Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of methadone and buprenorphine on the immune system in drug abusers

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Buprenorphine may be a useful alternative option to methadone in addicts. Opioids can produce severe changes in the immune system.

Objectives

The objectives of this study are to compare the effect of sublingual buprenorphine and methadone on the immune system and to compare the two substances on the drying-out program compliance.

Methods

We studied 62 randomized outpatients for a period of 12 months. Subjects (55 males and 7 females; mean age 25±4 years; average history of heroin abuse being 2 years) on maintenance treatment were assigned in two groups (A and B). Methadone chloride (medium dose 100 mg/day) was administered to group A, whereas group B received sublingual buprenorphine (32.40±2.8 mg/day). Urine toxicological screening, plasma levels of TNF-alpha interleukin-1, interleukin-beta, lymphocyte CD14 and a self-rating depression questionnaire were measured.

Results

Urine screening was negative for opiates in 17.6% of group A and in 10.7% of group B (p<0.001; r=0.62). Depression score was 62±2 in group A and 55±3 in group B (p<0.01). Cytokine and CD14 revealed higher concentrations both in groups A and B without significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups.

Conclusions

The effects of buprenorphine and methadone tested on the immune system were overlapping in our patients. The elevated cytokine levels observed may suggest that the two drugs stimulate immunologic hyperactivation of an immune system that was formerly inhibited by heroin. Furthermore, our data suggest that buprenorphine can be a valid alternative to methadone in maintenance treatment of chronic heroin abuse and referred a marked decline in depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auriacombe M, Franques P, Tignol J (2001) Deaths attributable to methadone vs buprenorphine in France. JAMA 285:45

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran HV, Bolton J, Wanigaratne S, Smyth C (1999) Additional methadone increases craving for heroin: a double blind, placebo controlled study of chronic opiate users receiving methadone substitution treatment. Addiction 94:665–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald MK, Joanson CF, Moody DE, Kilbown MR, Koeppe RA, Schuster CR, Zubieta JK (2003) Effects of buprenorphine maintenance dose on μ-opioid receptor availability, plasma concentrations, and antagonist blockade in heroin-dependent volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:2000–2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RE, Chutuape MA, Strain EC, Walsh SL, Stitzer ML, Bigelow CE (2000) A comparison of buprenorphine and methadone for opiate dependence. N Engl J Med 343:1290–1297

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakko J, Svanborg KD, Kreek MJ, Heilig M (2003) 1-Year retention and social function after buprenorphine-assisted relapse prevention treatment for heroin dependence in Sweden: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 361:662–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreek MJ (1996) Long-term pharmacotherapy for opiate addiction: opioid agonists. In: Schuster CR, Kuhar MJ (eds) Pharmacological aspects of drug dependence, vol. 118. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 487–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Krook AL, Brors O, Dahlberg J, Grouff K, Magnus P, Roysamb et al (2002) A placebo-controlled study of high dose buprenorphine in opiate dependents waiting for medication-assisted rehabilitation in Oslo, Norway. Addiction 97(5):533–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Neri S, Bruno CM, Abate G, Ierna D, Mauceri B, Cilio D et al (2002) Controlled clinical trial of assess the response of recent heroin abusers with chronic hepatitis C virus infection to treatment with interferon alpha-n2b. Clin Ther 24(10):1627–1635

    Google Scholar 

  • Obadia Y, Perrin V, Feroni I, Vlahov D, Moatti JP (2001) Injecting misuse of buprenorphine among French drug users. Addiction 96:267–272

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor PG, Fiellin DA (2000) Pharmacological treatment of heroin-dependent patients. Ann Intern Med 133:40–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacifici R, Di Carlo S, Bacosi A et al (2000) Pharmaceutics and cytokine production in heroin and morphine-treated mice. Int J Immunopharmacol 22:603–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson PK, Molitor TW, Chao CC (1993) Mechanisms of morphine-induced immunomodulation. Biochem Pharmacol 46:343–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy S, Loh HH (1996) Effects of opioids on the immune system. Neurochem Res 21:1375–1386

    Google Scholar 

  • Varescon I, Vidal-Trecan G, Nabet N, Boissonnas A (2002) Buprenorphine deviated from normal use: the buprenorphine injection. Encephale 28:397–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal-Trevan G, Varescon I, Nebert N, Boissonnes A (2003) Intravenous use of prescribed sublingual buprenorphine tablets by drug user receiving maintenance therapy in France. Drug Alcohol Depend 69:175–181

    Google Scholar 

  • West JP, Lysle DT, Dykstra LA (1997) Tolerance development to morphine-induced alterations of immune status. Drug Alcohol Depend 45:147–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmann K, Dunne JF (2000) A flow cytometric immune function assay for human peripheral blood dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol 67:536–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Zung WWK (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12:63–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Neri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neri, S., Bruno, C.M., Pulvirenti, D. et al. Randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of methadone and buprenorphine on the immune system in drug abusers. Psychopharmacology 179, 700–704 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-2239-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-2239-x

Keywords

Navigation