Skip to main content
Log in

A triazolam/amphetamine dose–effect interaction study: dissociation of effects on memory versus arousal

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

In addition to producing robust memory impairment, benzodiazepines also induce marked sedation. Thus, it is possible that the observed amnestic effects are secondary to more global sedative effects and do not reflect a specific primary benzodiazepine effect on memory mechanisms.

Objective

The objective was to use the nonspecific stimulant d-amphetamine to dissociate the sedative and memory-impairing effects of the benzodiazepine triazolam.

Materials and methods

Single oral doses of placebo, triazolam alone (0.25, 0.50 mg/70 kg), d-amphetamine sulfate alone (20, 30 mg/70 kg), and triazolam (0.25, 0.50 mg/70 kg) and d-amphetamine sulfate (20, 30 mg/70 kg) conjointly (at all dose combinations) were administered to 18 healthy adult participants across nine sessions in a double-blind, staggered-dosing, crossover design. In addition to standard data analyses, analyses were also conducted on z-score standardized data, enabling effects to be directly compared across measures.

Results

Relative to the sedative measures, the memory measures generally exhibited a pattern of less reversal of triazolam’s effects by d-amphetamine. The memory measures ranged in degree of reversal such that the most reversal was observed for reaction time on the n-back working memory task, and the least reversal was observed for accuracy on the Sternberg working memory task, with most measures showing an overall pattern of partial reversal.

Conclusions

Benzodiazepines have specific effects on memory that are not merely a by-product of the drugs’ sedative effects, and the degree to which sedative effects contribute to the amnestic effects varies as a function of the particular memory process being assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baddeley AD (1992) Working memory: the interface between memory and cognition. J Cogn Neurosci 4:281–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop KI, Curran HV (1995) Psychopharmacological analysis of implicit and explicit memory: a study with lorazepam and the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil. Psychopharmacology 121:267–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blin O, Simon N, Jouve E, Habib M, Gayraud D, Durand A, Bruguerolle B, Pisano P (2001) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of sedative and amnesic effects of lorazepam in healthy volunteers. Clin Neuropharmacol 24:71–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buffett-Jerrott SE, Stewart SH (2002) Cognitive and sedative effects of benzodiazepine use. Curr Pharm Des 8:45–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burns JT, House RF, Fensch FC, Miller JG (1967) Effects of magnesium pemoline and dextroamphetamine on human learning. Science 155:849–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curran HV (1991) Benzodiazepines, memory and mood: a review. Psychopharmacology 105:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curran HV (2000) Psychopharmacological approaches to human memory. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The new cognitive neurosciences, 2nd edn. Boston, MIT, pp 797–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran HV, Birch B (1991) Differentiating the sedative and amnestic effects of benzodiazepines: a study with midazolam and the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil. Psychopharmacology 103:519–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curran HV, Bond A, O’Sullivan G, Bruce M, Marks I, Lelliot P, Shine P, Lader M (1994) Memory functions, alprazolam and exposure therapy: a controlled longitudinal study of patients with agoraphobia and panic disorder. Psychol Med 24:969–976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curran HV, Pooviboonsuk P, Dalton JA, Lader MH (1998) Differentiating the effects of centrally acting drugs on arousal and memory: an event-related potential study of scopolamine, lorazepam and diphenhydramine. Psychopharmacology 135:27–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Esposito M, Postle BR, Ballard D, Lease J (1999) Maintenance versus manipulation of information held in working memory: an event-related fMRI study. Brain Cogn 41:66–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell JH (1971) What is memory development the development of? Hum Dev 14:272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming K, Bigelow LB, Weinberger DR, Goldberg TE (1995) Neuropsychological effects of amphetamine may correlate with personality characteristics. Psychopharmacol Bull 31:357–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoneim MM (2004a) Drugs and human memory (part 1): clinical, theoretical, and methodologic issues. Anesthesiology 100:987–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoneim MM (2004b) Drugs and human memory (part 2): clinical, theoretical, and methodologic issues. Anesthesiology 100:1277–1297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoneim MM, Mewaldt SP, Berie JL, Hinrichs V (1981) Memory and performance effects of single and 3 week administration of diazepam. Psychopharmacology 73:147–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman LA, Kruskal WH (1954) Measures of association for cross-classifications. J Am Stat Assoc 49:732–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green JF, McElholm A, King DJ (1996) A comparison of the sedative and amnestic effects of chlorpromazine and lorazepam. Psychopharmacology 128:67–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Liebson I (1983) Differential effects of diazepam and pentobarbital on mood and behavior. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:865–873

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollister LE, Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Rickels K, Shader RI (1993) Clinical uses of benzodiazepines. J Clin Psychopharmacol 13:1S–169S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hommer D, Weingartner H, Breier A (1993) Dissociation of benzodiazepine-induced amnesia from sedation by flumazenil. Psychopharmacology 112:455–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst PM, Radlow R, Chubb NC, Bagley SK (1969) Effects of d-amphetamine on acquisition, persistence, and recall. Am J Psychol 82:307–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonides J, Schumacher EH, Smith EE, Lauber EJ, Awh E, Minoshima S, Koeppe RA (1997) Verbal working memory load affects regional brain activation as measured by PET. J Cogn Neurosci 9:462–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice AJH, de Wit H (2000a) Acute effects of d-amphetamine during the early and late follicular phases of the menstrual cycle in women. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 66:509–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Justice AJH, de Wit H (2000b) Acute effects of estradiol pretreatment on the response to d-amphetamine in women. Neuroendocrinology 71:51–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RS, Odenheimer RC, Baltzley DR, Dunlap WP, Wood CD (1990) Differential effects of scopolamine and amphetamine on microcomputer-based performance tests. Aviat Space Environ Med 61:615–621

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keppel G (1991) Design and analysis: a research’s handbook, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk T, Roache JD, Griffiths RR (1990) Dose–response evaluation of the amnestic effects of triazolam and pentobarbital in normal subjects. J Clin Psychopharmacol 10:160–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kornetsky C (1958) Effects of meprobamate, phenobarbital and dextroamphetamine on reaction time and learning in man. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 123:216–219

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattay VS, Callicott JH, Bertolino A, Heaton I, Frank JA, Coppola R, Berman KF, Goldberg TE, Weinberger DR (2000) Effects of dextroamphetamine on cognitive performance and cortical activation. NeuroImage 12:268–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattay VS, Goldberg TE, Fera F, Hariri AR, Tessitore A, Egan MF, Kolachana B, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR (2003) Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:6186–6191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod DR, Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Yingling J (1982) An automated version of the digit symbol substitution test (DSST). Behav Res Meth Instrum 14:463–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe J, Shimamura AP (1994) Metacognition: knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzer MZ, Griffiths RR (2003) Lorazepam and scopolamine: a single-dose comparison of effects on human memory and attentional processes. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 11:56–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzer MZ, Griffiths RR, Contoreggi C, Kimes AS, London ED, Ernst M (2001) Effects of triazolam on brain activity during episodic memory encoding: a PET study. Neuropsychopharmacology 25:744–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neave N, Reid C, Scholey AB, Thompson JM, Moss M, Ayre G, Wesnes K, Girdler NM (2000) Dose-dependent effects of flumazenil on cognition, mood, and cardio-respiratory physiology in healthy volunteers. Br Dent J 189:668–674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson TO (1984) A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling of knowing predictions. Psychol Bull 95:109–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Postle BR, Berger JS, D’Esposito M (1999) Functional neuroanatomical double dissociation of mnemonic and executive control processes contributing to working memory performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:12959–12964

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preston KL, Bigelow GE, Liebson IA (1989) Antagonist effects of nalbuphine in opioid-dependent human volunteers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 248:929–937

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport JL, Buchsbaum MS, Weingartner H, Zahn TP, Ludlow C, Mikkelsen EJ (1980) Dextroamphetamine. Its cognitive and behavioral effects in normal and hyperactive boys and normal men. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37:933–943

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1982) Functional studies of the central catecholamines. Int Rev Neurobiol 23:303–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smirne S, Ferini-Strambi L, Pirola R, Tancredi O, Franceschi M, Pinto P, Bareggi SR (1989) Effects of flunitrazepam on cognitive functions. Psychopharmacology 98:251–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass JG, Corwin J (1988) Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. J Exp Psychol Gen 117:34–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soetens S, Casaer S, D’Hooge R, Hueting JE (1995) Effect of amphetamine on long-term retention of verbal material. Psychopharmacology 119:155–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solanto MV (1998) Neuropsychopharmacological mechanisms of stimulant drug action in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review and integration. Behav Brain Res 94:127–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg S (1969) The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donder’s method. Acta Psychol 30:276–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tata PR, Rollings J, Collins M, Pickering A, Jacobson RR (1994) Lack of cognitive recovery following withdrawal from long-term benzodiazepine use. Psychol Med 24:203–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike EL, Lorge I (1944) The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. Teacher’s College, Columbia University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E (1972) Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving E, Donaldson W (eds) Organization of memory. New York, Academic, pp 381–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E (1983) Elements of episodic memory. Oxford University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Veselis RA, Reinsel RA, Feshchenko VA (2001) Drug-induced amnesia is a separate phenomenon from sedation: electrophysiologic evidence. Anesthesiology 95:896–907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veselis RA, Reinsel RA, Feshchenko VA, Wronski M (1997) The comparative amnestic effects of midazolam, propofol, thiopental, and fentanyl at equisedative concentrations. Anesthesiology 87:749–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner HJ, Sirocco K, Rawlings R, Joyce E, Hommer D (1995) Dissociations in the expression of the sedative effects of triazolam. Psychopharmacology 119:27–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss B, Laties VG (1962) Enhancement of human performance by caffeine and the amphetamines. Pharmacol Rev 14:1–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzner M (1965) Manifest anxiety, amphetamine, and performance. J Psychol 60:71–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White TL, Justice AJH, de Wit H (2002) Differential subjective effects of d-amphetamine by gender, hormone levels and menstrual cycle phase. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 73:729–741

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams EJ (1949) Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Aust J Sci Res 2:149–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods JH, Katz JL, Winger G (1992) Benzodiazepines: use, abuse, and consequences. Pharmacol Rev 44:151–347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This project was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Grant DA-11936. The authors thank Crystal Barnhouser, Kristina Burns, and Koty Nadeau for protocol management, John Yingling for computer programming assistance and technical support, and Linda Felch and Paul Nuzzo for assistance with data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam Z. Mintzer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mintzer, M.Z., Griffiths, R.R. A triazolam/amphetamine dose–effect interaction study: dissociation of effects on memory versus arousal. Psychopharmacology 192, 425–440 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0726-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0726-y

Keywords

Navigation