Skip to main content
Log in

The α4β2 agonist SIB 1765F, but not the α7 agonist AR-R 17779, cross-sensitises to the psychostimulant effects of nicotine

  • Rapid Communication
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Rationale: Repeated administration of nicotine leads to an augmentation of its locomotor activating effects. Although studies have begun to identify the nicotinic receptor subtype(s) mediating the psychostimulant properties of nicotine, none as yet have investigated the subtypes which contribute to the process of sensitisation. Objectives: We therefore investigated cross-sensitisation to nicotine using subjects chronically treated with two nicotine subtype-selective agonists in an attempt to identify the relative contribution of each to the sensitisation process. Methods: Rats received ten daily injections of either vehicle, nicotine (0.4 mg/kg), the α7-agonist AR-R 17779 (20 mg/kg), or the α4β2-agonist SIB 1765F (3 mg/kg), and their subsequent locomotor response to acute challenge with each of these compounds was assessed. Results: Chronic administration of both nicotine and SIB 1765F, but not AR-R 17779, resulted in an enhanced locomotor response to acute challenge with either nicotine or SIB 1765F but not AR-R 17779. Conclusions: These data support a role for the α4β2 receptor in both the initiation and expression of sensitisation to the psychomotor stimulant effects of nicotine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grottick, A., Wyler, R. & Higgins, G. The α4β2 agonist SIB 1765F, but not the α7 agonist AR-R 17779, cross-sensitises to the psychostimulant effects of nicotine. Psychopharmacology 150, 233–236 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130000444

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130000444

Navigation