Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validation and qualification: the fitness for purpose of mass spectrometry-based analytical methods and analytical systems

  • Review
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The context of validation for mass spectrometry (MS)-based methods is critically analysed. The focus is on the fitness for purpose depending on the task of the method. Information is given on commonly accepted procedures for the implementation and acceptance of analytical methods as ‘confirmatory methods’ according to EU criteria, and strategies for measurement. Attention is paid to the problem of matrix effects in the case of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based procedures, since according to recent guidelines for bioanalytical method validations, there is a need to evaluate matrix effects during development and validation of LC-MS methods “to ensure that precision, selectivity and sensitivity will not be compromised”. Beneficial aspects of the qualification process to ensure the suitability of the MS analytical system are also evaluated and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO/IEC/EN 17025 (1999) General Requirements for the Competence of Calibration and Testing Laboratories, ISO, Geneva

  2. Chan C, Lam H, Lee YC, Zhang XM (2004) (eds) Analytical method validation and instrument performance verification. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods (1998) A laboratory guide to method validation and related topics, Eurachem Guide, 1st English edn. 1.0, LGC (Teddington) Ltd. http://www.eurachem.ul.pt

  4. Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R (2002) Pure Appl Chem 74:835–855

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. ILAC C3, WG6 (1998) Guide to the validation of test method, draft, ILAC, Rhodes, Australia

  6. ISO 5725, (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results, parts 1–4 and 6, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  7. AOAC International (1995) Quick and Easy! AOAC Official Methods Programme, Gaithersburg, MD

  8. CX/MAS 02/11, Codex Alimentarius Commission (2002) Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (FAO/WHO), Requirements for single-laboratory validation for Codex purposes. Agenda Item 8b of the 24th Session, Budapest, Hungary, 18–22 November 2002

  9. CX/MAS 02/12, Codex Alimentarius Commission, (2002) Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling (FAO/WHO), Validation of methods through the use of results from proficiency testing schemes, Agenda Item 8c on the 24th Session, Budapest, Hungary, 18–22 November 2002

  10. Taverniers I, De Loose M, Van Bockstaele E (2004) Trends Anal Chem 23:535–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Riediker S, Obrist H, Varga N, Stadler RH (2002) J Chromatogr A 966:15–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Careri M, Elviri L, Mangia A, Zagnoni I (2002) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 16: 1821–1826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mol HGJ, Van Dam RCJ, Steijger OM (2003) J Chromatogr A 1015:119–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ito Y, Goto T, Oka H, Matsumoto H, Takeba K (2004) J Chromatogr A 1042:107–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Calbiani F, Careri M, Elviri L, Mangia A, Zagnoni I (2004) J AOAC Int 87:107–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fernández-Alba AR (2005) (ed) Chromatographic mass spectrometric food analysis for trace determination of pesticide residues, Elsevier, Amsterdam

  17. Calbiani F, Careri M, Elviri L, Mangia A, Pistarà L, Zagnoni I (2004) J Chromatogr A 1042:123–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrer I, Heine CE, Thurman EM (2004) Anal Chem 76:1437–1444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Calbiani F, Careri M, Elviri L, Mangia A, Zagnoni I (2004) J Chromatogr A 1058:127–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barceló-Barrachina E, Moyano E, Galceran MT (2004) J Chromatogr A 1054:409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrer I, García-Reyes JF, Fernández-Alba A (2005) Trends Anal Chem 24:671–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrer I, Thurman EM (2003) (eds) Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry, MS/MS and time-of-flight MS: analysis of emerging contaminants. American Chemical Society Symposium Series 850, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC

  23. Čajka T, Hajšlová J (2004) J Chromatogr A 1058:251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gibbons RD, Henion JD, Kaiser MA, Lewis DL, Matusik JE, Sphon JA, Stephany RW, Trubey RK (1997) Report on 1996 ASMS Fall workshop: limits to confirmation, quantitation, and detection. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 8:1180–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bethem RA, Boyd RK (1998) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 9:643–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bethem R, Boison J, Gale J, Heller D, Lehotay S, Loo J, Musser S, Price P, Stein S (2003) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 14:528–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson M, Ramsey MH (1995) Analyst 120:261–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sphon JA (1978) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 61:1247–1252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li LYT, Campbell DA, Bennett PK, Henion J (1996) Anal Chem 68:3397–3404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. EC Decision (2002) EC Decision 2002/657 Off J Eur Commun L221/8

  31. Council Directive (1996) Council Directive 96/23/EC of 23 May 1996, Off J Eur Commun L125:10

  32. André F, De Wasch KKG, De Brabander HF, Impens SR, Stolker LAM, van Ginkel L, Stephany RW, Schilt R, Courtheyn D, Bonnaire Y, Fürst P, Gowik P, Kennedy G, Kuhn T, Moretain J-P, Sauer M (2001) Trends Anal Chem 20:435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Antignac J-P, Le Bizec B, Monteau F, André F (2003) Anal Chim Acta 483:325–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Reemtsma T (2003) J Chromatogr A 1000:477–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mallet CR, Lu Z, Mazzeo JR (2004) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 18:49–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kebarle P (2000) J Mass Spectrom 35:804–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. King R, Bonfiglio R, Fernandez-Metzler C, Miller-Stein C, Olah T (2000) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 11:942–950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. van Hout MWJ, Niederlander HAG, de Zeeuw RA, de Jong GJ (2003) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bonfiglio R, King R, Olah T, Merkle K (1999) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 13:1175–1185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Avery M (2003) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:197–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dams R, Huestis M, Lambert W, Murphy C (2003) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 14:1290–1294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Souverain S, Rudaz S, Veuthey J-L (2004) J Chromatogr A 1058:61–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Alder L, Lüderitz S, Lindtner K, Stan H-J (2004) J Chromatogr A 1058:67–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kloepfer A, Quintana JB, Reemtsma T (2005) J Chromatogr A 1067:153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Chin C, Zhang ZP, Karnes HT (2004) J Pharm Biomed Anal 35:1149–1167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Benijts T, Dams R, Lambert W, De Leenheer A (2004) J Chromatogr A 1029:153–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Matuszewski BK, Constanzer ML, Chavez-Eng CM (2003) Anal Chem 75:3019–3030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Matuszewski BK (2006) J Chromatogr B 830:293–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Stüber M, Reemtsma T (2004) Anal Bioanal Chem 378:910–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rogatsky E, Stein D (2005) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 16:1757–1759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Taylor PJ (2005) Clin Biochem 38:328–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Guidance for industry. Bioanalytical method validation. http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/guidance.htm, May 2001

  53. Equipment Validation and Qualification. http://www.labcompliance.com/equipment/faq.htm

  54. American Society of Mass Spectrometry (1997) Guidelines for writing an SOP for mass spectrometry prepared by the Measurements and Standards Committee of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Santa Fe, NM

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Chimica Generale ed Inorganica, Chimica Analitica, Chimica Fisica, Università di Parma, Consorzio Interuniversitario di Ricerca Metodologie Analitiche e Controllo Qualità (CIMACQ), Parco Area delle Scienze 17/A, 43100, Parma, Italy

    Maria Careri & Alessandro Mangia

Authors
  1. Maria Careri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessandro Mangia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Careri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Careri, M., Mangia, A. Validation and qualification: the fitness for purpose of mass spectrometry-based analytical methods and analytical systems. Anal Bioanal Chem 386, 38–45 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0581-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0581-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation