Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the results from an inter-laboratory comparison study of the determination of acrylamide in crispbread and butter cookies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analytical methods currently employed for determination of acrylamide (AA) in two carbohydrate-rich food samples, crispbread and butter cookies, obtained commercially, and native and spiked bread extract samples have been evaluated in a collaborative study. The objective of the study was to obtain information about the performance of the participating laboratories when analysing samples with an AA content close to the limit of quantification (LOQ) and at a higher AA level, and to investigate the influence of sample-preparation procedures on the results of the analysis. For this purpose an aqueous native extract of white bread crumb, a fortified extract, and AA standard solutions, the analyte content of which were not disclosed to the participants, were included in the study. A total of 62 laboratories, applying seven different measurement techniques and a broad spectrum of analyte extraction and sample-preparation procedures reported their analytical results. Because the measurement data were not normally distributed, they were evaluated by application of robust statistics. The relative performance of the laboratories was highlighted by calculation of z-scores. For the crispbread sample, especially, a large percentage of the calculated z-scores were outside the satisfactory range. From their distribution it became obvious that one of the analytical techniques might be biased, if not applied correctly. Consequently, the impact of the applied methods was examined in more detail. Information about the analytical technique, extraction solvent, quantity weighed, calibration method, clean-up, and the experience of the participating laboratories were extracted from the analytical protocols and transcribed into a data matrix which was evaluated by multifactor analysis of variance. The applied measurement technique seems to have a statistically significant influence on the analytical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hagmar L, Törnqvist M, Nordander C, Rosén J, Brunze M, Kautiainen A, Magnusson AL, Malmberg B, Aprea P, Granath F, Axmon A (2001) Scand J Environ Health 27:219–226

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (1994) IARC Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans: some industrial chemicals, Lyon, 60:389–433

  3. Johnson K, Gorzinski S, Bodner K, Campell R, Wolf C, Friedman M, Mast R (1986) Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 85:154–168

    Google Scholar 

  4. EEC Directive 92/39/EEC, 1992 L330:21–29

  5. EEC Directive 98/83/EC, 1998 L330:32–54

  6. FAO/WHO Acrylamide Infonet:http://www.acrylamide-food.org/index.htm

  7. European Commission: Acrylamide in food – database of activities in the EU:http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs//sfp/fcr/acrylamide/acryl_database_en.html

  8. Rosén J, Hellenäs KE (2002) Analyst 127:880–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tareke E, Rydberg P, Karlsson P, Eriksson S, Törnqvist M (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:4998–5006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Castle L (1993) J Agric Food Chem 41:1261–1263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Castle L, Campos M-J, Gilbert J (1991) J Sci Food Agric 54:549–555

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Biedermann M, Biedermann-Brem S, Noti A, Grob K, Egli P, Mändli H (2002) Mitteilungen Lebensm Hyg 93:638–652

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wenzl T, de la Calle MB, Anklam E (2003) Food Addit Contam 20:885–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de la Calle MB, Ostermann O, Wenzl T, Anklam E (2003) EUR 20766 EN, to be downloaded from:http://www.irmm.jrc.be/ffu/acrylamide.html

  15. Fauhl C, Klaffke H, Mathar W, Palvinskas R, Wittkowski R (2002) Acrylamide interlaboratory study 2002, to be downloaded from:http://www.bfr.bund.de/cms/detail.php?template=internet_de_index_js

  16. Clarke DB, Kelly J, Wilson LA (2002) J AOAC Int 85:1370–1373

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tareke E, Rydberg P, Karlsson P, Eriksson S, Törnqvist M (2000) Chem Res Toxicol 13:517–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nemoto S, Takatsuki S, Sasaki K, Maitani T (2002) J Food Hyg Soc Jpn 43:371–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Becalski A, Lau BPY, Lewis D, Seaman SW (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:802–808

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson M, Wood R (1993) J AOAC Int 76:926–940

    Google Scholar 

  21. Analytical Methods Committee (1989) Analyst 114:1693–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson M (2000) Analyst 125:385–386

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Horwitz W, Kamps LR, Boyer KW (1980) J AOAC 63:1344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jadwiszczak P (2003) Random Projects 2.0 LITE. Statistical software available from the web sitehttp://pjadw.tripod.com

  25. Good PI (1999) Resampling methods. A practical guide to data analysis. Birkhauser, Boston

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elke Anklam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wenzl, T., de la Calle, B., Gatermann, R. et al. Evaluation of the results from an inter-laboratory comparison study of the determination of acrylamide in crispbread and butter cookies. Anal Bioanal Chem 379, 449–457 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2591-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-004-2591-4

Keywords

Navigation