Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cocaine self-administration reinforced on a progressive ratio schedule decreases with continuous d-amphetamine treatment in rats

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

To date, there is no medication specifically approved for cocaine addiction. Agonist medications are used clinically in the treatment of other addictions, which suggests that this method of drug therapy could potentially be successful in treating cocaine addiction as well.

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of extended d-amphetamine treatment on responding on a progressive ratio (PR) schedule reinforced by cocaine.

Materials and methods

Rats were trained to self-administer cocaine (0.19, 0.38, 0.75, or 1.5 mg/kg/injection) or food on a PR schedule. After stable baseline breakpoints (the number of reinforcers earned in one session) were established over 3 days, animals were implanted with osmotic mini-pumps that continuously delivered d-amphetamine (5 mg/kg/day) for a duration of either 7 or 14 days. Breakpoints were then determined during and/or after this treatment period.

Results

Rats demonstrated dose-dependent decreases in cocaine-reinforced responding over the d-amphetamine treatment period. Breakpoints for doses of 0.75 mg/kg/injection and below decreased significantly when compared to baseline and remained decreased for up to 14 days after mini-pump removal, whereas those for the highest dose of cocaine remained unchanged. Additionally, d-amphetamine treatment during a 14-day abstinence period from cocaine self-administration had no effect on breakpoints when tested the day after mini-pump removal.

Conclusions

These data suggest that the reduction in cocaine-reinforced responding after continuous d-amphetamine treatment cannot be accounted for by tolerance alone. Instead, the roles of learning and the interaction between cocaine and d-amphetamine must be considered and examined in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett AC, Miller JR, Dohrmann JM, Caine SB (2004) Effects of dopamine indirect agonists and selective D1-like and D2-like agonists and antagonists on cocaine self-administration and food maintained responding in rats. Neuropharmacology 47(Suppl 1):256–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ettenberg A (2004) Opponent process properties of self-administered cocaine. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:721–728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fiore MC (2000) US public health service clinical practice guideline: treating tobacco use and dependence. Respir Care 45:1200–1262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foltin RW, Evans SM (1999) The effects of d-amphetamine on intake of food and a sweet fluid containing cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 62:457–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glowa JR, Wojnicki FHE, Matecka D, Rice KC, Rothman RB (1995) Effects of dopamine reuptake inhibitors on food- and cocaine-maintained responding: II. Comparisons with other drugs and repeated administrations. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 3:232–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski J, Rhoades H, Schmitz J, Stotts A, Daruzska LA, Creson D, Moeller FG (2001) Dextroamphetamine for cocaine-dependence treatment: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol 21:522–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski J, Rhoades H, Stotts A, Cowan K, Kopecky C, Dougherty A, Moeller FG, Hassan S, Schmitz J (2004a) Agonist-like or antagonist-like treatment for cocaine dependence with methadone for heroin dependence: two double-blind randomized clinical trials. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:969–981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski J, Shearer J, Merrill J, Negus SS (2004b) Agonist-like, replacement pharmacotherapy for stimulant abuse and dependence. Addict Behav 29:1439–1464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jayanthi LD, Ramamoorthy S (2005) Regulation of monoamine transporters: influence of psychostimulants and therapeutic antidepressants. AAPS J 7:E728–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalivas PW, Stewart J (1991) Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity. Brain Res Rev 16:223–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karila L, Gorelick D, Weinstein A, Noble F, Benyamina A, Coscas S, Blecha L, Lowenstein W, Martinot JL, Reynaud M, Lepine JP (2008) New treatments for cocaine dependence: a focused review. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 11:425–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kreek MJ, Vocci FJ (2002) History and current status of opioid maintenance treatments: blending conference session. J Subst Abuse Treat 23:93–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li SM, Campbell BL, Katz JL (2006) Interactions of cocaine with dopamine uptake inhibitors or dopamine releasers in rats discriminating cocaine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 317:1088–1096

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorrain DS, Arnold GM, Vezina P (2000) Previous exposure to amphetamine increases incentive to obtain the drug: long-lasting effects revealed by the progressive ratio schedule. Behav Brain Res 107:9–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch WJ, Heaser WA, Carroll ME (1998) Effects of amphetamine, butorphanol, and morphine pretreatment on the maintenance and reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 6:255–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbach RS, Balster RL (1993) Effects of mazindol on behavior maintained or occasioned by cocaine. Drug Alcohol Depend 31:183–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Negus SS (2003) Rapid assessment of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys: effects of environmental manipulations and treatment with d-amphetamine and flupenthixol. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:919–931

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Negus SS, Mello NK (2003a) Effects of chronic d-amphetamine treatment on cocaine- and food-maintained responding under a progressive-ratio schedule in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 167:324–332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Negus SS, Mello NK (2003b) Effects of chronic d-amphetamine treatment on cocaine- and food-maintained responding under a second-order schedule in rhesus monkeys. Drug Alcohol Depend 70:39–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien CP (2005) Anticraving medications for relapse prevention: a possible new class of psychoactive medications. Am J Psychiat 162:1423–1431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peltier RL, Li DH, Lytle D, Taylor CM, Emmett-Oglesby MW (1996) Chronic d-amphetamine or methamphetamine produces cross-tolerance to the discriminative and reinforcing stimulus effects of cocaine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 277:212–218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preti A (2007) New developments in the pharmacotherapy of cocaine abuse. Addict Biol 12:133–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson NR, Roberts DCS (1996) Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy. J Neurosci Methods 66:1–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DC, Andrews MM, Vickers GJ (1996) Baclofen attenuates the reinforcing effects of cocaine in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 15:417–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DCS, Bennett SA, Vickers GJ (1989a) The estrous cycle affects cocaine self-administration on a progressive ratio schedule in rats. Psychopharmacology 98:408–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DCS, Loh EA, Vickers GJ (1989b) Self-administration of cocaine on a progressive ratio schedule in rats: dose–response relationship and effect of haloperidol pretreatment. Psychopharmacology 97:535–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2001) Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction 96:103–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scarponi M, Bernardi G, Mercuri NB (1999) Electrophysiological evidence for a reciprocal interaction between amphetamine and cocaine-related drugs on rat midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Eur J Neurosci 11:593–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk S, Partridge B (1999) Cocaine-seeking produced by experimenter-administered drug injections: dose–effect relationships in rats. Psychopharmacology 147:285–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer J (2008) The principles of agonist pharmacotherapy for psychostimulant dependence. Drug Alcohol Rev 27:301–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer J, Wodak A, van BI, Mattick RP, Lewis J (2003) Pilot randomized double blind placebo-controlled study of dexamphetamine for cocaine dependence. Addiction 98:1137–1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes F, Yum SI (1976) Principles of the design and operation of generic osmotic pumps for the delivery of semisolid or liquid drug formulations. Ann Biomed Eng 4(4):343–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ukairo OT, Ramanujapuram S, Surratt CK (2007) Fluctuation of the dopamine uptake inhibition potency of cocaine, but not amphetamine, at mammalian cells expressing the dopamine transporter. Brain Res 1131:68–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vezina P, Lorrain DS, Arnold GM, Austin JD, Suto N (2002) Sensitization of midbrain dopamine neuron reactivity promotes the pursuit of amphetamine. J Neurosci 22:4654–4662

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vocci FJ, Acri J, Elkashef A (2005) Medication development for addictive disorders: the state of the science. Am J Psychiatry 162:1432–1440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vocci FJ, Elkashef A (2005) Pharmacotherapy and other treatments for cocaine abuse and dependence. Curr Opin Psychiatry 18:265–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward SJ, Morgan D, Roberts DC (2005) Comparison of the reinforcing effects of cocaine and cocaine/heroin combinations under progressive ratio and choice schedules in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:286–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler RA, Twining RC, Jones JL, Slater JM, Grigson PS, Carelli RM (2008) Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of negative affect predict cocaine self-administration. Neuron 57:774–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Bozarth MA (1987) A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol Rev 94:469–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA

    Keri A. Chiodo, Christopher M. Läck & David C. S. Roberts

  2. Neuroscience Program, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA

    Keri A. Chiodo

Authors
  1. Keri A. Chiodo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher M. Läck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David C. S. Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. S. Roberts.

Additional information

Funding provided by Grants F30DA18014 (CML), R01DA14030 (DCSR), and P50DA06634-14 (DCSR).

Keri A. Chiodo* and Christopher M. Läck* contributed equally to this project and should be considered co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiodo, K.A., Läck, C.M. & Roberts, D.C.S. Cocaine self-administration reinforced on a progressive ratio schedule decreases with continuous d-amphetamine treatment in rats. Psychopharmacology 200, 465–473 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1222-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1222-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation