W (2000) Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1332–1339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Admiraal W, Blanck H, Buckert De Jong M, Guasch H, Ivorra N, Lehmann V, Nystrom BAH, Paulsson M, Sabater S (1999) Water Res 33:1989–1996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guasch H, Admiraal W, Sabater S (2003) Aquat Toxicol 64:165–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabater S, Admiraal W (2005) Azim ME, Verdegem MCJ, Van Dam AA, Beveridge MCM (eds). Periphyton: ecology, exploitation and management. Cabi Publishing, pp 159–177

  21. Samrakandi MM, Roques C, Michel G (1997) Can J Microbiol 3:751–758

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guasch H, Ivorra N, Lehmann V, Paulsson M, Real M, Sabater S (1998) J Appl Ecol 10:203–213

    Google Scholar 

  23. Descy JP, Coste M (1991) Verh Int Verein Limnol 24:2112–2116

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kelly MG, Whitton BA (1995) J Appl Phycol 7:433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sabater S (2000) J Appl Phycol 12:113–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lürling M, Beekman W (2002) Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1213–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmitt-Jansen M, Altenburger R (2005) Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2:539–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guasch H, Paulsson M, Sabater S (2002) J Phycol 38:241–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Blanck H, Wängberg S-A, Molander S (1988) In: Cairns J Jr, Pratt JR (eds) Functional testing of aquatic biota for estimating hazards of chemicals. ASTM STP 988, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, pp 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pérès F, Coste M, Ribeyre F, Ricard M, Boudou A (1997) J Appl Phycol 9:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Blanck H, Wangberg S (1991) Aquat Toxicol 21:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nyström B, Paulsson M, Almgren K, Blank H (2000) Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1324–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmitt-Jansen M, Altenburger R (2005) Environ Toxicol Chem 24:304–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Barranguet C, Van Den Ende FP, Rutgers M, Breure AM, Greijdanus M, Sinke JJ, Admiraal W (2003) Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1340–1349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Peterson HG, Boutin C, Martin PA, Freemark KE, Ruecker NJ, Moody MJ (1994) Aquat Toxicol 28:275–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Backhaus T, Arrhenius A, Blanck H (2004) Environ Sci Technol 39:6363–6370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Skrodenyte V (1998) Int Rev Hydrobiol 83:495–498

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vinter V, Smid F, Smrckova I (1987) Folia Microbiol 32:80–95

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cohen I, Bitan R, Nitzan Y (1991) Microbios 68:157–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chapell KR, Goulder R (1994) Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 52:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Paulsson M, Mansson V, Blanck H (2002) Aquat Toxicol 56:103–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kloeke FV, Geesey GG (1999) Microb Ecol 38:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dorn PB, Rodgers JH Jr, Gillespie WB Jr, Lizotte RE Jr, Dunn AW (1997) Environ Toxicol Chem 16:1634–1645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Boeije GM, Schowanek DR, Vanrolleghem PA (2000) Water Res 34:1479–1486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Takada H, Mutoh K, Tomita N, Miyadzu T, Ogura N (1994) Water Res 28:1953–1960

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lee DM, Guckert JB, Ventullo RM, Davidson DH, Belanger SE (1997) Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 36:288–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Muñoz I, Real M, Guasch H, Navarro E, Sabater S (2001) Aquat Toxicol 55:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sabater S, Navarro E, Guasch H (2002) J Appl Phycol 14:391–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lewis MA (1992) Aquat Toxicol 23:279–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kreutzweiser DP, Capell SS, Sousa BC (1995) Environ Toxicol Chem 14:1521–1527

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Paulsson M, Nystrom B, Blanck H (2000) Aquat Toxicol 47:243–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Gold C, Feurtet-Mazel A, Coste M, Boudou A (2003) Freshwater Biol 48:316–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Perrin CJ, Wilkes B, Richardson JS (1992) Environ Toxicol Chem 11:1513–1525

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Soldo D, Behra R (2000) Aquat Toxicol 47:181–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Genter RB, Cherri DS, Smith EP, Cairns J Jr (1987) Hydrobiologia 153:261–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Schneider J, Morin A, Pick FR (1995) Environ Toxicol Chem 14:1607–1613

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Belanger SE, Lee DM, Bowling JW, LeBlanc EM (2004) Environ Toxicol Chem 23:2202–2213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hill AR, Warwick J (1987) Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:1948–1956

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Forster PL (1982) Freshwater Biol 12:41–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lindstrom E, Rorslett B (1991) Verh Int Verein Limnol 24:2215–2219

    Google Scholar 

  61. Crossey MJ, La Point TW (1988) Hydrobiologia 162:109–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Hirst H, Juttner I, Ormerod SJ (2002) Freshwater Biol 47:1752–1765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Griffith MB, Hill BH, Herlihy AT, Kaufman PR (2002) J Phycol 38:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Blanck H, Admiraal W, Cleven RFMJ, Guasch H, van den Hoop MAGT, Ivorra N, Nyström B, Paulsson M, Petterson RP et al (2003) Environ Contam Toxicol 44:17–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Lehmann V, Tubbing GMJ, Admiraal W (1999) Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 36:384–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Altenburger R, Boedecker W, Faust M, Grimme LH (1990) Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 20:98–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Faust M, Altenburger R, Backhaus T, Boedecker W, Scholz M, Grimme LH (2000) J Environ Qual 29:1063–1068

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Yallop ML, Paterson DM, Wellsbury P (2000) Microbial Ecol 39:116–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Barranguet C, van Beusekom SAM, Veuger B, Neu TR, Manders EMM, Sinke JJ, Admiraal W (2004) Aquat Microb Ecol 34:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  70. Costerton JW, Geesey GG, Cheng KJ (1978) Scientific American 238:86–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Battin TJ, Kaplan LA, Newbold JD, Cheng XH, Hansen C (2003) Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5443–5452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Freeman C, Lock MA (1995) Limnol Oceanogr 40:273–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Bhaskar P, Bhosle NB (2006) Environ Int 32:191–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Wang W, Wang W, Zhang X, Wang D (2002) Water Res 36:551–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Sheng GP, Yu HQ, Yue ZB (2005) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:216–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Aloi JE (1990) Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:656–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Blanck H, Dahl B (1996) Aquat Toxicol 35:59–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Morin S, Vivas-Nogues M, Duong TT, Boudou A, Coste M, Delmas F (2006) Arch Hydrobiol, in press

  79. Geoffroy L, Frankart C, Eullaffroy P (2004) Environ Pollut 131:233–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Okamoto OK, Colepicolo P (1998) Comp Biochem Physiol 119:67–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Tripathi BN, Mehta SK, Amar A, Gaue JP (2006) Chemosphere 63:538–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Geoffroy L, Teisseire H, Couderchet M, Vernet V (2002) Pest Biochem Physiol 72:178–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Lawrence JR, Swerhone GDW, Wassenaar LI, Neu TR (2005) Can J Microbiol 51:655–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was funded by the Commission of the European Community (Modelkey, Contract-No. 511237 (GOCE)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, Universitat de Girona, Campus Montili, 17071, Girona, Spain

    Sergi Sabater, Helena Guasch, Marta Ricart, Anna Romaní & Gemma Vidal

  2. Department of Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology, UFZ Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-Halle, Permoserstr. 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany

    Christina Klünder & Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen

Authors
  1. Sergi Sabater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helena Guasch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marta Ricart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anna Romaní
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gemma Vidal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christina Klünder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergi Sabater.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabater, S., Guasch, H., Ricart, M. et al. Monitoring the effect of chemicals on biological communities. The biofilm as an interface. Anal Bioanal Chem 387, 1425–1434 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-1051-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-1051-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation