Skip to main content
Log in

A new method for optimizing a set of nonlinear parameters: application in total Hartree–Fock atomic energy calculations

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method for optimizing a set of numerical parameters is presented. This method does not depend on prior knowledge of the goal function and of its derivatives. Besides, it is robust and does not require any other method to achieve result near the global extreme (maximum/minimum) of the goal function. However, as the computational time spent by our method increases with the number of numerical parameters and with the size of each parameter to be optimized, in this work, it is applied together with the IGCHF method to construct accurate uncontracted basis sets to describe the ground states of some atoms. In these cases, the parameters to be optimized are the exponents of the Gaussian functions and the minimum total HF energy criterion is guaranteed by the variational principle. It is verified that the results calculated with the proposed new method are better than those obtained with the Monte Carlo and particle swarm methods, although the computational times spent in some cases by it are larger than those of the other two methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neto AC, Muniz EP, Centoducatte R, Jorge FE (2005) Gaussian basis sets for correlated wave functions. Hydrogen, helium, first- and second-row atoms. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 718:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Camiletti GG, Machado SF, Jorge FE (2008) Gaussian basis set of double zeta quality for atoms K through Kr: application in DFT calculations of molecular properties. J Comput Chem 29:2434–2444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ceolin GA, de Berrêdo RC, Jorge FE (2013) Gaussian basis sets of quadruple zeta quality for potassium through xenon: application in CCSD(T) atomic and molecular property calculations. Theor Chem Acc 132:1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jorge FE, Martins LSC, Franco ML (2016) All-electron double zeta basis sets for the lanthanides: application in atomic and molecular property calculations. Chem Phys Lett 643:84–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Campos CT, de Oliveira AZ, Ferreira IB, Jorge FE, Martins LSC (2017) Segmented all-electron Gaussian basis sets of double and triple zeta qualities for Fr, Ra, and Ac. Chem Phys Lett 675:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Martins LSC, Jorge FE, Franco ML, Ferreira IB (2016) All-electron Gaussian basis sets of double zeta quality for the actinides. J Chem Phys 145:244113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Powell MJD (1964) An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives. Comput J 7:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg DE, Richardson J (1987) Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on genetic algorithms on genetic algorithms and their application, pp 41–49

  11. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD Jr, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002) The particle swarm—explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 6:58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brent RP (1973) Algorithms for minimization without derivatives. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 195

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kennedy J, Eberhart, R (1995) In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks vol 4, pp 1942–1948

  15. Hill DL, Wheeler JA (1953) Nuclear constitution and the interpretation of fission phenomena. Phys Rev 89:1102–1145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Griffin JJ, Wheeler JA (1957) Collective motions in nuclei by the method of generator coordinates. Phys Rev 108:311–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohallem JR, Dreizler RM, Trsic M (1986) A Griffin–Hill–Wheeler version of the Hartree–Fock equations. Int J Quantum Chem Symp 20:45–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. De Castro EVR, Jorge FE, Pinheiro JC (1999) Accurate Gaussian basis sets for second-row atoms and ions generated with the improved generator coordinate Hartree–Fock method. Chem Phys 243:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chattopadhyay P, Dreizler R, Trsic M, Fink M (1978) Illustration of the generator coordinate method in terms of model problems. Z Phys A Atoms Nucl 285:7–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Galetti D, de Toledo Piza A (1978) Numerical treatment of the Griffin–Hill–Wheeler equation. Phys Rev C 17:774–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Toulouse J, Umrigar CJ (2007) Optimization of quantum Monte Carlo wave functions by energy minimization. J Chem Phys 126:084102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mendes Arruda P, Canal Neto A, Martins Campos MC, Coelho da Cruz HR, Santos FA (2015) Molecule-adapted basis sets optimized with a quantum Monte Carlo method. Int J Quantum Chem 115:77–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cerný V, Optim J (1985) Thermodynamical approach to the traveling salesman problem: an efficient simulation algorithm. Theory Appl 45:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  24. Triki E, Collette Y, Siarry P (2005) A theoretical study on the behavior of simulated annealing leading to a new cooling schedule. Eur J Oper Res 166:77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Boussaïd I, Lepagnot J, Siarry P (2013) A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Inf Sci 237:82–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. De Andrade M, Nascimento M, Mundim K, Sobrinho A, Malbouisson L (2008) Atomic basis sets optimization using the generalized simulated annealing approach: new basis sets for the first row elements. Int J Quantum Chem 108:2486–2498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bunge CF, Barrientos JA, Bunge AV, Cogordan JA (1992) Hartree–Fock and Roothaan–Hartree–Fock energies for the ground states of He through Xe. Phys Rev A 46:3691–3696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Koga T, Watanabe S, Thakkar AJ (1995) Numerical Hartree–Fock results for atoms Cs through Lr. Int J Quantum Chem 54:261–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support of Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo (Brazilian Agencies).

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco E. Jorge.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jorge, F.E., Canal Neto, A. A new method for optimizing a set of nonlinear parameters: application in total Hartree–Fock atomic energy calculations. Theor Chem Acc 139, 76 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-020-02593-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-020-02593-0

Keywords

Navigation