Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative determination of ginsenoside Rh2 in rat biosamples by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ginsenoside Rh2 is a “hot” natural compound with great potential as a new anti-cancer drug based on abundant pharmacological experiments. However, no systemic pharmacokinetic study of Rh2 was reported because current analysis methods could not fully meet the requirements. Thus, we developed a simple LC/MS method with highly improved sensitivities for the determination of Rh2 in rat plasma, bile, urine, feces and most tissues. The tissues and feces were firstly homogenized mechanically using buffer and methanol as the media, respectively. Plasma, bile, urine and tissue homogenates were extracted with diethyl ether for sample preparation. Feces homogenates were directly deproteinized with acetonitrile. The subsequent analysis procedures were performed on a Shimadzu LCMS2010A system (electrospray ionization single quadrupole mass analyzer), with an ODS column (150 mm × 2.0-mm i.d., 5 μm) plus a C18 guard column for separation and ammonium chloride (500 μmol) as mobile phase additive. The proportions of mobile phase were changed timely according to gradient programs. Chlorinated adducts of molecular ions [M + Cl] of Rh2 at m/z 657.35 and internal standard digitoxin at m/z 799.55 were monitored in selective ion monitoring mode of negative ions. The method was validated to be accurate, precise and rugged with good linearity in all matrices, according to the FDA guidelines. The lower limits of quantitation in rat plasma, urine and feces were 0.2, 0.2 and 20 ng/mL respectively. Stability studies were also performed, indicating that there were no stability-related problems in the analytical procedure of Rh2. The proposed method was successfully applied to the preclinical pharmacokinetic research of Rh2 in rats, including plasma kinetics, tissue distribution and excretion studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LC/ESI/MS:

liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

HPLC:

high-performance liquid chromatography

LLOQ:

lower limit of quantitation

LC/MS/MS:

liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

LOD:

limit of detection

IS:

internal standard

QC:

quality control

CDL:

curved desolvation line

DC:

direct current

RF:

radiation frequency

SIM:

selective ion monitoring

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

CV:

coefficient of variation

SPE:

solid-phase extraction

LLE:

liquid–liquid extraction

t 0 :

dead time

ME:

matrix effect

MRT:

mean residence time

T 1/2 :

elimination half life

AUC:

area under the concentration–time curve

References

  1. Kitagawa I, Yoshikawa M, Yoshihara M, Hayashi T, Taniyama T (1983) Yakugaku Zasshi 103:612–622

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Attele AS, Wu JA, Yuan CS (1999) Biochem Pharmacol 58:1685–1693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Park JA, Lee KY, Oh YJ, Kim KW, Lee SK (1997) Cancer Lett 121:73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim HE, Oh JH, Lee SK, Oh YJ (1999) Life Sci 65:PL33–PL40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ham YM, Chun KH, Choi JS, Kim DH, Lee SK (2003) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 304:358–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tatsuka M, Maeda M, Ota T (2001) Jpn J Cancer Res 92:1184–1189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee YN, Lee HY, Chung HY, Kim SI, Lee SK, Park BC, Kim KW (1996) Eur J Cancer 32A:1420–1428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakata H, Kikuchi Y, Tode T, Hirata J, Kita T, Ishii K, Kudoh K, Nagata I, Shinomiya N (1998) Jpn J Cancer Res 89:733–740

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fei XF, Wang BX, Tashiro S, Li TJ, Ma JS, Ikejima T (2002) Acta Pharmacol Sin 23:315–322

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng CC, Yang SM, Huang CY, Chen JC, Chang WM, Hsu SL (2005) Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 55:531–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuzzati N (2004) J Chromatogr B 812:119–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xie HT, Wang GJ, Sun JG, Tucker I, Zhao XC, Xie YY, Li H, Jiang XL, Wang R, Xu MJ, Wang W (2005) J Chromatogr B 818:167–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cai ZW, Qian TX, Ricky NS, Wong B, Jiang ZH (2003) Anal Chim Acta 492:283–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun JG, Wang GJ, Xie HT, Li H, Pan GY, Tucker I (2005) J Pharm Biomed Anal 38:126–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li K, Chen X, Xu J, Li X, Zhong D (2005) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19:813–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Xie HT, Wang GJ, Lv H, Wang R, Sun JG, Jiang XL, LiH, Wang W, Huang CR, Xu MJ (2005) Eur J Drug Metab Phamacokinet 30:63–67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Qian T, Cai Z, Wong RNS, Jiang ZH (2005) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19:3549–3554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee WK, Kao ST, Liu IM, Cheng JT (2006) Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 33:27–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. US Department of Health and Human Services (2001) Guidance for industry, bioanalytical method validation. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

  20. Ardrey RE (2003) Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry: an introduction. Wiley, England

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pang H, Wang HL, Fu L, Su CY (2001) Acta Pharma Sinica 36:170–174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang H, Zou H, Kong L, Zhang Y, Pang H, Su C, Liu G, Hui M, Fu L (1999) J Chromatogr B 731:403–405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu QF, Fang XL, Chen DF (2003) J Ethnopharmacol 84:187–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kebarle P, Tang L (1993) Anal Chem 65:972A–986A

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Buhrman D, Price P, Rudewicz P (1996) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 7:1099–1105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fu I, Woolf EJ, Matuszewski BK (1998) J Pharm Biomed Anal 18:347–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Matuszewski BK, Constanzer ML, Chavez-Eng CM (2003) Anal Chem 75:3019–3030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National High Technology Foundation of China (“863” Projects, No.2003AA2Z347A and No.2005AA2Z3C70), the fund of Jiangsu Key Lab of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (No.BM2001201), National Nature Science Fund (No. 30572228), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK 2005098). The great assistance from the group of post-graduates in the Key Lab of Drug Metabolism & Pharmacokinetics, China Pharmaceutical University is highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guang-Ji Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gu, Y., Wang, GJ., Sun, JG. et al. Quantitative determination of ginsenoside Rh2 in rat biosamples by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 386, 2043–2053 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0857-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0857-8

Keywords

Navigation