Abstract
Rationale
The conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm has been used as a measure of the rewarding effects of a number of stimuli. Critically, this classical conditioning procedure requires the formation of associations between a rewarding stimulus and environmental cues, and the ability of these cues to direct subsequent behaviour.
Objectives
The purpose of the current experiments was to examine the role of glutamatergic transmission via subunit-specific populations of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA) receptors in the formation of stimulus–reward associations involving contextual stimuli.
Methods
We investigated the ability of cocaine and food to induce a CPP in mice lacking either the GluR1 or GluR2 subunits of the AMPA receptor [gria1 or gria2 knockout (KO) mice]. In separate experiments, food pellets or cocaine (5–20 mg/kg IP) were paired with one compartment of the CPP apparatus, while no-food or vehicle was paired with an alternative compartment.
Results
Following conditioning, gria1 KOs displayed a significant preference for the food or cocaine-paired compartment, and did not differ from wild-type (WT) controls. However, gria2 knockouts displayed a preference for a cocaine-paired compartment, but not a food-paired compartment, indicating a specific deficit in place preference conditioning to food.
Conclusions
These results obtained using knockout mice indicate that GluR2-containing AMPA receptors may be critical for learning about contextual stimuli relevant to food rewards, but not drug rewards. When the results are considered in relation to our previous findings with gria1 and gria2 knockout mice, they also raise questions about the CPP paradigm representing a model of conditioned reward over a conditioned approach interpretation. However, it would be important to confirm these findings with alternative approaches, should selective ligands become available.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anagnostaras SG, Gale GD, Fanselow MS (2001) Hippocampus and contextual fear conditioning: recent controversies and advances. Hippocampus 11:8–17
Birch PJ, Grossman CJ, Hayes AG (1988) Kynurenate and FG9041 have both competitive and non-competitive antagonist actions at excitatory amino acid receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 151:313–315
Burns LH, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1993) Differential effects of excitotoxic lesions of the basolateral amygdala, ventral subiculum and medial prefrontal cortex on responding with conditioned reinforcement and locomotor activity potentiated by intra-accumbens infusions of d-amphetamine. Behav Brain Res 55:167–183
Cardinal RN, Everitt BJ (2004) Neural and psychological mechanisms underlying appetitive learning: links to drug addiction. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14:156–162
Carlezon WA Jr, Nestler EJ (2002) Elevated levels of GluR1 in the midbrain: a trigger for sensitization to drugs of abuse? Trends Neurosci 25:610–615
Carlezon WA Jr, Haile CN, Coppersmith R, Hayashi Y, Malinow R, Neve RL, Nestler EJ (2000) Distinct sites of opiate reward and aversion within the midbrain identified using a herpes simplex virus vector expressing GluR1. J Neurosci 20:RC62
Cervo L, Samanin R (1995) Effects of dopaminergic and glutamatergic receptor antagonists on the acquisition and expression of cocaine conditioning place preference. Brain Res 673:242–250
Everitt BJ, Morris KA, O’Brien A, Robbins TW (1991) The basolateral amygdala–ventral striatal system and conditioned place preference: further evidence of limbic–striatal interactions underlying reward-related processes. Neuroscience 42:1–18
Everitt BJ, Cardinal R, Hall J, Parkinson J, Robbins T (2000) Differential involvement of amygdala subsystems in appetitive conditioning and drug addiction. In: Aggleton J (ed) The amygdala. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 353–390
Gallagher M, Graham PW, Holland PC (1990) The amygdala central nucleus and appetitive Pavlovian conditioning: lesions impair one class of conditioned behavior. J Neurosci 10:1906–1911
Gerlai R, Henderson JT, Roder JC, Jia Z (1998) Multiple behavioral anomalies in GluR2 mutant mice exhibiting enhanced LTP. Behav Brain Res 95:37–45
Gewirtz JC, McNish KA, Davis M (2000) Is the hippocampus necessary for contextual fear conditioning? Behav Brain Res 110:83–95
Goldstein JM, Litwin AC (1993) NBQX is a selective non-NMDA receptor antagonist in rat hippocampal slice. Mol Chem Neuropathol 18:145–152
Holland PC, Bouton ME (1999) Hippocampus and context in classical conditioning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:195–202
Jia Z, Agopyan N, Miu P, Xiong Z, Henderson J, Gerlai R, Taverna FA, Velumian A, MacDonald J, Carlen P, Abramow-Newerly W, Roder J (1996) Enhanced LTP in mice deficient in the AMPA receptor GluR2. Neuron 17:945–956
Kaddis FG, Uretsky NJ, Wallace LJ (1995) DNQX in the nucleus accumbens inhibits cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. Brain Res 697:76–82
Kessler M, Baudry M, Lynch G (1989) Quinoxaline derivatives are high-affinity antagonists of the NMDA receptor-associated glycine sites. Brain Res 489:377–382
Layer RT, Uretsky NJ, Wallace LJ (1993) Effects of the AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist DNQX in the nucleus accumbens on drug-induced conditioned place preference. Brain Res 617:267–273
Mackintosh N (1974) The psychology of animal learning. Academic, London
Maren S, Holt W (2000) The hippocampus and contextual memory retrieval in Pavlovian conditioning. Behav Brain Res 110:97–108
McAlonan GM, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1993) Effects of medial dorsal thalamic and ventral pallidal lesions on the acquisition of a conditioned place preference: further evidence for the involvement of the ventral striatopallidal system in reward-related processes. Neuroscience 52:605–620
Mead AN, Stephens DN (1999) CNQX but not NBQX prevents expression of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning: a role for the glycine site of the NMDA receptor, but not AMPA receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 290:9–15
Mead AN, Stephens DN (2003a) Involvement of AMPA receptor GluR2 subunits in stimulus–reward learning: evidence from glutamate receptor gria2 knock-out mice. J Neurosci 23:9500–9507
Mead AN, Stephens DN (2003b) Selective disruption of stimulus–reward learning in glutamate receptor gria1 knock-out mice. J Neurosci 23:1041–1048
Mead AN, Vasilaki A, Spyraki C, Duka T, Stephens DN (1999) AMPA-receptor involvement in c-fos expression in the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala dissociates neural substrates of conditioned activity and conditioned reward. Eur J Neurosci 11:4089–4098
Pellegrini-Giampietro DE, Galli A, Alesiani M, Cherici G, Moroni F (1989) Quinoxalines interact with the glycine recognition site of NMDA receptors: studies in guinea-pig myenteric plexus and in rat cortical membranes. Br J Pharmacol 98:1281–1286
Robbins TW (1978) The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine. Psychopharmacology 58:79–87
Schmitt WB, Deacon RM, Reisel D, Sprengel R, Seeburg PH, Rawlins JN, Bannerman DM (2004) Spatial reference memory in GluR-A-deficient mice using a novel hippocampal-dependent paddling pool escape task. Hippocampus 14:216–223
Sheardown MJ, Nielsen EO, Hansen AJ, Jacobsen P, Honore T (1990) 2,3-Dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo(F)quinoxaline: a neuroprotectant for cerebral ischemia. Science 247:571–574
Steppuhn KG, Turski L (1993) Diazepam dependence prevented by glutamate antagonists. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:6889–6893
Tzschentke TM (1998) Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Prog Neurobiol 56:613–672
Tzschentke TM, Schmidt WJ (1997) Interactions of MK-801 and GYKI 52466 with morphine and amphetamine in place preference conditioning and behavioural sensitization. Behav Brain Res 84:99–107
Yoneda Y, Suzuki T, Ogita K, Han D (1993) Support for radiolabeling of a glycine recognition domain on the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor ionophore complex by 5,7-[3H]dichlorokynurenate in rat brain. J Neurochem 60:634–645
Zamanillo D, Sprengel R, Hvalby O, Jensen V, Burnashev N, Rozov A, Kaiser KM, Koster HJ, Borchardt T, Worley P, Lubke J, Frotscher M, Kelly PH, Sommer B, Andersen P, Seeburg PH, Sakmann B (1999) Importance of AMPA receptors for hippocampal synaptic plasticity but not for spatial learning. Science 284:1805–1811
Acknowledgements
Funding for this study was provided by BBSRC Project Grant S14554 and MRC Programme Grant G9806260. We thank Stuart Rulten for carrying out the PCR reactions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mead, A.N., Brown, G., Le Merrer, J. et al. Effects of deletion of gria1 or gria2 genes encoding glutamatergic AMPA-receptor subunits on place preference conditioning in mice. Psychopharmacology 179, 164–171 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-2071-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-2071-8