Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive-motivational predictors of excessive drinkers’ success in changing

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

The purpose of this study was to identify cognitive (alcohol attentional bias, AAB) and motivational (motivational structure, MS; readiness to change, RTC) predictors of changes in excessive drinking.

Materials and methods

One hundred fifty-eight excessive drinkers not in treatment were administered a test battery and were re-tested 3 and 6 months later. The tests included the alcohol timeline followback, readiness to change questionnaire, alcohol Stroop (to measure AAB), personal concerns inventory (to measure MS), and a measure of family history of alcohol problems (FHAP).

Results

High RTC predicted short-term but not long-term reductions in drinking; both low AAB and high FHAP predicted long-term reductions. MS interacted with both AAB and RTC so that the greatest long-term drinking reductions occurred among participants with adaptive MS and low AAB and among those with adaptive MS and high RTC.

Conclusion

It was concluded that (a) both cognitive and motivational factors affect the likelihood of drinking reductions and (b) a complete understanding of drinking problems should be formulated in terms of both cognitive and motivational variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcohol Concern (2002) State of the nation, 2002. Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://www.alcoholconcern.org.uk/servlets/doc/154

  • Baayen HR, Piepenbrock R, van Rijn H (1993) The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

  • Blume AW, Marlatt GA (2000) Recent important substance-related losses predict readiness to change scores among people with co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Addict Behav 25:461–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce G, Jones BT (2006) Methods, measures, and findings of attentional bias in substance use, abuse, and dependence. In: Wiers RW, Stacy AW (eds) Handbook on implicit cognition and addiction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp 135–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd RJ, Rollnick S (1996) The structure of the readiness to change questionnaire: a test of Prochaska & DiClemente’s transtheoretical model. Br J Health Psychol 1:365–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedrus Corporation (1999) SuperLab Pro SKD (Version 2.1) [Software]. Cedrus Corporation, San Pedro, CA

  • Cox WM, Klinger E (1988) A motivational model of alcohol use. J Abnorm Psychology 97:168–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cox WM, Klinger E (2004a). A motivational model of alcohol use: determinants of use and change. In: Cox WM, Klinger E (eds) Handbook of motivational counseling: concepts, approaches, and assessment. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom, pp 121–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox WM, Klinger E (2004b). Measuring motivation: the motivational structure questionnaire and personal concerns inventory. In: Cox WM, Klinger E (eds) Handbook of motivational counseling: concepts, approaches, and assessment. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom, pp 141–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox WM, Blount JP, Bair J, Hosier SG (2000) Motivational predictors of readiness to change chronic substance abuse. Addict Res 8:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox WM, Pothos EM, Laberg J, Johnsen B (2001). Methodological issues attached to the alcohol Stroop paradigm: comments on a paper by Sharma, Albery, and Cook (2001). Addiction 96:1261–1265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cox WM, Hogan LM, Kristian MR, Race JH (2002a) Alcohol attentional bias as a predictor of alcohol abusers’ treatment outcome. Drug Alcohol Depend 68:237–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox WM, Schippers GM, Klinger E, Skutle A, Stuchlíková I, Man F, King AL, Inderhaug I (2002b) Motivational structure and alcohol use of university students with consistency across four nations. J Stud Alcohol 63:280–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox WM, Fadardi JS, Pothos EM (2006) The addiction-Stroop test: theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychol Bull 132:443–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fadardi JS (2003) Cognitive-motivational determinants of attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli: implications for an attentional-control training programme. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wales, Bangor

  • Fadardi JS, Cox WM (2006a) Alcohol attention bias: drinking salience or cognitive impairment? Psychopharmacology 185(2):169–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fadardi JS, Cox WM (2006b) Alcohol attentional-control training programme, unpublished software, University of Wales, Bangor

  • Heather N (2001). Pleasures and pains of our favourite drug. In: Heather N, Peters TJ, Stockwell TR (eds) Handbook of alcohol dependence and related problems. Wiley, New York, pp 5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Heather N, Rollnick S, Bell A (1993) Predictive validity of the readiness to change questionnaire. Addiction 88:1667–1677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson KM, Sher KJ, Gotham HJ, Wood PK (2001) Transitioning into and out of large-effect drinking in young adulthood. J Abnorm Psychology 110:378–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones BT, Jones BC, Smith H, Copely N (2003) A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users. Addiction 98:235–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger E, Cox WM (2004). Motivation and the theory of current concerns. In: Cox WM, Klinger E (eds) Handbook of motivational counseling: motivating people for change. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom, pp 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranzler HR, Anton RF (1994) Implications of recent neuropsychopharmacologic research for understanding the etiology and development of alcoholism. J Consult Clin Psychol 62:1116–1126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grissom G, Pettinati H, Argeriou M (1992) The fifth edition of the addiction severity index. J Subst Abuse Treat 9:199–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Midanik LA (1988) Validity of self-reported alcohol use: a literature review and assessment. Br J Addict 83:1019–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller WR, Tonigan JS, Longabaugh R (1995) The drinker inventory of consequences (DrInC): an instrument for assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse. Test manual. National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Rockville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer A, Finney JW (2002) Outcomes for untreated individuals involved in randomized trials of alcohol treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 23:247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pothos EM (2007) Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychol Bull (in press)

  • Pothos EM, Cox WM (2002) Cognitive bias for alcohol-related information in inferential processes. Drug Alcohol Depend 66:235–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC (1992) In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol 47:1102–1114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reber AS (1993) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollnick S, Heather N, Gold R, Hall W (1992) Development of a short “Readiness to Change” questionnaire for use in brief opportunistic interventions. Br J Addict 87:743–754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Physicians (2005) Are you younger than you think?: Alcohol. Retrieved April 11, 2006 from http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/healthyliving/alcohol.asp

  • Schacter DL, Chiu C-YP, Ochsner KN (1993). Implicit memory: a selective review. Annu Rev Neurosci 16:159–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sobell LC, Sobell MB (1995) Alcohol timeline followback (TLFB) users’ manual. Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobell LC, Agrawal S, Sobell MB, Leo GI, Young LJ, Cunningham JA, Simco ER (2003) Comparison of a quick drinking screen with the Timeline Followback for individuals with alcohol problems. J Stud Alcohol 64:858–861

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stacy AW (1997) Memory activation and expectancy as prospective predictors of alcohol and marijuana use. J Abnorm Psychology 106:61–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart SH, Hall E, Wilkie H, Birch C (2002) Affective priming of alcohol schema in coping and enhancement motivated drinkers. Cogn Behav Ther 31:68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stormark KM, Laberg JC, Nordby H, Hugdahl K (2000) Alcoholics’ selective attention to alcohol stimuli: automated processing? J Stud Alcohol 61:18–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiffany ST (1990) A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychol Rev 97:147–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eerde W, Thierry H (1996). Vroom’s expectancy models and work-related criteria: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 81:575–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters H, Green MW (2003) A demonstration of attentional bias, using a novel dual task paradigm, towards clinically salient material in recovering alcohol abuse patients? Psychol Med 33:491–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waters A, Sayette MA, Wertz JM (2003). Carry-over effects can modulate emotional Stroop effect. Cogn Emot 17:501–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth AB, Fischer F, Lesch OM, Nimmerrichter A, Oberbauer H, Platz T, Potgieter A, Walter H, Fleischhacker WW (1996) Comparison of acamprosate and placebo in long-term treatment of alcohol dependence. Lancet 347:1438–1442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiers RW, Stacy AW (eds) (2006) Handbook on implicit cognition and addiction. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiers RW, van Woerden N, Smulders FTY, De Jong PJ (2002) Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. J Abnorm Psychology 111:648–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiers RW, Cox WM, Field M, Fadardi JS, Palfai T, Schoenmakers T, Stacy AW (2006) The search for new ways to change implicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 30:320–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Economic and Social Research Council Grant RES-000-23-9563 (awarded to W. Miles Cox and Emmanuel M. Pothos).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2AS, UK

    W. Miles Cox & Steven G. Hosier

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Wales, Swansea, UK

    Emmanuel M. Pothos

Authors
  1. W. Miles Cox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emmanuel M. Pothos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven G. Hosier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Miles Cox.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cox, W.M., Pothos, E.M. & Hosier, S.G. Cognitive-motivational predictors of excessive drinkers’ success in changing. Psychopharmacology 192, 499–510 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0736-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0736-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation