Skip to main content
Log in

Disruption of opioid-induced placebo responses by activation of cholecystokinin type-2 receptors

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Placebos are known to induce analgesia through the activation of μ-opioid receptors in some circumstances, such as after morphine pre-conditioning, an effect that is blocked by opioid antagonists.

Objectives

On the basis of the anti-opioid action of cholecystokinin, here we tested whether the activation of the cholecystokinin type-2 receptors abolishes opioid-induced placebo responses.

Methods

The activation of the cholecystokinin type-2 receptors was performed by means of the agonist pentagastrin, and placebo responses were obtained after morphine pre-conditioning in an experimental human model of pain (tourniquet technique).

Results

Opioid-induced placebo responses were completely disrupted by pentagastrin administration. In addition, a high correlation between the response to morphine and the response to placebo was found, and this correlation was completely abolished by pentagastrin.

Conclusion

These results show that the cholecystokinin-2 receptor agonist, pentagastrin, has the same effect as the μ-opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone, on placebo analgesia induced by morphine pre-conditioning, which suggests that the balance between cholecystokinergic and opioidergic systems is crucial in placebo responsiveness in pain. These findings also suggest that cholecystokinin type-2 receptor hyperactivity might be present in placebo non-responders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amanzio M, Benedetti F (1999) Neuropharmacological dissection of placebo analgesia: expectation-activated opioid systems versus conditioning-activated specific subsystems. J Neurosci 19:484–494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andre J, Zeau B, Pohl M, Cesselin F, Benoliel JJ, Becker C (2005) Involvement of cholecystokininergic system in anxiety-induced hyperalgesia in male rats: behavioral and biochemilac studies. J Neurosci 25:7896–7904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti F (2008) Mechanisms of placebo and placebo-related effects across diseases and treatments. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 48:33–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti F, Amanzio M, Maggi G (1995) Potentiation of placebo analgesia by proglumide. Lancet 346:1231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti F, Amanzio M, Casadio C, Oliaro A, Maggi G (1997) Blockade of nocebo hyperalgesia by the cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide. Pain 71:135–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti F, Amanzio M, Vighetti S, Asteggiano G (2006) The biochemical and neuroendocrine bases of the hyperalgesic nocebo effect. J Neurosci 26:12014–12022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti F, Pollo A, Colloca L (2007) Opioid-mediated placebo responses boost pain endurance and physical performance—is it doping in sport competitions? J Neurosci 27:11934–11939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de la Fuente-Fernandez R, Ruth TJ, Sossi V, Schulzer M, Calne DB, Stoessl AJ (2001) Expectation and dopamine release: mechanisms of the placebo effect in Parkinson’s disease. Science 293:1164–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eippert F, Bingel U, Schoell ED, Yacubian J, Klinger R, Lorenz J, Büchel C (2009a) Activation of the opioidergic descending pain control system underlies placebo analgesia. Neuron 63:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eippert F, Finsterbusch J, Bingel U, Büchel C (2009b) Direct evidence for spinal cord involvement in placebo analgesia. Science 326:404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enck P, Benedetti F, Schedlowski M (2008) New insights into the placebo and nocebo responses. Neuron 59:195–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finniss DG, Kaptchuk TJ, Miller F, Benedetti F (2010) Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects. Lancet 375:686–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gospic K, Gunnarsson T, Fransson P, Ingvar M, Lindefors N, Petrovic P (2008) Emotional perception modulated by an opioid and a cholecystokinin agonist. Psychopharmacology 197:295–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J-Y, Wang J-Y, Luo F (2009) Dissection of placebo analgesia in mice: the conditions for activation of opioid and non-opioid systems. J Psychopharmacol (in press)

  • Hebb ALO, Poulin J-F, Roach SP, Zacharko RM, Drolet G (2005) Cholecystokinin and endogenous opioid peptides: interactive influence on pain, cognition, and emotion. Prog Neuro Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 29:1225–1238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JD, Gordon NC, Fields HL (1978) The mechanisms of placebo analgesia. Lancet 2:654–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovic P, Kalso E, Petersson KM, Ingvar M (2002) Placebo and opioid analgesia—imaging a shared neuronal network. Science 295:1737–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price DD, Finniss DG, Benedetti F (2008) A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought. Annu Rev Psychol 59:565–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott DJ, Stohler CS, Egnatuk CM, Wang H, Koeppe RA, Zubieta JK (2007) Individual differences in reward responding explain placebo-induced expectations and effects. Neuron 55:325–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott DJ, Stohler CS, Egnatuk CM, Wang H, Koeppe RA, Zubieta JK (2008) Placebo and nocebo effects are defined by opposite opioid and dopaminergic responses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65:1225–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wager TD, Billing JK, Smith EE, Sokolik A, Casey KL, Davidson RJ, Kosslyn KL, Rose RM, Cohen JD (2004) Placebo-induced changes in fMRI in the anticipation and experience of pain. Science 303:1162–1166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wager TD, Scott DJ, Zubieta JK (2007) Placebo effects on human μ-opioid activity during pain. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:11056–11061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zubieta JK, Bueller JA, Jackson LR, Scott DJ, Xu Y, Koeppe RA, Nichols TE, Stohler CS (2005) Placebo effects mediated by endogenous opioid activity on μ-opioid receptors. J Neurosci 25:7754–7762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Istituto San Paolo di Torino and the Regione Piemonte (Turin, Italy) and from the Volkswagen Foundation (Hannover, Germany). The experiments of the present study comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed (Italy).

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Benedetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benedetti, F., Amanzio, M. & Thoen, W. Disruption of opioid-induced placebo responses by activation of cholecystokinin type-2 receptors. Psychopharmacology 213, 791–797 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-2037-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-2037-y

Keywords

Navigation