Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative proteomics

  • Trends
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Zhang H, Yan W, Aebersold R (2004) Chemical probes and tandem mass spectrometry: a strategy for the quantitative analysis of proteomes and subproteomes. Curr Opin Chem Biol 8(1):66–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baldwin MA (2004) Protein identification by mass spectrometry: issues to be considered. Mol Cell Proteom 3(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stein RC, Zvelebil MJ (2002) The application of 2D gel-based proteomics methods to the study of breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol 7(4):385–393

    Google Scholar 

  4. Washburn MP, Ulaszek RR, Yates JR III (2003) Reproducibility of quantitative proteomic analyses of complex biological mixtures by multidimensional protein identification technology. Anal Chem 75(19):5054–5061

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gygi SP et al (1999) Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol 17(10):994–999

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen KC et al (2003) Mass spectrometric analysis of protein mixtures at low levels using cleavable 13C-isotope-coded affinity tag and multidimensional chromatography. Mol Cell Proteom 2(5):299–314

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turecek F (2002) Mass spectrometry in coupling with affinity capture-release and isotope-coded affinity tags for quantitative protein analysis. J Mass Spectrom 37(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barnidge DR et al (2004) Evaluation of a cleavable stable isotope labeled synthetic peptide for absolute protein quantification using LC-MS/MS. J Proteome Res 3(3):658–661

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ong SE, Foster LJ, Mann M (2003) Mass spectrometric-based approaches in quantitative proteomics. Methods 29(2):124–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heller M et al (2003) Trypsin catalyzed 16O-to-18O exchange for comparative proteomics: tandem mass spectrometry comparison using MALDI-TOF, ESI-QTOF, and ESI-ion trap mass spectrometers. J Am Soc Mass Spectr 14(7):704–718

    Google Scholar 

  11. Page JS, Masselon CD, Smith RD (2004) FTICR mass spectrometry for qualitative and quantitative bioanalyses. Curr Opin Biotech 15(1):3–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wind M. et al (2001) Analysis of protein phosphorylation by capillary liquid chromatography coupled to element mass spectrometry with 31P detection and to electrospray mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 73(1):29–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wind M et al (2003) Sulfur as the key element for quantitative protein analysis by capillary liquid chromatography coupled to element mass spectrometry. Angew Chem Int Edit 42(29):3425–3427

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carr SA et al (2004) The need for guidelines in publication of peptide and protein identification data: working group on publication guidelines for peptide and protein identification data. Mol Cell Proteom 3(6):531–533

    Google Scholar 

  15. Foster LJ, de Hoog CL, Mann M (2003) Unbiased quantitative proteomics of lipid rafts reveals high specificity for signaling factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(10):5813–5818

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael W. Linscheid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Linscheid, M.W. Quantitative proteomics. Anal Bioanal Chem 381, 64–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2921-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2921-6

Keywords

Navigation