Abstract
Anxiolytic drugs generally produce anticonflict effects in both pigeons and rats, although relatively few anxiolytics have been examined in the pigeon and the procedure has not been as completely validated as the rat model. In this study, we examined the antipunishment effects of a variety of benzodiazepine agonists in pigeons and compared the relationship between their potencies to engender anxiolytic-like effects and their clinical doses in humans. In pigeons whose responding was maintained under a multiple FR30food:FR30food+shock schedule, the benzodiazepine agonists diazepam, flunitrazepam, alprazolam, chlordiazepoxide, lorazepam, flurazepam, bromazepam, medazepam, and clorazepate produced dose-related increases in punished responding, and, with the exception of medazepam, decreased unpunished responding at higher doses. Potencies calculated from the percentage of pigeons showing significant increases in punished responding ranged from 0.081 to 11 mg/kg, and these potencies were invariably lower than those for decreases in unpunished responding by factors ranging from 2.2 to more than 14. The comparison of relative potencies of benzodiazepine receptor agonists in pigeons and humans revealed a high positive correlation (0.90, P<0.005), thus demonstrating the predictive validity of this preclinical animal model for anxiolytic benzodiazepines. The results agree with previous findings of robust anticonflict effects of benzodiazepine receptor agonists and extend further the pharmacological characterization to compounds that have not been examined previously in pigeons.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 22 May 1998 / Final version: 4 August 1998
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kleven, M., Koek, W. Effects of benzodiazepine agonists on punished responding in pigeons and their relationship with clinical doses in humans. Psychopharmacology 141, 206–212 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050826
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050826