Skip to main content
Log in

2-AG promotes the expression of conditioned fear via cannabinoid receptor type 1 on GABAergic neurons

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

The contribution of two major endocannabinoids, 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and anandamide (AEA), in the regulation of fear expression is still unknown.

Objectives

We analyzed the role of different players of the endocannabinoid system on the expression of a strong auditory-cued fear memory in male mice by pharmacological means.

Results

The cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) antagonist SR141716 (3 mg/kg) caused an increase in conditioned freezing upon repeated tone presentation on three consecutive days. The cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2) antagonist AM630 (3 mg/kg), in contrast, had opposite effects during the first tone presentation, with no effects of the transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor type 1 (TRPV1) antagonist SB366791 (1 and 3 mg/kg). Administration of the CB2 agonist JWH133 (3 mg/kg) failed to affect the acute freezing response, whereas the CB1 agonist CP55,940 (50 μg/kg) augmented it. The endocannabinoid uptake inhibitor AM404 (3 mg/kg), but not VDM11 (3 mg/kg), reduced the acute freezing response. Its co-administration with SR141716 or SB366791 confirmed an involvement of CB1 and TRPV1. AEA degradation inhibition by URB597 (1 mg/kg) decreased, while 2-AG degradation inhibition by JZL184 (4 and 8 mg/kg) increased freezing response. As revealed in conditional CB1-deficient mutants, CB1 on cortical glutamatergic neurons alleviates whereas CB1 on GABAergic neurons slightly enhances fear expression. Moreover, 2-AG fear-promoting effects depended on CB1 signaling in GABAergic neurons, while an involvement of glutamatergic neurons remained inconclusive due to the high freezing shown by vehicle-treated Glu-CB1-KO.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that increased AEA levels mediate acute fear relief, whereas increased 2-AG levels promote the expression of conditioned fear primarily via CB1 on GABAergic neurons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Redes temáticas de Investigación Cooperativa en salud (ISCIII y FEDER): Red de trastornos adictivos RD06/0001/1013 and RD2012/0028/0021; GRUPOS UCM-BSCH (GRUPO UCM 951579); Plan Nacional sobre Drogas: SAS/1250/2009. ALB received a travel grant from Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds. ALBT is supported by a CNPq scholarship (process 290008/2009-3). In addition, this work was supported by the project “CEITEC—Central European Institute of Technology” (CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068) from the European Regional Development Fund (to VM).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carsten T. Wotjak.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplemental Figure 1

Consequences of pharmacological treatment on locomotor activity in C57BL/6N mice. The animals were treated in the same manner as done before re-exposure to the tone at d1-d3 (cf. Fig. 1 + 2), 16 days after fear conditioning. The following behavioral measures were scored during the subsequent 15-min exposure to the activity chambers and analyzed in 3-min bins: (i) movement time (left), distance (middle) and number of vertical explorations (rearings, right). I > II – significant group differences (p < 0.05, ANOVA, followed by Newman-Keuls post-hoc test); * p < 0.05 (significant group x time interval interaction, followed by Newman-Keuls test). (PDF 65 kb)

Supplemental Figure 2

Consequences of JZL184 on locomotor activity in GABA-CB1-KO. GABA-CB1-KO and WT controls were treated with JZL184 (4 mg/kg) or vehicle in the same manner as done before re-exposure to the tone at d1-d3 (cf. Fig. 4A-C), 16 days after fear conditioning. The following behavioral measures were scored during the subsequent 15-min exposure to the activity chambers and analyzed in 3-min bins: (i) movement time (left), distance (middle) and number of vertical explorations (rearings, right). (PDF 32 kb)

Suppl. Tab. 01

(RTF 93 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Llorente-Berzal, A., Terzian, A.L.B., di Marzo, V. et al. 2-AG promotes the expression of conditioned fear via cannabinoid receptor type 1 on GABAergic neurons. Psychopharmacology 232, 2811–2825 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-3917-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-3917-y

Keywords

Navigation