Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differences in delay discounting between smokers and nonsmokers remain when both rewards are delayed

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

When offered a choice between a small monetary reward available immediately (SmallNow) versus a larger reward available after a delay (LargeLater), smokers select the SmallNow alternative more than nonsmokers. That is, smokers discount the value of the LargeLater reward more than nonsmokers.

Objectives

To investigate whether this group difference was due to smokers overweighting the value of rewards available immediately compared with nonsmokers, we examined whether the group difference was also seen when both alternatives were delayed, i.e., when choosing between a SmallSoon reward and a LargeLater reward.

Methods

In Experiment 1, smokers and nonsmokers completed a task including SmallNow versus LargeLater choices and SmallSoon versus LargeLater choices. In Experiment 2, smokers and nonsmokers completed the same task but with hypothetical choices.

Results

Analyses using hyperbolic and double exponential (βδ) models replicate prior findings that smokers discount the LargeLater reward more than nonsmokers when the smaller reward is available immediately. The smoker–nonsmoker difference was also seen when the smaller reward was slightly delayed, though this effect was primarily driven by heightened discounting in male smokers. However, for potentially real rewards only, this smoker–nonsmoker difference was significantly reduced when the smaller reward was delayed.

Conclusions

The smoker–nonsmoker difference in discounting is not confined to situations involving immediate rewards. Differences associated with potentially real versus hypothetical rewards and gender underscore the complexity of the smoking–delay discounting relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder, revised 4th edn. Author, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (2002) Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Author, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker F, Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2003) Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: Similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. J Abnorm Psychol 112:382–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, Odum AL, Madden GJ (1999) Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146:447–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, Pitcock JA, Yi R, Angtuaco EJ (2009) Congruence of BOLD response across intertemporal choice conditions: Fictive and real money gains and losses. J Neurosci 29:8839–8846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, Yi R, Mueller ET, Jones BA, Christensen DR (2010) The behavioral economics of drug dependence: Towards the consilience of economics and behavioral neuroscience. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 3:319–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, Yi R, Landes RD, Hill PF, Baxter C (2011) Remember the future: Working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biol Psychiatry 69:260–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhri N, Caggiula AR, Donny EC, Booth S, Gharib M, Craven L et al (2006) Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine. Psychopharmacology 189:27–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger CR (1987) A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. A proposal. Arch Gen Psychiatry 44:573–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dallery J, Raiff BR (2007) Delay discounting predicts cigarette smoking in a laboratory model of abstinence reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 190:485–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis LR (1994) SCL-90-R: administration, scoring, and procedures manual, 3rd edn. National Computer Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinn WM, Aycicegi A, Harris CL (2004) Cigarette smoking in a student sample: Neurocognitive and clinical correlates. Addict Behav 29:107–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donny EC, Chaudhri N, Caggiula AR, Evans-Martin FF, Booth S, Gharib MA et al (2003) Operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats is enhanced by noncontingent nicotine: Implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 169:68–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein LH, Richards JB, Saad FG, Paluch RA, Roemmich JN, Lerman C (2003) Comparison between two measures of delay discounting in smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 11:131–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field M, Santarcangelo M, Sumnall H, Goudie A, Cole J (2006) Delay discounting and the behavioural economics of cigarette purchases in smokers: The effects of nicotine deprivation. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 186:255–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Figner B, Knoch D, Johnson EJ, Krosch AR, Lisanby SH, Fehr E et al (2010) Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci 13:538–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green L, Myerson J, Macaux EW (2005) Temporal discounting when the choice is between two delayed rewards. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:1121–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO (1991) The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 86:1119–1127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman GM, Gibb S (2006) Delay discounting in college cigarette chippers. Behav Pharmacol 17:660–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2002) Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. J Exp Anal Behav 77:129–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Bickel WK (2008) An algorithm for identifying nonsystematic data in delay discounting research. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 16:264–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MW, Bickel WK, Baker F (2007) Moderate drug use and delay discounting: A comparison of heavy, light, and never smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15:187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones BA, Landes RD, Yi R, Bickel WK (2009) Temporal horizon: Modulation by smoking status and gender. Drug Alcohol Depend 104(Suppl 1):S87–S93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kable JW, Glimcher PW (2010) An “as soon as possible” effect in human intertemporal decision making: Behavioral evidence and neural mechanisms. J of Neurophysiology 103:2513–2531

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollins SH (2003) Delay discounting is associated with substance use in college students. Addict Behav 28:1167–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q J Econ 112:443–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton-Craddock A, Nixon SJ, Tivis R (2003) Cognitive efficiency in stimulant abusers with and without alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27:457–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madden GJ, Begotka AM, Raiff BR, Kastern LL (2003) Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 11:139–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madden GJ, Raiff BR, Lagorio CH, Begotka AM, Mueller AM, Hehli DJ et al (2004) Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 12:251–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur JE (1987) An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In: Commons ML, Mazur JE, Nevin JA, Rachlin H (eds) The effect of delay and of intervening event on reinforcement value. Quantitative analyses of behavior, vol 5. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure EB, Ericson KM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD (2007) Time discounting for primary rewards. J Neurosci 27:5796–5804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD (2004) Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306:503–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SH (1999) Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146:455–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SH (2003) Discounting the value of commodities according to different types of cost. In: Heather N, Vuchinich RE (eds) Choice, behavioral economics and addiction: Theory, evidence and applications. Elsevier, New York, pp 339–357

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SH (2004) Effects of short-term nicotine deprivation on decision-making: Delay, uncertainty and effort discounting. Nicotine Tob Res 6:819–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney ME, Odlaug BL, Kim SW, Grant JE (2011) Cigarette smoking status in pathological gamblers: Association with impulsivity and cognitive flexibility. Drug Alcohol Depend 117:74–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesic J, Rusted J, Duka T, Jackson A (2011) Degree of dependence influences the effect of smoking on cognitive flexibility. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 98:376–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odum AL, Madden GJ, Bickel WK (2002) Discounting of delayed health gains and losses by current, never- and ex-smokers of cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res 4:295–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmura Y, Takahashi T, Kitamura N (2005) Discounting delayed and probabilistic monetary gains and losses by smokers of cigarettes. Psychopharmacology 182:508–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES (1995) Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol 51:768–774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petry NM, Kirby KN, Kranzler HR (2002) Effects of gender and family history of alcohol dependence on a behavioral task of impulsivity in healthy subjects. J Stud Alcohol 63:83–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds B (2006) A review of delay-discounting research with humans: Relations to drug use and gambling. Behav Pharmacol 17:651–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds B, Karraker K, Horn K, Richards JB (2003) Delay and probability discounting as related to different stages of adolescent smoking and non-smoking. Behav Proc 64:333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds B, Richards JB, Horn K, Karraker K (2004) Delay discounting and probability discounting as related to cigarette smoking status in adults. Behav Proc 65:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds B, Patak M, Shroff P, Penfold RB, Melanko DAM (2007) Laboratory and self-report assessments of impulsive behavior in adolescent daily smokers and nonsmokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15:264–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheres A, Sumiya M, Thoeny AL (2010) Studying the relation between temporal reward discounting tasks used in populations with ADHD: A factor analysis. Int J Methods Psychol 19:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Selzer ML (1971) The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: The quest for a new diagnostic instrument. Am J Psychiatry 127:89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi R, Mitchell SH, Bickel WK (2010) Delay discounting and substance abuse. In: Madden GJ, Bickel WK (eds) Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 191–212

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon JH, Higgins ST, Heil SH, Sugarbaker RJ, Thomas CS, Badger GJ (2007) Delay discounting predicts postpartum relapse to cigarette smoking among pregnant women. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15:176–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zachary RA (1991) Shipley institute of living scale: Revised manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Kranzler HR, Poling J, Gelernter J (2010) Variation in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene cluster CHRNA5–CHRNA3–CHRNB4 and its interaction with recent tobacco use influence cognitive flexibility. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:2211–2224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman M, Eysenck SBG, Eysenck HJ (1978) Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age and sex comparisons. J Consult Clin Psychol 46:139–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by R01 DA015543 (SHM) and R03 DA024195 (SHM). The authors report no conflicts of interest and did not receive funds from a commercial sponsor. The authors would like to thank Dr. Sam McClure for providing the MatLab script used to derive the β and δ values for the double exponential model, Dr. Rick Bevins for helpful discussion about the effects of nicotine and Stacy Legg for assistance conducting the experimental visits. SHM was primarily responsible for study design, and shared responsibility for data interpretation and manuscript writing with VBW. VBW conducted the experimental procedures and performed the data analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanne H. Mitchell.

Appendix 1 Instructions received by participants

Appendix 1 Instructions received by participants

Experiment 1

This task has 210 questions. For each question, you can choose between two options by clicking on it using the computer mouse. You can change your selection as often as you like and there is no right or wrong answer — we are interested in your personal preferences. Once you have finally decided which option you prefer you can register your preference and go on to the next question by clicking on the “next question” box.

You will make choices between two amounts of money. One or both of the amounts of money will be available after a delay.

Remember, at the end of the task, one of the questions that you answered will be chosen at random. You should answer all of the questions on the task honestly, because you will actually receive whatever you chose on that question. If you chose “money now” you will receive that amount of money at the end of the task and if you chose “money later” you will actually have to wait before receiving the money.

Please try the demonstration below. When you are ready to begin the task, click on the “begin task” box.

Experiment 2

This task has 210 questions. For each question, you can choose between two options by clicking on it using the computer mouse. You can change your selection as often as you like and there is no right or wrong answer — we are interested in your personal preferences. Once you have finally decided which option you prefer, you can register your preference and go on to the next question by clicking on the “next question” box.

You will make choices between two amounts of money. One or both of the amounts of money will be available after a delay. Imagine that the choices you are making are real — that if you choose “money now” you would receive that amount of money at the end of the task and that if you choose “money later” that you would actually have to wait before receiving the money.

Please try the demonstration below. When you are ready to begin the task, click on the “begin task” box.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell, S.H., Wilson, V.B. Differences in delay discounting between smokers and nonsmokers remain when both rewards are delayed. Psychopharmacology 219, 549–562 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2521-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2521-z

Keywords

Navigation