Abstract
Rationale
Cross-sectional research demonstrates that heavy drinking is associated with elevated impulsivity, including disinhibition. However, causal effects of disinhibition on drinking behaviour are not well established.
Objective
To experimentally manipulate disinhibited versus restrained mental sets before exploring their impact on alcohol-seeking behaviour and to investigate if any effects of the manipulation occurred independently of arousal, mood, and craving.
Methods
The study utilized a between-subjects design in which participants were randomly allocated to experimental groups. Social drinkers (N = 90) attended the laboratory for a single session where they initially completed a stop-signal task. Different mental sets were induced by emphasising either the importance of cautious responding and successful inhibition (Restraint group), the importance of rapid responding (Disinhibition group), or the equal importance of rapid responding and successful inhibition (Control group). Heart rate, blood pressure, and subjective mood were assessed before participants completed a bogus taste test procedure.
Results
The Restraint group consumed less beer than the Disinhibition and Control groups, which did not differ from each other. There were no group differences in heart rate, blood pressure, or self-reported mood after the manipulation. Across the whole sample, cautious responding during the stop-signal task (slower reaction time to ‘Go’ cues, fewer inhibition errors) was associated with reduced beer consumption.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that temporary fluctuations in disinhibited/restrained states may play a causal role in drinking behaviour.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Band G, Van Der Molen M, Logan G (2003) Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychol 112:105–142
Baumeister RF (2003) Ego depletion and self-regulation failure: a resource model of self-control. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27:281–284
Chamberlain S, Hampshire A, Müller U, Rubia K, del Campo N, Craig K, Regenthal R, Suckling J, Roiser J, Grant J (2009) Atomoxetine modulates right inferior frontal activation during inhibitory control: a pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry 65:550–555
Collins R, Lapp W (1992) The temptation and restraint inventory for measuring drinking restraint. Br J Addict 87:625–633
Dawe S, Loxton N (2004) The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28:343–351
de Wit H (2009) Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol 14:22–31
Dick D, Smith G, Olausson P, Mitchell S, Leeman R, O'Malley S, Sher K (2010) Understanding the construct of impulsivity and its relationship to alcohol use disorders. Addict Biol 15:217–226
Fernie G, Cole J, Goudie A, Field M (2010) Risk-taking but not response inhibition or delay discounting predict alcohol consumption in social drinkers. Drug Alcohol Depend 112:54–61
Field M, Eastwood B (2005) Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology 183:350–357
Field M, Duka T, Eastwood B, Child R, Santarcangelo M, Gayton M (2007) Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: do the effects generalise? Psychopharmacology 192:593–608
Gauggel S, Heusinger A, Forkmann T, Boecker M, Lindenmeyer J, Miles Cox W, Staedtgen M (2010) Effects of alcohol cue exposure on response inhibition in detoxified alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 34:1584–1589
Goldstein R, Volkow N (2002) Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry 159:1642–1652
Goudriaan A, Oosterlaan J, de Beurs E, van den Brink W (2006) Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction 101:534–547
Guerrieri R, Nederkoorn C, Schrooten M, Martijn C, Jansen A (2009) Inducing impulsivity leads high and low restrained eaters into overeating, whereas current dieters stick to their diet. Appetite 53:93–100
Hagger MS, Wood C, Stiff C, Chatzisarantis NLD (2010) Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 136:495–525
Houben K, Nederkoorn C, Wiers RW, Jansen A (2011) Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition. Drug Alcohol Depend (in press)
Jentsch J, Taylor J (1999) Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse: implications for the control of behavior by reward-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology 146:373–390
Jones A, Guerrieri R, Fernie G, Cole J, Goudie A, Field M (2011) The effects of priming restrained versus disinhibited behaviour on alcohol-seeking in social drinkers. Drug Alcohol Depend 113:55–61
Leotti LA, Wager TD (2010) Motivational influences on response inhibition measures. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36:430–447
Litt M, Cooney N, Kadden Larry R (1990) Reactivity to alcohol cues and induced moods in alcoholics. Addict Behav 15:137–146
Logan G, Cowan W (1984) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol Rev 91:295–327
Logan G, Schachar R, Tannock R (1997) Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychol Sci 8:60–64
Marczinski C, Fillmore M (2003) Preresponse cues reduce the impairing effects of alcohol on the execution and suppression of responses. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 11:110–117
Mayer J, Gaschke Y (1988) The experience and meta-experience of mood. J Pers Soc Psychol 55:102–111
McEvoy P, Stritzke W, French D, Lang A, Ketterman R (2004) Comparison of three models of alcohol craving in young adults: a cross-validation. Addiction 99:482–497
Muraven M, Baumeister RF (2000) Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychol Bull 126:247–259
Muraven M, Slessareva E (2003) Mechanisms of self-control failure: motivation and limited resources. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29:894–906
Nederkoorn C, Baltus M, Guerrieri R, Wiers R (2009) Heavy drinking is associated with deficient response inhibition in women but not in men. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 93:331–336
Nigg J (1999) The ADHD response-inhibition deficit as measured by the stop task: replication with DSM-IV combined type, extension, and qualification. J Abnorm Child Psychol 27:393–402
Nigg J, Wong M, Martel M, Jester J, Puttler L, Glass J, Adams K, Fitzgerald H, Zucker R (2006) Poor response inhibition as a predictor of problem drinking and illicit drug use in adolescents at risk for alcoholism and other substance use disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45:468–475
Patton J, Stanford M, Barratt E (1995) Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol 51:768–774
Perry J, Carroll M (2008) The role of impulsive behavior in drug abuse. Psychopharmacology 200:1–26
Reynolds B, Ortengren A, Richards J, de Wit H (2006) Dimensions of impulsive behavior: personality and behavioral measures. Pers Individ Differ 40:305–315
Saunders J, Aasland O, Babor T, Fuente J, Grant M (1993) Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction 88:791–804
Slaats-Willemse D, Swaab-Barneveld H, De Sonneville L, Van Der Meulen E, Buitelaar J (2003) Deficient response inhibition as a cognitive endophenotype of ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42:1242–1248
Sobell LC, Sobell MB (1992) Timeline followback: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten RZ, Allen J (eds) Measuring alcohol consumption: psychosocial and biological methods. Humana Press, New Jersey, pp 41–72
Tiffany S (1990) A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychol Rev 97:147–168
Verdejo-García A, Lawrence A, Clark L (2008) Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:777–810
Wiers R, Bartholow B, van den Wildenberg E, Thush C, Engels R, Sher K, Grenard J, Ames S, Stacy A (2007) Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86:263–283
Wiers R, Rinck M, Kordts R, Houben K, Strack F (2010) Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction 105:279–287
Willner P, Field M, Pitts K, Reeve G (1998) Mood, cue and gender influences on motivation, craving and liking for alcohol in recreational drinkers. Behav Pharmacol 9:631–642
Wills T, Walker C, Mendoza D, Ainette M (2006) Behavioral and emotional self-control: relations to substance use in samples of middle and high school students. Psychol Addict Behav 20:265–278
Wingrove J, Bond A (1997) Impulsivity: a state as well as trait variable. Does mood awareness explain low correlations between trait and behavioural measures of impulsivity? Pers Individ Differ 22:333–339
Wong M, Nigg J, Zucker R, Puttler L, Fitzgerald H, Jester J, Glass J, Adams K (2006) Behavioral control and resiliency in the onset of alcohol and illicit drug use: a prospective study from preschool to adolescence. Child Dev 77:1016–1033
Wong M, Brower K, Nigg J, Zucker R (2010) Childhood sleep problems, response inhibition, and alcohol and drug outcomes in adolescence and young adulthood. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 34:1033–1044
Funding
Funded by a research grant from the Medical Research Council, reference GO601070, awarded to the last three authors.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOC 39 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, A., Cole, J., Goudie, A. et al. Priming a restrained mental set reduces alcohol-seeking independently of mood. Psychopharmacology 218, 557–565 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2338-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2338-9